“The Wrong Migration:” The Problem of Managing Migration Flows in the Nordic Countries Politics

E. D. Pronyakina
{"title":"“The Wrong Migration:” The Problem of Managing Migration Flows in the Nordic Countries Politics","authors":"E. D. Pronyakina","doi":"10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3-58-73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the modern world, migration crises are likely to become commonplace. Denmark, Norway and Sweden are countries that attract migrants from both European and non-European countries. Today they face the diffi cult task of developing a common migration policy, which is hindered by a number of reasons: economic, ideological and political. The article attempts to assess the prospects for cooperation between the Scandinavian countries on migration issues in the near future. Based on the provisions of the Copenhagen School of Security, the author examines mass migration through the prism of the risks it poses to the culturally homogeneous societies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, to the unique Scandinavian model of the welfare state and to Nordic Co-operation. Comparing the Nordic countries’ approaches to migration management, the author concludes that they are united by the excessive involvement of the state in the processes of adaptation and integration of migrants. Despite the fact that the migration policies of the three countries have undergone signifi cant changes since 2016, the emphasis is still on the management of quantitative indicators (through the issuance of residence permits or deportation) rather than on the creation of social partnerships between migrants and natives. In Danish, Norwegian and even Swedish society, the idea of the need to promote “right” (European) immigration and limit “wrong” (foreign cultural) immigration prevails. There is a situation in which the main integration eff orts are directed at those groups of immigrants who are already suffi ciently integrated. Non-European migrants, regardless of their professional qualifi cations or personal qualities, are still perceived as a threat to Nordic identity.","PeriodicalId":506402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Analytics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3-58-73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the modern world, migration crises are likely to become commonplace. Denmark, Norway and Sweden are countries that attract migrants from both European and non-European countries. Today they face the diffi cult task of developing a common migration policy, which is hindered by a number of reasons: economic, ideological and political. The article attempts to assess the prospects for cooperation between the Scandinavian countries on migration issues in the near future. Based on the provisions of the Copenhagen School of Security, the author examines mass migration through the prism of the risks it poses to the culturally homogeneous societies of Denmark, Norway and Sweden, to the unique Scandinavian model of the welfare state and to Nordic Co-operation. Comparing the Nordic countries’ approaches to migration management, the author concludes that they are united by the excessive involvement of the state in the processes of adaptation and integration of migrants. Despite the fact that the migration policies of the three countries have undergone signifi cant changes since 2016, the emphasis is still on the management of quantitative indicators (through the issuance of residence permits or deportation) rather than on the creation of social partnerships between migrants and natives. In Danish, Norwegian and even Swedish society, the idea of the need to promote “right” (European) immigration and limit “wrong” (foreign cultural) immigration prevails. There is a situation in which the main integration eff orts are directed at those groups of immigrants who are already suffi ciently integrated. Non-European migrants, regardless of their professional qualifi cations or personal qualities, are still perceived as a threat to Nordic identity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"错误的移民管理北欧国家移民潮的问题 政治
在当今世界,移民危机很可能变得司空见惯。丹麦、挪威和瑞典是吸引欧洲和非欧洲国家移民的国家。如今,它们面临着制定共同移民政策的艰巨任务,而这一任务受到经济、意识形态和政治等多种原因的阻碍。本文试图评估斯堪的纳维亚国家近期在移民问题上的合作前景。根据哥本哈根安全学派的规定,作者从大规模移民对丹麦、挪威和瑞典的同质文化社会、独特的斯堪的纳维亚福利国家模式以及北欧合作所带来的风险的角度,对其进行了研究。通过比较北欧国家的移民管理方法,作者得出结论,这些国家的共同点是国家在移民适应和融入过程中的过度参与。尽管这三个国家的移民政策自2016年以来发生了重大变化,但重点仍然是对量化指标的管理(通过发放居留证或驱逐出境),而不是在移民和本地人之间建立社会伙伴关系。在丹麦、挪威甚至瑞典社会中,需要促进 "正确的"(欧洲的)移民和限制 "错误的"(外国文化的)移民的观念盛行。在这种情况下,主要的融合努力是针对那些已经充分融合的移民群体。非欧洲移民,无论其专业素质或个人品质如何,仍被视为对北欧特性的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronavirus Pandemic in Georgia: Between Church and Vaccination “Nuclear Winter” Hypothesis Research and Responsibilities in Nuclear Policy Climate Change as a New Factor of International Relations EU Climate Leadership: Contradictions Inherent in Carbon Regulation Energy Diplomacy in the Era of Energy Transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1