Mutáció és eltűnés. A térbeliség kategóriájának útja a hartmanni rétegfelépítményben

Tamás Beck
{"title":"Mutáció és eltűnés. A térbeliség kategóriájának útja a hartmanni rétegfelépítményben","authors":"Tamás Beck","doi":"10.61901/kellek.2023.69.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The primary aim of my paper is to show how the category of spatiality appears at different levels of the strata structure outlined by Nicolai Hartmann. As a starting point, Hartmann’s connection to the Cartesian tradition leads directly to the misunderstanding that manifests itself in the accusation of hypostasis. In order to dispel this misunderstanding, I examine whether we can attach greater importance to the boundary marking the beginning of life than to the boundary between the organic and spiritual layers of existence, which is characterized, among other things, by the disappearance of the category of spatiality and the increased dominance of nova. In order to clarify this, the distinction between organic and inorganic layers of existence inevitably needs to be clarified. Next, I explain that the appearance of life on the second stage of Hartmann’s construction is devoid of any vital tendencies, and I attempt to prove that, although Hartmann draws a sharp line between the second and third layers of existence, this caesura does not result in psychophysical dualism in his system. Then I will show that the category of spatiality is already distorted shortly before its disappearance, while the living organism comes into contact with its own environment. Of course, the indirect assertion of spatiality can also be detected in non-spatial layers of existence, but its direct manifestation has interdisciplinary implications, and it can also be connected with the method of phenomenology, which I must discuss in detail. Finally, I point to the ontological consequences of the disappearance of the category in question, making it clear that the Platonic conception of existence associated with spatiality is inadequate for grasping intangible beings. After a brief description of Heidegger’s attempt, I will point out that the successful integration of intellectual entities into reality is carried out precisely by Hartmann through the real time’s ability to unite.","PeriodicalId":508302,"journal":{"name":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kellék. Filozófiai folyóirat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61901/kellek.2023.69.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary aim of my paper is to show how the category of spatiality appears at different levels of the strata structure outlined by Nicolai Hartmann. As a starting point, Hartmann’s connection to the Cartesian tradition leads directly to the misunderstanding that manifests itself in the accusation of hypostasis. In order to dispel this misunderstanding, I examine whether we can attach greater importance to the boundary marking the beginning of life than to the boundary between the organic and spiritual layers of existence, which is characterized, among other things, by the disappearance of the category of spatiality and the increased dominance of nova. In order to clarify this, the distinction between organic and inorganic layers of existence inevitably needs to be clarified. Next, I explain that the appearance of life on the second stage of Hartmann’s construction is devoid of any vital tendencies, and I attempt to prove that, although Hartmann draws a sharp line between the second and third layers of existence, this caesura does not result in psychophysical dualism in his system. Then I will show that the category of spatiality is already distorted shortly before its disappearance, while the living organism comes into contact with its own environment. Of course, the indirect assertion of spatiality can also be detected in non-spatial layers of existence, but its direct manifestation has interdisciplinary implications, and it can also be connected with the method of phenomenology, which I must discuss in detail. Finally, I point to the ontological consequences of the disappearance of the category in question, making it clear that the Platonic conception of existence associated with spatiality is inadequate for grasping intangible beings. After a brief description of Heidegger’s attempt, I will point out that the successful integration of intellectual entities into reality is carried out precisely by Hartmann through the real time’s ability to unite.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变异与消失。哈特曼分层中的空间性范畴之路
我的论文的主要目的是说明空间性范畴是如何出现在尼古拉-哈特曼所勾勒的阶层结构的不同层次上的。作为起点,哈特曼与笛卡尔传统的联系直接导致了误解,而这种误解表现为对hypostasis的指责。为了消除这种误解,我研究了我们是否可以更加重视标志着生命开始的边界,而不是存在的有机层和精神层之间的边界,后者的特点之一是空间性范畴的消失和 "新"(nova)主导地位的增强。为了澄清这一点,不可避免地需要澄清存在的有机层和无机层之间的区别。接下来,我将解释哈特曼构建的第二阶段生命的出现是没有任何生命倾向的,并试图证明,尽管哈特曼在存在的第二层和第三层之间划出了一条鲜明的界限,但这一弧度并没有在他的体系中导致精神物理二元论。然后,我将证明,当生物体与自身环境接触时,空间性范畴在其消失前不久就已经被扭曲了。当然,空间性的间接论断也可以在非空间的存在层中发现,但它的直接表现具有跨学科的意义,也可以与现象学的方法联系起来,这一点我必须详细讨论。最后,我指出了有关范畴消失的本体论后果,明确指出与空间性相关的柏拉图式存在概念不足以把握无形的存在。在简述海德格尔的尝试之后,我将指出,哈特曼正是通过现实时间的统一能力,成功地将知识实体融入现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Filozófiai észrevételek a nyugati világ alapértékeiről "Mediatizált közösségek, identitásformáló narratívák és változó hagyományfogalom az információ korában" Egyetemes érvényűek-e a nyugati hagyományból merített „európai értékek”? Az identitás maga az üzenet. A tömegmédiumok szerepe a nemzeti nagycsoportok identitásának hagyományozásában A hagyomány klasszikus és kortárs diskurzusai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1