Construction and Validation of Alternative Usability Scale

Pralhad Adhikari
{"title":"Construction and Validation of Alternative Usability Scale","authors":"Pralhad Adhikari","doi":"10.3126/tuj.v38i2.60770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usability is the extent of a system being user-friendly. The aim of this research was to make a test to measure usability based on five-factor model of usability by Nielsen (1993). Total of 755 participants (Mage=26.1, SD=5.86) representing the users of 21 types of products or services gave responses. Psychometric analyses were done. The test with fifteen items did not fit the model of its parent theory as revealed by confirmatory factor analysis. Principal component analysis was conducted and some items were deleted. Finally, a test of 12 items with two subscales was made. The participants were given a survey in English but they were not its native speakers. The future research can take native speakers and more diverse products’ or services’ users for psychometric analyses of the 15-item version.","PeriodicalId":510562,"journal":{"name":"Tribhuvan University Journal","volume":"221 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribhuvan University Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/tuj.v38i2.60770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Usability is the extent of a system being user-friendly. The aim of this research was to make a test to measure usability based on five-factor model of usability by Nielsen (1993). Total of 755 participants (Mage=26.1, SD=5.86) representing the users of 21 types of products or services gave responses. Psychometric analyses were done. The test with fifteen items did not fit the model of its parent theory as revealed by confirmatory factor analysis. Principal component analysis was conducted and some items were deleted. Finally, a test of 12 items with two subscales was made. The participants were given a survey in English but they were not its native speakers. The future research can take native speakers and more diverse products’ or services’ users for psychometric analyses of the 15-item version.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建和验证替代性可用性量表
可用性是指系统方便用户使用的程度。本研究的目的是根据尼尔森(1993 年)提出的可用性五要素模型进行可用性测试。共有 755 名参与者(年龄=26.1,标准差=5.86)代表 21 种产品或服务的用户做出了回答。我们进行了心理测量分析。确认性因素分析表明,包含 15 个项目的测试与其母理论模型不符。进行了主成分分析,删除了一些项目。最后,对包含两个分量表的 12 个项目进行了测试。我们向参与者提供了一份英语调查问卷,但他们的母语并不是英语。未来的研究可以以母语使用者和更多不同产品或服务的使用者为对象,对 15 个项目的版本进行心理测量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
इतर कविता मा जनजातीय संस्कृति Subsistence via Jala-Samadhi (Sacred Suicide): An Enigmatic Activism of Yogmaya Breaking Barriers: Empowering Women’s Decision-Making in Nepal’s Development Programs Sri Aurobindo-The Pioneer of Human Unity: Relevance in Today’s World Digital Consumerism among Nepalese College Students: A Study of Online Shopping Behavior
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1