Is diabetes a contraindication to lower extremity flap reconstruction? An analysis of threatened lower extremities in the NSQIP database (2010-2020)

Amy Chen, Shannon R. Garvey, Nimish Saxena, Valeria P. Bustos, Emmeline Jia, Monica Morgenstern, Asha D. Nanda, A. S. Dowlatshahi, R. Cauley
{"title":"Is diabetes a contraindication to lower extremity flap reconstruction? An analysis of threatened lower extremities in the NSQIP database (2010-2020)","authors":"Amy Chen, Shannon R. Garvey, Nimish Saxena, Valeria P. Bustos, Emmeline Jia, Monica Morgenstern, Asha D. Nanda, A. S. Dowlatshahi, R. Cauley","doi":"10.1055/a-2233-2617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The impact of diabetes on complication rates following free flap, pedicled flap, and amputation procedures on the lower extremity (LE) is examined. Methods: Patients who underwent LE pedicle flap (PF), free flap (FF), and amputation (AMP) procedures were identified from the 2010-2020 ACS-NSQIP® database using CPT and ICD-9/10 codes, excluding cases for non-LE pathologies. The cohort was divided into diabetics and non-diabetics. Univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Among 38,998 patients undergoing LE procedures, 58% were diabetic. Among diabetics, 95% underwent amputation (AMP), 5% underwent pedicled flap (PF), and <1% underwent free flap (FF). Across all procedure types, non-insulin dependent (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were associated with significantly greater all-cause complication rates compared to absence of diabetes, and IDDM was generally higher risk than NIDDM. Among diabetics, complication rates were not significantly different across procedure types (IDDM: p=0.5969; NIDDM: p=0.1902). On adjusted subgroup analysis by diabetic status, flap procedures were not associated with higher odds of complications compared to amputation for IDDM and NIDDM patients. Length of stay>30days (LOS>30) was statistically associated with IDDM, particularly those undergoing FF (AMP:5%, PF:7%, FF:14%, p=0.0004). Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of preoperative diabetic optimization prior to LE procedures. For diabetic patients, there were few significant differences in complication rates across procedure type, suggesting that diabetic patients are not at higher risk of complications when attempting limb salvage instead of amputation. Key Words: Diabetes, Lower extremity, Flap reconstruction","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2233-2617","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of diabetes on complication rates following free flap, pedicled flap, and amputation procedures on the lower extremity (LE) is examined. Methods: Patients who underwent LE pedicle flap (PF), free flap (FF), and amputation (AMP) procedures were identified from the 2010-2020 ACS-NSQIP® database using CPT and ICD-9/10 codes, excluding cases for non-LE pathologies. The cohort was divided into diabetics and non-diabetics. Univariate and adjusted multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Among 38,998 patients undergoing LE procedures, 58% were diabetic. Among diabetics, 95% underwent amputation (AMP), 5% underwent pedicled flap (PF), and <1% underwent free flap (FF). Across all procedure types, non-insulin dependent (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) were associated with significantly greater all-cause complication rates compared to absence of diabetes, and IDDM was generally higher risk than NIDDM. Among diabetics, complication rates were not significantly different across procedure types (IDDM: p=0.5969; NIDDM: p=0.1902). On adjusted subgroup analysis by diabetic status, flap procedures were not associated with higher odds of complications compared to amputation for IDDM and NIDDM patients. Length of stay>30days (LOS>30) was statistically associated with IDDM, particularly those undergoing FF (AMP:5%, PF:7%, FF:14%, p=0.0004). Conclusion: Our study highlights the importance of preoperative diabetic optimization prior to LE procedures. For diabetic patients, there were few significant differences in complication rates across procedure type, suggesting that diabetic patients are not at higher risk of complications when attempting limb salvage instead of amputation. Key Words: Diabetes, Lower extremity, Flap reconstruction
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病是下肢皮瓣重建的禁忌症吗?对NSQIP数据库(2010-2020年)中受威胁下肢的分析
背景:研究糖尿病对下肢(LE)游离皮瓣、带蒂皮瓣和截肢术后并发症发生率的影响。 方法:对接受下肢椎弓根皮瓣(LE pedicle flap,PP)和截肢手术的患者进行研究:使用 CPT 和 ICD-9/10 编码从 2010-2020 年 ACS-NSQIP® 数据库中确定了接受下肢椎弓根皮瓣 (PF)、游离皮瓣 (FF) 和截肢 (AMP) 手术的患者,排除了非下肢病变的病例。组群分为糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者。进行了单变量和调整后多变量逻辑回归分析。 结果在 38,998 名接受 LE 手术的患者中,58% 患有糖尿病。在糖尿病患者中,95%接受了截肢手术(AMP),5%接受了脚皮瓣手术(PF),30天(LOS>30)与IDDM有统计学关系,尤其是接受FF手术的患者(AMP:5%, PF:7%, FF:14%, p=0.0004)。 结论 我们的研究强调了在 LE 手术前进行术前糖尿病优化的重要性。对于糖尿病患者而言,不同手术类型的并发症发生率几乎没有显著差异,这表明糖尿病患者在尝试肢体挽救而非截肢时并不会面临更高的并发症风险。 关键字糖尿病 下肢 皮瓣重建
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Guidelines and Technical Tips for Neck Aesthetics with Botulinum Toxin Comparison of Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap on Radiation-induced Peri-implant Capsular Contracture in a Rabbit Model Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview Case series and literature review of up-to-date surgical management of occipital neuralgia Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1