{"title":"Depoliticizing the Modern Nation","authors":"Lucija Balikić","doi":"10.47074/hsce.2023-2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking the case of the interwar Yugoslav Sokol (Sokol Kraljevine Jugoslavije), this article examines the complex relationship between the discourses of organic nationhood and political socialization in what was the largest voluntary association in the country. While Sokol typically projected a vision of itself as an apolitical entity—as it claimed to represent the organic national body—this article will explore the dynamics, as well as contradictions, between such discourses and the socio-political reality they aimed to describe and eventually alter in their pursuit of improving the ‘national body.’ In conversation with scholarship on the conceptual history of modern East Central European nationalisms, including the social history of ideas and movements and political socialization more specifically, this article provides insight into the contextual, conceptual history of nationhood by focusing on selected thinkers engaged in Sokol, against the backdrop of particular mass practices and modes of political socialization in the organization. The tension between the involvement of the masses in the allegedly apolitical formations and the reality of subjecting them to political socialization en masse provides the central axis around which the argument is organized. The article concludes that their concept of nationhood was intimately intertwined with that of democracy and simultaneously posited against (party) politics and statism. Moreover, it demonstrates that Sokol was rooted in notions of civilizational hierarchies and directly linked to producing modern political subjects for the new Yugoslav state by means of the gymnastic and educational practices they promoted and conducted.","PeriodicalId":267555,"journal":{"name":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","volume":"58 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Studies on Central Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47074/hsce.2023-2.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Taking the case of the interwar Yugoslav Sokol (Sokol Kraljevine Jugoslavije), this article examines the complex relationship between the discourses of organic nationhood and political socialization in what was the largest voluntary association in the country. While Sokol typically projected a vision of itself as an apolitical entity—as it claimed to represent the organic national body—this article will explore the dynamics, as well as contradictions, between such discourses and the socio-political reality they aimed to describe and eventually alter in their pursuit of improving the ‘national body.’ In conversation with scholarship on the conceptual history of modern East Central European nationalisms, including the social history of ideas and movements and political socialization more specifically, this article provides insight into the contextual, conceptual history of nationhood by focusing on selected thinkers engaged in Sokol, against the backdrop of particular mass practices and modes of political socialization in the organization. The tension between the involvement of the masses in the allegedly apolitical formations and the reality of subjecting them to political socialization en masse provides the central axis around which the argument is organized. The article concludes that their concept of nationhood was intimately intertwined with that of democracy and simultaneously posited against (party) politics and statism. Moreover, it demonstrates that Sokol was rooted in notions of civilizational hierarchies and directly linked to producing modern political subjects for the new Yugoslav state by means of the gymnastic and educational practices they promoted and conducted.
本文以战时南斯拉夫索科尔协会(Sokol Kraljevine Jugoslavije)为例,探讨了这个国家最大的志愿协会中有机民族性与政治社会化话语之间的复杂关系。索科尔通常将自己视为一个非政治实体--因为它声称自己代表着有机的民族身体--本文将探讨这些话语与他们旨在描述并最终改变的社会政治现实之间的动态和矛盾,以追求改善 "民族身体"。本文与现代中东欧各国民族主义概念史(包括思想和运动的社会史以及更具体的政治社会化)的学术研究相结合,在索科尔组织中特定的群众实践和政治社会化模式的背景下,通过对参与索科尔组织的部分思想家的研究,深入探讨了民族性的背景和概念史。文章围绕群众参与所谓的非政治组织与使群众大规模接受政治社会化的现实之间的矛盾展开论述。文章的结论是,他们的民族概念与民主概念密切相关,同时又反对(政党)政治和国家主义。此外,文章还证明索科尔植根于文明等级观念,并通过其推广和开展的体操和教育实践,与为新南斯拉夫国家培养现代政治主体直接相关。