MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC FEATURES OF FIREARM PENETRATING ABDOMINAL INJURIES WITH DAMAGE TO THE APPENDIX

E. Khoroshun, V. Nehoduiko, V. V. Makarov, Serhiy I. Panasenko, T. Yakymova, S. Tertyshnyi
{"title":"MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC FEATURES OF FIREARM PENETRATING ABDOMINAL INJURIES WITH DAMAGE TO THE APPENDIX","authors":"E. Khoroshun, V. Nehoduiko, V. V. Makarov, Serhiy I. Panasenko, T. Yakymova, S. Tertyshnyi","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the structure of combat abdominal trauma during all periods of hostilities (according to ATO/JFO data), gunshot wounds dominated, accounting for 87.1%. An analysis of the distribution of those injured with gunshot wounds by the type of projectile causing the injury showed a prevalence of shrapnel injuries over bullet wounds – more than 80%. The aim of the research was to analyze the macroscopic and microscopic changes in firearm penetrating abdominal injuries with damage to the appendix. Materials and Methods. Eight appendectomies were performed due to firearm penetrating abdominal injuries with damage to the appendix. Complaints, medical history, examination data, ultrasound examination according to the FAST protocol, and radiological examinations were studied in all injured patients. To refine the diagnosis and determine the scope of surgical intervention, the WOLF videoendoscopic system was used. Histological examination of the removed appendices was performed, which were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with the Van Gieson stain. A complex of pathomorphological studies was conducted using the Primo Star microscope (Carl Zeiss) at a magnification of ×140. Results. All injuries occurred while wearing a bulletproof vest and were characterized as blind, with 1 (12.5%) being gunshot wounds and 7 (87.5%) being shrapnel wounds. The entrance wound in firearm blind penetrating abdominal injuries with appendix damage was located in the right hypochondriac region – 4 (50%), right flank – 1 (12.5%), right inguinal region – 2 (25%), and mesogastric region – 1 (12.5%) cases. The average size of the entrance wound on the skin was 23.3±0.4×12.4±0.3 cm. All skin wounds were outside the bulletproof vest protection area. The injuries to the appendix had an average size of 15.4±1.2×9.3±0.1 cm. All removed foreign bodies were larger than 1 cm in their largest dimension. Conclusions. In most cases of firearm penetrating abdominal injuries, damage to the appendix is noted with an entrance wound predominantly on the right side. Macroscopically, in firearm blind penetrating abdominal injuries with appendix involvement, the wound on the skin is larger than on the appendix. All foreign metal bodies removed from the abdominal cavity after firearm shrapnel blind abdominal injuries with appendix involvement were of large size. Contusional injuries to the appendix tend to undergo destructive transformation, requiring surgical treatment - appendectomy. The increased frequency of appendix injuries can be explained by the widespread use of shrapnel ammunition in abdominal injuries when personal protective equipment does not provide protection for this area.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":"87 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.6.2023.