The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: A Sociological Approach

Alena D. Donika
{"title":"The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: A Sociological Approach","authors":"Alena D. Donika","doi":"10.19163/2070-1586-2023-16-2-26-31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: to create effective mechanisms for state regulation of potential moral challenges caused by the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, it is of practical interest to study the attitude of society to this problem. The purpose of the work is a sociological analysis of the attitude of the Russian society to the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies. Materials and methods: A comprehensive analysis of data from open access databases of All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion was carried out. The materials of sociological surveys for the period 2007 to 2023 were used. Data weighted by socio-demographic parameters. Results: The majority of respondents believe that AI cannot completely replace humans (78 %). The greatest fears of the population (noted by 50–65 % of respondents) are associated with the loss of personal data and violation of privacy boundaries, the loss of personal responsibility for erroneous actions. Every third noted the risks of violation of civil rights and social guarantees (\"increases inequality\", \"violates the balance of interests of society and the individual\"), potential ethical problems (\"artificial intelligence has no morals and ethics\" – 32 %). Conclusion: Distrust of AI technologies is associated with an understanding of the social risks of their integration and an awareness of the loss of human values of communication, creativity, and individuality. Particular risks in this context are presented for social institutions of education and healthcare, where the loss of interpersonal communication calls into question the manifestation of empathy, sympathy and compassion.","PeriodicalId":505111,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics journal","volume":"96 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19163/2070-1586-2023-16-2-26-31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: to create effective mechanisms for state regulation of potential moral challenges caused by the widespread introduction of artificial intelligence technologies, it is of practical interest to study the attitude of society to this problem. The purpose of the work is a sociological analysis of the attitude of the Russian society to the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies. Materials and methods: A comprehensive analysis of data from open access databases of All-Russian Center for the Study of Public Opinion was carried out. The materials of sociological surveys for the period 2007 to 2023 were used. Data weighted by socio-demographic parameters. Results: The majority of respondents believe that AI cannot completely replace humans (78 %). The greatest fears of the population (noted by 50–65 % of respondents) are associated with the loss of personal data and violation of privacy boundaries, the loss of personal responsibility for erroneous actions. Every third noted the risks of violation of civil rights and social guarantees ("increases inequality", "violates the balance of interests of society and the individual"), potential ethical problems ("artificial intelligence has no morals and ethics" – 32 %). Conclusion: Distrust of AI technologies is associated with an understanding of the social risks of their integration and an awareness of the loss of human values of communication, creativity, and individuality. Particular risks in this context are presented for social institutions of education and healthcare, where the loss of interpersonal communication calls into question the manifestation of empathy, sympathy and compassion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能的伦理:社会学方法
背景:为了建立有效的国家监管机制,应对人工智能技术的广泛引入所带来的潜在道德挑战,研究社会对这一问题的态度具有现实意义。本文旨在从社会学角度分析俄罗斯社会对引入人工智能技术的态度。 材料与方法对来自全俄社会舆论研究中心开放数据库的数据进行了综合分析。使用的是 2007 年至 2023 年期间的社会学调查材料。数据按社会人口参数加权。 结果显示大多数受访者认为人工智能无法完全取代人类(78%)。人们(50%-65% 的受访者)最担心的是个人数据丢失、隐私边界被侵犯、个人对错误行为失去责任。三分之一的受访者指出了侵犯公民权利和社会保障的风险("加剧不平等"、"破坏社会和个人利益的平衡"),以及潜在的道德问题("人工智能没有道德和伦理"--32%)。 结论对人工智能技术的不信任与对其融合的社会风险的理解以及对交流、创造力和个性等人类价值丧失的认识有关。在这种情况下,教育和医疗保健等社会机构面临的风险尤为突出,因为在这些机构中,人际交往的缺失会对同理心、同情心和怜悯心的体现产生质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modern aspects of deontology in dentistry Interdisciplinary connections in the teaching of bioethics Problems of norm and pathology in the sociology of health Ethical and legal responsibility of medical organizations and medical workers for causing harm to the life and health of patients while carry-ing out professional activities Bioethical deconstruction of the phenomenon of evil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1