IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS OF NODAL PATHOLOGY OF THE THYROID GLAND

Natalia I. Zinchenko, Victoria G. Khoperi
{"title":"IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS OF NODAL PATHOLOGY OF THE THYROID GLAND","authors":"Natalia I. Zinchenko, Victoria G. Khoperi","doi":"10.31612/2616-4868.5.2024.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. Increasing the efficiency of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of thyroid nodules at the pre-analytical stage by optimizing biopsy technology under ultrasound control. \nMaterials and methods. The material for the study was the results of TAP of thyroid nodules of 1960 patients (aged 16 to 82 years). All patients in the period 2015-2022 underwent FNA of nodular formations of the thyroid gland on the basis of the Department of X-ray and Functional Diagnostics with Ultrasound Studies of the Medical Center of the SIS \"RPC PCM\" SAD. \n FNA was performed by ultrasound doctors of the highest qualification category using a biopsy gun and exclusively under ultrasound control. Sonographic criteria proposed by the ATA (American Thyroid Association) were used to determine the indications for FNA. For 402 patients, biopsy was performed under ultrasound control and without assessment of aspirate adequacy during manipulation. For 1,552 patients during the biopsy an express cytological method was used to assess the adequacy of aspirates, which was performed by an ultrasound doctor who had mastered the technique of preliminary cytological analysis. The efficiency of both methods was compared according to the criterion of informativeness of the obtained cytomorphological material. \nResults. In total, among 1,960 cases of FNA of thyroid nodules, cytological results were not informative in 55 cases (2.81%). In the FNA group without express cytological analysis (402 cases), uninformative cytological results were found in 49 cases (12.19%), and with the use of express cytological analysis during biopsy (1558 cases), uninformative cytological findings were found in only 6 patients (0.39%). \nConclusions. The application of the optimized technology of FNA of thyroid nodules under ultrasound control with express cytology of aspirate by an ultrasound doctor increases the informativeness of the method and the economic component of FNA.","PeriodicalId":502404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","volume":" 38","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31612/2616-4868.5.2024.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. Increasing the efficiency of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) of thyroid nodules at the pre-analytical stage by optimizing biopsy technology under ultrasound control. Materials and methods. The material for the study was the results of TAP of thyroid nodules of 1960 patients (aged 16 to 82 years). All patients in the period 2015-2022 underwent FNA of nodular formations of the thyroid gland on the basis of the Department of X-ray and Functional Diagnostics with Ultrasound Studies of the Medical Center of the SIS "RPC PCM" SAD.  FNA was performed by ultrasound doctors of the highest qualification category using a biopsy gun and exclusively under ultrasound control. Sonographic criteria proposed by the ATA (American Thyroid Association) were used to determine the indications for FNA. For 402 patients, biopsy was performed under ultrasound control and without assessment of aspirate adequacy during manipulation. For 1,552 patients during the biopsy an express cytological method was used to assess the adequacy of aspirates, which was performed by an ultrasound doctor who had mastered the technique of preliminary cytological analysis. The efficiency of both methods was compared according to the criterion of informativeness of the obtained cytomorphological material. Results. In total, among 1,960 cases of FNA of thyroid nodules, cytological results were not informative in 55 cases (2.81%). In the FNA group without express cytological analysis (402 cases), uninformative cytological results were found in 49 cases (12.19%), and with the use of express cytological analysis during biopsy (1558 cases), uninformative cytological findings were found in only 6 patients (0.39%). Conclusions. The application of the optimized technology of FNA of thyroid nodules under ultrasound control with express cytology of aspirate by an ultrasound doctor increases the informativeness of the method and the economic component of FNA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高甲状腺结节病的仪器诊断水平
目的通过优化超声控制下的活检技术,提高甲状腺结节分析前阶段细针穿刺活检(FNA)的效率。材料和方法。研究材料为1960名患者(16至82岁)的甲状腺结节TAP结果。2015-2022 年间的所有患者均在 SIS "RPC PCM" SAD 医疗中心的 X 射线和功能诊断与超声研究部接受了甲状腺结节的 FNA 检查。 FNA 由具有最高资质的超声医生使用活检枪在超声控制下进行。在确定 FNA 的适应症时,采用了 ATA(美国甲状腺协会)提出的超声诊断标准。402名患者的活检是在超声控制下进行的,操作过程中未对抽吸是否充分进行评估。有1552名患者在活检过程中使用了一种快速细胞学方法来评估吸出物的充分性,该方法由一名掌握了初步细胞学分析技术的超声波医生执行。根据获得的细胞形态学材料的信息量标准,对两种方法的效率进行了比较。结果如下在1960例甲状腺结节FNA病例中,共有55例(2.81%)的细胞学结果不具参考价值。在未进行表达式细胞学分析的 FNA 组(402 例)中,49 例(12.19%)的细胞学结果不具参考价值,而在活检过程中使用表达式细胞学分析(1558 例)的患者中,仅有 6 例(0.39%)的细胞学结果不具参考价值。结论在超声控制下应用优化的甲状腺结节 FNA 技术,并由超声医生对抽吸物进行快速细胞学分析,可提高该方法的信息量和 FNA 的经济效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IMPROVEMENT OF INSTRUMENTAL DIAGNOSTICS OF NODAL PATHOLOGY OF THE THYROID GLAND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT OF FOOD PRESERVATIVES CONTAINING ORGANIC CARBOXYLIC ACIDS JUSTIFICATION OF APPROACHES TO THE ORGANIZATION OF REHABILITATION OF PATIENTS WITH UROLITHIASIS ASSESSMENT OF THE RISKS OF MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS IN THE POPULATION WHEN REUSING MINE WATER ENHANCED MODEL OF THE SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING COSMETOLOGY SERVICES TO THE POPULATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1