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In the structure of combat abdominal trauma during all periods of hostilities (according to ATO/JFO data), gunshot wounds dominated, accounting for 87.1%. An analysis of the distribution of those injured with gunshot wounds by the type of projectile causing the injury showed a prevalence of shrapnel injuries over bullet wounds – more than 80%. The aim of the research was to analyze the macroscopic and microscopic changes in firearm penetrating abdominal injuries with damage to the appendix. Materials and Methods. Eight appendectomies were performed due to firearm penetrating abdominal injuries with damage to the appendix. Complaints, medical history, examination data, ultrasound examination according to the FAST protocol, and radiological examinations were studied in all injured patients. To refine the diagnosis and determine the scope of surgical intervention, the WOLF videoendoscopic system was used. Histological examination of the removed appendices was performed, which were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with the Van Gieson stain. A complex of pathomorphological studies was conducted using the Primo Star microscope (Carl Zeiss) at a magnification of ×140. Results. All injuries occurred while wearing a bulletproof vest and were characterized as blind, with 1 (12.5%) being gunshot wounds and 7 (87.5%) being shrapnel wounds. The entrance wound in firearm blind penetrating abdominal injuries with appendix damage was located in the right hypochondriac region – 4 (50%), right flank – 1 (12.5%), right inguinal region – 2 (25%), and mesogastric region – 1 (12.5%) cases. The average size of the entrance wound on the skin was 23.3±0.4×12.4±0.3 cm. All skin wounds were outside the bulletproof vest protection area. The injuries to the appendix had an average size of 15.4±1.2×9.3±0.1 cm. All removed foreign bodies were larger than 1 cm in their largest dimension. Conclusions. In most cases of firearm penetrating abdominal injuries, damage to the appendix is noted with an entrance wound predominantly on the right side. Macroscopically, in firearm blind penetrating abdominal injuries with appendix involvement, the wound on the skin is larger than on the appendix. All foreign metal bodies removed from the abdominal cavity after firearm shrapnel blind abdominal injuries with appendix involvement were of large size. Contusional injuries to the appendix tend to undergo destructive transformation, requiring surgical treatment - appendectomy. The increased frequency of appendix injuries can be explained by the widespread use of shrapnel ammunition in abdominal injuries when personal protective equipment does not provide protection for this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹部火器穿透伤伴有阑尾损伤的宏观和微观特征
导言。在所有敌对时期的战斗腹部创伤结构中(根据 ATO/JFO 数据),枪伤居多,占 87.1%。按射弹类型对枪伤伤员分布情况进行的分析表明,弹片伤比子弹伤更普遍--超过 80%。 研究的目的是分析枪支穿透腹部造成阑尾损伤的宏观和微观变化。 材料和方法。8 例阑尾切除术均因腹部火器穿透伤导致阑尾损伤而进行。对所有伤员的主诉、病史、检查数据、根据 FAST 方案进行的超声波检查和放射学检查进行了研究。为了完善诊断并确定手术范围,使用了 WOLF 视频内窥镜系统。 对切除的阑尾进行了组织学检查,并用苏木精、伊红和范吉森染色法进行了染色。使用 Primo Star 显微镜(卡尔蔡司)进行了综合病理形态学研究,放大倍数为 ×140。 结果。所有伤者都是在穿着防弹背心时受伤的,均为盲伤,其中 1 例(12.5%)为枪伤,7 例(87.5%)为弹片伤。附有阑尾损伤的枪械盲穿透性腹部伤害的入口伤口位于右腹下区--4 例(50%)、右翼--1 例(12.5%)、右腹股沟区--2 例(25%)和胃间区--1 例(12.5%)。皮肤入口伤口的平均大小为 23.3±0.4×12.4±0.3 厘米。所有皮肤伤口都在防弹背心保护区域之外。 阑尾伤口的平均大小为 15.4±1.2×9.3±0.1 厘米。所有取出的异物最大尺寸均大于 1 厘米。 结论在大多数枪械腹部穿透伤病例中,阑尾受损的入口伤口主要位于右侧。从宏观上看,在阑尾受累的枪支盲穿性腹部损伤中,皮肤上的伤口要比阑尾上的伤口大。火器弹片盲穿伤腹部并累及阑尾后,从腹腔取出的所有金属异物都很大。阑尾的挫伤往往会发生破坏性转变,需要手术治疗--阑尾切除术。阑尾损伤频率增加的原因是,在腹部损伤中广泛使用弹片弹药,而个人防护装备无法对这一区域提供保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS OF NODAL PATHOLOGY OF THE THYROID GLAND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD PRESERVATIVES CONTAINING ORGANIC CARBOXYLIC ACIDS JUSTIFICATION OF APPROACHES TO THE ORGANIZATION OF REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS ASSESSMENT OF THE RISKS OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS IN THE POPULATION WHEN REUSING MINE WATER ENHANCED MODEL OF THE SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING COSMETOLOGY SERVICES TO THE POPULATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1