Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction

Ji Won Hwang, Su Min Kim, Jin-Woo Park, Kyong-Je Woo
{"title":"Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction","authors":"Ji Won Hwang, Su Min Kim, Jin-Woo Park, Kyong-Je Woo","doi":"10.1055/a-2358-8864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nImpact of previous radiation therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on early complication in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has not been clearly elucidated. This study investigated whether direct-to-implant reconstruction is viable in patients with NACT or a history of preoperative chest wall irradiation.\nMethods\nMedical records of breast cancer patients who underwent nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy with DTI breast reconstruction from March 2018 to February 2021, with at least one year of follow-up in a single tertiary center, were reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative details, and postoperative complications, including full-thickness necrosis, infection, and removal were reviewed. Risk factors suggested by previous literature, including NACT and preoperative chest wall irradiation histories, were reviewed by multivariate analysis.\nResults\nA total of 206 breast cancer patients were included, of which, 9 were bilateral, 8 patients (3.9%) had a history of prior chest wall irradiation, and 17 (8.6%) had received NACT. From 215 cases, 11 cases (5.1%) required surgical intervention for full-thickness necrosis, while IV antibiotics or hospitalization was needed in 11 cases (5.1%), with 14 cases of failure (6.5%) reported. Using multivariable analysis, preoperative irradiation was found to significantly increase the risk of full-thickness skin necrosis (OR = 12.14, p = 0.034), and reconstruction failure (OR = 13.14, p = 0.005). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor in any of the above complications. \nConclusion\nDTI breast reconstruction is a viable option for patients who have received NACT, although reconstructive options should be carefully explored for patients with a history of breast irradiation.","PeriodicalId":505284,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2358-8864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Impact of previous radiation therapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on early complication in direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has not been clearly elucidated. This study investigated whether direct-to-implant reconstruction is viable in patients with NACT or a history of preoperative chest wall irradiation. Methods Medical records of breast cancer patients who underwent nipple-sparing or skin-sparing mastectomy with DTI breast reconstruction from March 2018 to February 2021, with at least one year of follow-up in a single tertiary center, were reviewed. Demographic data, intraoperative details, and postoperative complications, including full-thickness necrosis, infection, and removal were reviewed. Risk factors suggested by previous literature, including NACT and preoperative chest wall irradiation histories, were reviewed by multivariate analysis. Results A total of 206 breast cancer patients were included, of which, 9 were bilateral, 8 patients (3.9%) had a history of prior chest wall irradiation, and 17 (8.6%) had received NACT. From 215 cases, 11 cases (5.1%) required surgical intervention for full-thickness necrosis, while IV antibiotics or hospitalization was needed in 11 cases (5.1%), with 14 cases of failure (6.5%) reported. Using multivariable analysis, preoperative irradiation was found to significantly increase the risk of full-thickness skin necrosis (OR = 12.14, p = 0.034), and reconstruction failure (OR = 13.14, p = 0.005). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not a significant risk factor in any of the above complications. Conclusion DTI breast reconstruction is a viable option for patients who have received NACT, although reconstructive options should be carefully explored for patients with a history of breast irradiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新辅助化疗和术前照射对直接植入式乳房再造早期并发症的影响
目的 既往放疗和新辅助化疗(NACT)对直接植入(DTI)乳房重建早期并发症的影响尚未明确阐明。本研究调查了有 NACT 或术前胸壁照射史的患者是否可以进行直接植入重建。方法回顾了 2018 年 3 月至 2021 年 2 月期间在一家三级中心接受乳头或皮肤保留乳房切除术并进行 DTI 乳房重建的乳腺癌患者的医疗记录,这些患者的随访时间至少为一年。回顾了人口统计学数据、术中细节和术后并发症,包括全厚坏死、感染和切除。结果 共纳入 206 例乳腺癌患者,其中 9 例为双侧乳腺癌,8 例患者(3.9%)有过胸壁照射史,17 例(8.6%)接受过 NACT。在 215 例病例中,11 例(5.1%)因全厚坏死而需要手术干预,11 例(5.1%)需要静脉注射抗生素或住院治疗,14 例(6.5%)报告失败。通过多变量分析发现,术前照射会显著增加全厚皮肤坏死(OR = 12.14,p = 0.034)和重建失败(OR = 13.14,p = 0.005)的风险。新辅助化疗不是导致上述并发症的重要风险因素。结论对于接受过 NACT 的患者来说,DTI 乳房重建是一种可行的选择,但对于有乳房照射史的患者来说,应仔细研究重建方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Guidelines and Technical Tips for Neck Aesthetics with Botulinum Toxin Comparison of Effects of Acellular Dermal Matrix and Latissimus Dorsi Muscle Flap on Radiation-induced Peri-implant Capsular Contracture in a Rabbit Model Injectable "Skin Boosters" in Aging Skin Rejuvenation: A Current Overview Case series and literature review of up-to-date surgical management of occipital neuralgia Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative irradiation on early complications in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1