Exodus 20:5 in light of the teaching on retribution in the neo-Pentecostal churches in Nigeria

S. Ademiluka
{"title":"Exodus 20:5 in light of the teaching on retribution in the neo-Pentecostal churches in Nigeria","authors":"S. Ademiluka","doi":"10.4102/ids.v57i1.2958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of God punishing children for the sins of their parents in Exodus 20:5 sounds contrary to divine justice as represented in the Old Testament (OT). However, despite the apparent contradiction, strands of Christianity have continued to hold the view of retribution in Exodus. In Nigeria, it is reflected in the teaching on breaking generational curses in the neo-Pentecostal churches. This article has critically examined Exodus 20:5 as a basis for this doctrine, employing the historical-critical and descriptive methods. Contrary to the claim by some scholars that the doctrine of collective responsibility in Exodus 20:5 contradicts individual retribution that is found in Ezekiel and Jeremiah, this article found that these prophets express collective responsibility when they attribute the exile to the sins of the ancestors. Moreover, the belief in corporate responsibility continued to be held among the Jews after the exile. The teaching on generational curses in Nigeria is partly a reflection of the continuing influence of Exodus 20:5. This article concluded, however, that deducing the doctrine of generational curses from the Exodus text fails to take cognisance of the folkloristic character of Exodus. Given this character, the words visiting the iniquity of parents upon the children are those of the narrator, and not of God.Contribution: Contributing to the scholarly discourse on the notion of inherited punishment in Exodus 20:5, this article postulates that it is hermeneutically incorrect to base the belief in generational curses on this text.","PeriodicalId":510153,"journal":{"name":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","volume":"104 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v57i1.2958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The idea of God punishing children for the sins of their parents in Exodus 20:5 sounds contrary to divine justice as represented in the Old Testament (OT). However, despite the apparent contradiction, strands of Christianity have continued to hold the view of retribution in Exodus. In Nigeria, it is reflected in the teaching on breaking generational curses in the neo-Pentecostal churches. This article has critically examined Exodus 20:5 as a basis for this doctrine, employing the historical-critical and descriptive methods. Contrary to the claim by some scholars that the doctrine of collective responsibility in Exodus 20:5 contradicts individual retribution that is found in Ezekiel and Jeremiah, this article found that these prophets express collective responsibility when they attribute the exile to the sins of the ancestors. Moreover, the belief in corporate responsibility continued to be held among the Jews after the exile. The teaching on generational curses in Nigeria is partly a reflection of the continuing influence of Exodus 20:5. This article concluded, however, that deducing the doctrine of generational curses from the Exodus text fails to take cognisance of the folkloristic character of Exodus. Given this character, the words visiting the iniquity of parents upon the children are those of the narrator, and not of God.Contribution: Contributing to the scholarly discourse on the notion of inherited punishment in Exodus 20:5, this article postulates that it is hermeneutically incorrect to base the belief in generational curses on this text.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从尼日利亚新五旬节派教会中关于报应的教义看出埃及记 20:5
出埃及记》20:5 中上帝因父母的罪而惩罚子女的观点听起来与《旧约》(OT)中所体现的神的正义背道而驰。然而,尽管存在明显的矛盾,基督教各派仍然坚持《出埃及记》中的报应观点。在尼日利亚,这反映在新五旬节派教会关于打破世代诅咒的教义中。本文采用历史批判和描述的方法,批判性地研究了出埃及记第 20 章第 5 节这一教义的基础。有些学者认为《出埃及记》20:5 中的集体责任学说与《以西结书》和《耶利米书》中的个人报应相矛盾,与此相反,本文发现这些先知在将流亡归因于祖先的罪时表达了集体责任。此外,犹太人在流亡之后仍然相信集体责任。尼日利亚关于世代诅咒的教义在一定程度上反映了《出埃及记》20:5 的持续影响。然而,本文的结论是,从《出埃及记》文本中推导出世代相传的诅咒学说没有考虑到《出埃及记》的民俗学特征。鉴于这一特点,将父母的不义加诸子女的话语是叙述者的话语,而不是上帝的话语:本文为学术界对《出埃及记》20:5 中遗传惩罚概念的讨论做出了贡献,认为将世代诅咒的信仰建立在这段经文之上在诠释学上是不正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geslachtsgemeenschap zonder huwelijk als een multidimensionale zonde Transhumanism as a positional good, economic inequality, and a response from Christian ethics Missional precepts of the jubilee as an incentive to address poverty in South Africa and beyond Theological ethics expressed through Setswana proverbs: Another way of decolonising theology God’s acts in Lukan-Acts: God’s active involvement in the execution of the plan of salvation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1