Problems of applying criminal law measures to legal entities in the context of combating the commission of criminal offenses against participants in criminal proceedings

M. Huzela
{"title":"Problems of applying criminal law measures to legal entities in the context of combating the commission of criminal offenses against participants in criminal proceedings","authors":"M. Huzela","doi":"10.23939/law2023.40.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the problem of the application of criminal law measures to a legal entity in the context of the study of individual criminological problems of prevention and countermeasures against the commission of criminal offenses against participants in criminal proceedings. The article draws attention to the fact that the commission of a criminal offense is not the only and exclusive reason for the possibility of applying some other criminal-legal measures provided for by the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In particular, the facts of committing certain acts that are only outwardly similar to a criminal offense can also be such a reason. In such a case, the problem of applying coercive criminal-legal measures against legal entities is worthy of attention, since the legal entity is not held criminally liable in the form of a punishment, but the state reacts in the form of criminal-legal measures. The application of criminal-legal measures against legal entities simultaneously with the prosecution of the perpetrator of a criminally illegal act is one additional means of combating the commission of criminal offenses, including regarding participants in criminal proceedings. The unconditional progressiveness of establishing in the current Criminal Code of Ukraine the norms on the application of measures of criminal legal influence to legal entities is confirmed, as evidenced by the successful experience of some member states of the European Union. The application of a specific measure of criminal legal influence to a legal entity is determined by the court in the indictment in which the natural authorized person is found guilty of committing on behalf and/or in the interests of such a legal entity one of the criminal offenses provided for in Art. 96-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and she was assigned a specific type and amount of punishment. The specified measures of a criminal legal nature are a specific means of bringing legal entities in criminal proceedings to the so-called \"quasi-criminal responsibility\", which is undoubtedly an additional tool for the prevention and prevention of criminal offenses, including and regarding subjects of criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":505933,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","volume":"47 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Nacional’nogo universitetu «Lvivska politehnika». Seria: Uridicni nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23939/law2023.40.301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of the application of criminal law measures to a legal entity in the context of the study of individual criminological problems of prevention and countermeasures against the commission of criminal offenses against participants in criminal proceedings. The article draws attention to the fact that the commission of a criminal offense is not the only and exclusive reason for the possibility of applying some other criminal-legal measures provided for by the Criminal Code of Ukraine. In particular, the facts of committing certain acts that are only outwardly similar to a criminal offense can also be such a reason. In such a case, the problem of applying coercive criminal-legal measures against legal entities is worthy of attention, since the legal entity is not held criminally liable in the form of a punishment, but the state reacts in the form of criminal-legal measures. The application of criminal-legal measures against legal entities simultaneously with the prosecution of the perpetrator of a criminally illegal act is one additional means of combating the commission of criminal offenses, including regarding participants in criminal proceedings. The unconditional progressiveness of establishing in the current Criminal Code of Ukraine the norms on the application of measures of criminal legal influence to legal entities is confirmed, as evidenced by the successful experience of some member states of the European Union. The application of a specific measure of criminal legal influence to a legal entity is determined by the court in the indictment in which the natural authorized person is found guilty of committing on behalf and/or in the interests of such a legal entity one of the criminal offenses provided for in Art. 96-3 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and she was assigned a specific type and amount of punishment. The specified measures of a criminal legal nature are a specific means of bringing legal entities in criminal proceedings to the so-called "quasi-criminal responsibility", which is undoubtedly an additional tool for the prevention and prevention of criminal offenses, including and regarding subjects of criminal proceedings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在打击对刑事诉讼参与者实施刑事犯罪的背景下对法律实体适用刑法措施的问题
本文在研究预防和打击对刑事诉讼参与者实施刑事犯罪的个别犯罪学问题时,专门讨论了对法律实体适用刑法措施的问题。文章提请注意,实施刑事犯罪并不是适用《乌克兰刑法典》规定的某些其他刑事法律措施的唯一和排他性原因。特别是,实施某些仅在表面上与刑事犯罪相似的行为的事实也可以成为这样的理由。在这种情况下,对法律实体采取强制性刑事法律措施的问题值得关注,因为法律实体并没有以惩罚的形式承担刑事责任,而是国家以刑事法律措施的形式做出反应。在起诉刑事违法行为实施者的同时对法律实体采取刑事法律措施,是打击刑事犯罪(包括 刑事诉讼参与者)的又一手段。一些欧盟成员国的成功经验证明,在乌克兰现行《刑法典》中确立对法律实体实施刑事法律影响措施的规范具有无条件的渐进性。对法律实体适用特定的刑事法律影响措施由法院在起诉书中确定,在起诉书中,自然人被认定代表和/或为该法律实体的利益实施了《乌克兰刑法典》第 96-3 条规定的刑事犯罪之一。乌克兰刑法典》第 96-3 条规定的刑事犯罪之一,并对其处以特定种类和数额的惩罚。刑事法律性质的具体措施是在刑事诉讼中使法律实体承担所谓 "准刑事责 任 "的具体手段,无疑是预防和防止刑事犯罪的额外工具,包括和涉及刑事诉讼主 体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal regulation of the status of prisoners of war in accordance with the standards of international humanitarian law: historical and modern retrospective Peculiarities of the administrative and legal status of judicial bodies as subjects of protection of the citizens right of an environment safe for life and health in Ukraine Problems of applying criminal law measures to legal entities in the context of combating the commission of criminal offenses against participants in criminal proceedings Current trends of digitalization of public administration Mediation as an alternative way of resolving family disputes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1