Artificial intelligence for human gunshot wound classification

Jerome Cheng , Carl Schmidt , Allecia Wilson , Zixi Wang , Wei Hao , Joshua Pantanowitz , Catherine Morris , Randy Tashjian , Liron Pantanowitz
{"title":"Artificial intelligence for human gunshot wound classification","authors":"Jerome Cheng ,&nbsp;Carl Schmidt ,&nbsp;Allecia Wilson ,&nbsp;Zixi Wang ,&nbsp;Wei Hao ,&nbsp;Joshua Pantanowitz ,&nbsp;Catherine Morris ,&nbsp;Randy Tashjian ,&nbsp;Liron Pantanowitz","doi":"10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Certain features are helpful in the identification of gunshot entrance and exit wounds, such as the presence of muzzle imprints, peripheral tears, stippling, bone beveling, and wound border irregularity. Some cases are less straightforward and wounds can thus pose challenges to an emergency room doctor or forensic pathologist. In recent years, deep learning has shown promise in various automated medical image classification tasks.</p><p>This study explores the feasibility of using a deep learning model to classify entry and exit gunshot wounds in digital color images. A collection of 2418 images of entrance and exit gunshot wounds were procured. Of these, 2028 entrance and 1314 exit wounds were cropped, focusing on the area around each gunshot wound. A ConvNext Tiny deep learning model was trained using the Fastai deep learning library, with a train/validation split ratio of 70/30, until a maximum validation accuracy of 92.6% was achieved. An additional 415 entrance and 293 exit wound images were collected for the test (holdout) set. The model achieved an accuracy of 87.99%, precision of 83.99%, recall of 87.71%, and F1-score 85.81% on the holdout set. Correctly classified were 88.19% of entrance wounds and 87.71% of exit wounds. The results are comparable to what a forensic pathologist can achieve without other morphologic cues. This study represents one of the first applications of artificial intelligence to the field of forensic pathology. This work demonstrates that deep learning models can discern entrance and exit gunshot wounds in digital images with high accuracy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392300175X/pdfft?md5=e69bbf6eb449bdb360e3bbcbd84c9a3a&pid=1-s2.0-S215335392300175X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S215335392300175X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Certain features are helpful in the identification of gunshot entrance and exit wounds, such as the presence of muzzle imprints, peripheral tears, stippling, bone beveling, and wound border irregularity. Some cases are less straightforward and wounds can thus pose challenges to an emergency room doctor or forensic pathologist. In recent years, deep learning has shown promise in various automated medical image classification tasks.

This study explores the feasibility of using a deep learning model to classify entry and exit gunshot wounds in digital color images. A collection of 2418 images of entrance and exit gunshot wounds were procured. Of these, 2028 entrance and 1314 exit wounds were cropped, focusing on the area around each gunshot wound. A ConvNext Tiny deep learning model was trained using the Fastai deep learning library, with a train/validation split ratio of 70/30, until a maximum validation accuracy of 92.6% was achieved. An additional 415 entrance and 293 exit wound images were collected for the test (holdout) set. The model achieved an accuracy of 87.99%, precision of 83.99%, recall of 87.71%, and F1-score 85.81% on the holdout set. Correctly classified were 88.19% of entrance wounds and 87.71% of exit wounds. The results are comparable to what a forensic pathologist can achieve without other morphologic cues. This study represents one of the first applications of artificial intelligence to the field of forensic pathology. This work demonstrates that deep learning models can discern entrance and exit gunshot wounds in digital images with high accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于人体枪伤分类的人工智能
某些特征有助于识别枪弹出入伤口,如枪口印记、周边撕裂、条纹、骨斜面和伤口边缘不规则。有些情况则不那么简单,因此伤口会给急诊室医生或法医病理学家带来挑战。近年来,深度学习在各种自动医学图像分类任务中显示出了良好的前景。本研究探讨了使用深度学习模型对数字彩色图像中的入口和出口枪伤进行分类的可行性。本研究收集了 2418 幅入口和出口枪伤图像。对其中的 2028 个入口伤口和 1314 个出口伤口进行了裁剪,重点是每个枪伤周围的区域。使用 Fastai 深度学习库训练了 ConvNext Tiny 深度学习模型,训练/验证比例为 70/30,直到达到 92.6% 的最高验证准确率。另外还收集了 415 幅入口伤口图像和 293 幅出口伤口图像作为测试(保留)集。在保留集上,该模型的准确率为 87.99%,精确率为 83.99%,召回率为 87.71%,F1 分数为 85.81%。入口伤口的正确分类率为 88.19%,出口伤口的正确分类率为 87.71%。其结果与法医病理学家在没有其他形态线索的情况下所取得的结果相当。这项研究是人工智能在法医病理学领域的首次应用。这项工作表明,深度学习模型可以在数字图像中高精度地辨别入口和出口枪伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Informatics
Journal of Pathology Informatics Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology Informatics (JPI) is an open access peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the advancement of pathology informatics. This is the official journal of the Association for Pathology Informatics (API). The journal aims to publish broadly about pathology informatics and freely disseminate all articles worldwide. This journal is of interest to pathologists, informaticians, academics, researchers, health IT specialists, information officers, IT staff, vendors, and anyone with an interest in informatics. We encourage submissions from anyone with an interest in the field of pathology informatics. We publish all types of papers related to pathology informatics including original research articles, technical notes, reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, editorials, symposia, meeting abstracts, book reviews, and correspondence to the editors. All submissions are subject to rigorous peer review by the well-regarded editorial board and by expert referees in appropriate specialties.
期刊最新文献
Digital mapping of resected cancer specimens: The visual pathology report A precise machine learning model: Detecting cervical cancer using feature selection and explainable AI ViCE: An automated and quantitative program to assess intestinal tissue morphology Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology LVI-PathNet: Segmentation-classification pipeline for detection of lymphovascular invasion in whole slide images of lung adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1