Transhumanism as a positional good, economic inequality, and a response from Christian ethics

M. Kotzé
{"title":"Transhumanism as a positional good, economic inequality, and a response from Christian ethics","authors":"M. Kotzé","doi":"10.4102/ids.v58i1.3072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ethical responses to transhumanism, even from secular points of departure, often use religious language in debating the merits of discussion, and phrases such as ‘playing God’ or ‘hubris’ are not rare. Having Christian ethics and theology as one of the respondents to the ethical and moral issues that are raised by biotechnological developments such as transhumanism, is therefore perhaps easier than in other ethical concerns. In this contribution, the discourse on transhumanism will be approached by defining it in economic terms as a positional good. The focus will further be on the notion of economic inequality, and why it should matter in an ethical discussion on transhumanism, particularly from the perspective of Christian ethics. In making this case, the notion of solidarity will especially be drawn on as articulated in liberation theology as a theological resource. Social community is part and parcel of the Christian moral imperative and, as such, within the context of the discussion on economic inequality and transhumanism, the theological theme of solidarity forms an integral part of responding.Contribution: This article aims to contribute to the Christian ethical discussion on transhumanism by including an economic definition of transhumanism and situating the discussion within the field of liberation theology. The contribution also lies in centring the ethical issues around the theological theme of human solidarity and social community as a Christian moral imperative.","PeriodicalId":510153,"journal":{"name":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","volume":"78 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v58i1.3072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ethical responses to transhumanism, even from secular points of departure, often use religious language in debating the merits of discussion, and phrases such as ‘playing God’ or ‘hubris’ are not rare. Having Christian ethics and theology as one of the respondents to the ethical and moral issues that are raised by biotechnological developments such as transhumanism, is therefore perhaps easier than in other ethical concerns. In this contribution, the discourse on transhumanism will be approached by defining it in economic terms as a positional good. The focus will further be on the notion of economic inequality, and why it should matter in an ethical discussion on transhumanism, particularly from the perspective of Christian ethics. In making this case, the notion of solidarity will especially be drawn on as articulated in liberation theology as a theological resource. Social community is part and parcel of the Christian moral imperative and, as such, within the context of the discussion on economic inequality and transhumanism, the theological theme of solidarity forms an integral part of responding.Contribution: This article aims to contribute to the Christian ethical discussion on transhumanism by including an economic definition of transhumanism and situating the discussion within the field of liberation theology. The contribution also lies in centring the ethical issues around the theological theme of human solidarity and social community as a Christian moral imperative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超人类主义作为一种地位上的好处、经济不平等以及基督教伦理的回应
对超人主义的伦理回应,即使是从世俗的出发点,在辩论讨论的利弊时也经常使用宗教语言,诸如 "扮演上帝 "或 "狂妄自大 "之类的措辞并不罕见。因此,让基督教伦理和神学作为超人类主义等生物技术发展所引发的伦理和道德问题的回应者之一,也许比其他伦理问题更容易。在本文中,关于超人类主义的讨论将从经济学角度将其定义为一种有地位的物品。重点将进一步放在经济不平等的概念上,以及为什么在关于超人类主义的伦理讨论中,特别是从基督教伦理的角度来看,经济不平等应该是重要的。在论证过程中,将特别借鉴解放神学中阐述的团结概念,将其作为神学资源。社会共同体是基督教道德要求的重要组成部分,因此,在关于经济不平等和超人类主义的讨论中,团结这一神学主题构成了回应不可分割的一部分:本文旨在通过对超人主义进行经济学定义,并将讨论置于解放神学领域内,为基督教关于超人主义的伦理讨论做出贡献。本文的贡献还在于将伦理问题围绕人类团结和社会共同体这一神学主题展开,将其作为基督教的道德要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geslachtsgemeenschap zonder huwelijk als een multidimensionale zonde Transhumanism as a positional good, economic inequality, and a response from Christian ethics Missional precepts of the jubilee as an incentive to address poverty in South Africa and beyond Theological ethics expressed through Setswana proverbs: Another way of decolonising theology God’s acts in Lukan-Acts: God’s active involvement in the execution of the plan of salvation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1