TESTING MARKET EFFICIENCY: THE ROAD TO INTRINSIC VALUATION

Nenad Gajić, Vanja Grozdić, Jelena Demko-Rihter, Jarmila Duháček Šebestová
{"title":"TESTING MARKET EFFICIENCY: THE ROAD TO INTRINSIC VALUATION","authors":"Nenad Gajić, Vanja Grozdić, Jelena Demko-Rihter, Jarmila Duháček Šebestová","doi":"10.22190/fueo230717011g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paradigm of market equilibrium and the “efficient-market hypothesis” tied to it, dealing specifically with the behavior of capital markets, has no explanation for financial bubbles and their bursting that is leading to stock market crashes. Accordingly, the main goal of this paper is to discuss the inefficiency of markets, with examples of corporate decisions that directly abuse such inefficiency to psychologically motivate desired behavior of potential customers. To test the efficiency market hypothesis, we have used Stoxx Europe 600 index historical closing daily prices, for the period from 2012–2022. Using both non-parametric and parametric tests, such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, run–test for random order, and ARIMA regression, we reject the hypothesis that the market is efficient in a weak form because it doesn’t follow a random walk. Also, basic-level problems of economic theory were analyzed, emphasizing the view that perhaps the time has come to align the fundamentals of economic theory with basic concepts that have been used in practice for years.","PeriodicalId":508950,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization","volume":"21 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/fueo230717011g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paradigm of market equilibrium and the “efficient-market hypothesis” tied to it, dealing specifically with the behavior of capital markets, has no explanation for financial bubbles and their bursting that is leading to stock market crashes. Accordingly, the main goal of this paper is to discuss the inefficiency of markets, with examples of corporate decisions that directly abuse such inefficiency to psychologically motivate desired behavior of potential customers. To test the efficiency market hypothesis, we have used Stoxx Europe 600 index historical closing daily prices, for the period from 2012–2022. Using both non-parametric and parametric tests, such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, run–test for random order, and ARIMA regression, we reject the hypothesis that the market is efficient in a weak form because it doesn’t follow a random walk. Also, basic-level problems of economic theory were analyzed, emphasizing the view that perhaps the time has come to align the fundamentals of economic theory with basic concepts that have been used in practice for years.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检验市场效率:通往内在估值之路
市场均衡范式和与之相联系的 "有效市场假说 "专门涉及资本市场的行为,但无法解释金融泡沫及其破灭导致股市崩盘的原因。因此,本文的主要目标是讨论市场的低效率,并举例说明企业决策直接滥用这种低效率,从心理上激发潜在客户的预期行为。为了检验效率市场假说,我们使用了 Stoxx 欧洲 600 指数 2012-2022 年期间的历史每日收盘价。通过使用非参数和参数检验,如 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验、随机顺序运行检验和 ARIMA 回归,我们拒绝了市场因不遵循随机漫步而具有弱效率的假设。此外,我们还分析了经济理论的基本层面问题,强调或许是时候将经济理论的基本原理与多年来在实践中使用的基本概念统一起来了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
HEIR APPARENT PREPAREDNESS AND SELECTED FAMILY BUSINESS SUSTAINABILITY IN LAGOS STATE NIGERIA THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS PROCESSES WORKING CAPITAL AND TAX PAYABLE: ANALYSIS OF INTERRELATIONSHIP IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES LIQUIDITY-PROFITABILITY DYNAMICS: IS THE BANKING INDUSTRY RESILIENT IN TIMES OF CRISIS? ENTREPRENEURIAL ECOSYSTEM OF AGRICULTURAL SOCIAL FRANCHISING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1