Northeastern bakers' views on organic and regeneratively certified flours

Karen Simons
{"title":"Northeastern bakers' views on organic and regeneratively certified flours","authors":"Karen Simons","doi":"10.5304/jafscd.2023.131.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a continued interest in reviving small and midsize grain mills that allow for more differenti­ated flour offerings, including mills with environ­mental benefits. This study seeks to assess North­eastern bakers’ and distributors’ views on U.S. Department of Agriculture–certified organic flour and potential demand for flour with the Regenera­tive Organic certification by conducting a survey of bakers and distributors. Results provide evidence that, for multiple reasons, many bakers use both conventional and certified organic flours despite the fact that they cannot call the final product organic and, if budgets allowed, would increase organic flour purchases. Bakers and distributors believe customers do not understand the impor­tance of the organic certification, that customers need to be educated on the Regenerative Organic Certified label, and that bakers would switch to flour with a Regenerative Organic certification if quality and price were comparable to organic.","PeriodicalId":505953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development","volume":"48 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2023.131.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a continued interest in reviving small and midsize grain mills that allow for more differenti­ated flour offerings, including mills with environ­mental benefits. This study seeks to assess North­eastern bakers’ and distributors’ views on U.S. Department of Agriculture–certified organic flour and potential demand for flour with the Regenera­tive Organic certification by conducting a survey of bakers and distributors. Results provide evidence that, for multiple reasons, many bakers use both conventional and certified organic flours despite the fact that they cannot call the final product organic and, if budgets allowed, would increase organic flour purchases. Bakers and distributors believe customers do not understand the impor­tance of the organic certification, that customers need to be educated on the Regenerative Organic Certified label, and that bakers would switch to flour with a Regenerative Organic certification if quality and price were comparable to organic.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东北面包师对有机和再生认证面粉的看法
人们对振兴中小型谷物加工厂持续保持兴趣,因为这样可以提供更多差异化的面粉,包括具有环境效益的加工厂。本研究通过对面包师和经销商进行调查,评估东北部面包师和经销商对美国农业部认证有机面粉的看法,以及对获得再生有机认证的面粉的潜在需求。调查结果表明,出于多种原因,许多面包师同时使用传统面粉和经认证的有机面粉,尽管他们不能将最终产品称为有机面粉,如果预算允许,他们会增加有机面粉的购买量。面包师和分销商认为,客户并不了解有机认证的重要性,需要对客户进行再生有机认证标签方面的教育,如果质量和价格与有机面粉相当,面包师会改用获得再生有机认证的面粉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“What does Ferguson mean for the food justice movement?”: Reading Black visions of food justice in times of social unrest In This Issue: Commentaries from the 2023 Agroecology Summit in the U.S., and open-call papers From market concentration to political corruption [Book review] Challenging agricultural norms and diversifying actors: Building transformative public policy for equitable food systems Barriers and opportunities to agrihood development in growing cities of the Rocky Mountain region: A comparative case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1