Machine Learning Models in the large-scale prediction of parking space availability for sustainable cities

Abdoul Nasser Hamidou Soumana, M. ben Salah, S. Idbraim, A. Boulouz
{"title":"Machine Learning Models in the large-scale prediction of parking space availability for sustainable cities","authors":"Abdoul Nasser Hamidou Soumana, M. ben Salah, S. Idbraim, A. Boulouz","doi":"10.4108/eetiot.2269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The search for effective solutions to address traffic congestion presents a significant challenge for large urban cities. Analysis of urban traffic congestion has revealed that more than 70% of it can be attributed to prolonged searches for parking spaces. Consequently, accurate prediction of parking space availability in advance can play a vital role in assisting drivers to find vacant parking spaces quickly. Such solutions hold the potential to reduce traffic congestion and mitigate its detrimental impacts on the environment, economy, and public health. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for predicting parking space availability. However, comparative studies on those machine learning models to evaluate the best suited for a large-scale prediction and within a given prediction time period are missing.In this study, we compared nine machine learning algorithms to assess their efficiency in predicting long-term, large-scale parking space availability. Our comparison was based on two approaches: using on-street parking data alone and 2) incorporating data from external sources (such as weather data). We used automatic machine learning models to compare the performance of different algorithms according to the prediction efficiency and execution time. Our results indicated that the automated machine learning models implemented were well fitted to our data. Notably, the Extra Tree and Random Forest algorithms demonstrated the highest efficiency among the models tested. Moreover, we observed that the Random Forest algorithm exhibited less computational demand than the Extra Tree algorithm, making it particularly advantageous in terms of execution time. Therefore, this work suggests that the Random Forest algorithm is the most suitable machine learning model in terms of efficiency and execution time for accurately predicting large-scale, long-term parking space availability.","PeriodicalId":506477,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things","volume":"126 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.2269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search for effective solutions to address traffic congestion presents a significant challenge for large urban cities. Analysis of urban traffic congestion has revealed that more than 70% of it can be attributed to prolonged searches for parking spaces. Consequently, accurate prediction of parking space availability in advance can play a vital role in assisting drivers to find vacant parking spaces quickly. Such solutions hold the potential to reduce traffic congestion and mitigate its detrimental impacts on the environment, economy, and public health. Machine learning algorithms have emerged as promising approaches for predicting parking space availability. However, comparative studies on those machine learning models to evaluate the best suited for a large-scale prediction and within a given prediction time period are missing.In this study, we compared nine machine learning algorithms to assess their efficiency in predicting long-term, large-scale parking space availability. Our comparison was based on two approaches: using on-street parking data alone and 2) incorporating data from external sources (such as weather data). We used automatic machine learning models to compare the performance of different algorithms according to the prediction efficiency and execution time. Our results indicated that the automated machine learning models implemented were well fitted to our data. Notably, the Extra Tree and Random Forest algorithms demonstrated the highest efficiency among the models tested. Moreover, we observed that the Random Forest algorithm exhibited less computational demand than the Extra Tree algorithm, making it particularly advantageous in terms of execution time. Therefore, this work suggests that the Random Forest algorithm is the most suitable machine learning model in terms of efficiency and execution time for accurately predicting large-scale, long-term parking space availability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模预测可持续城市停车位可用性的机器学习模型
寻找解决交通拥堵问题的有效方案是大城市面临的一项重大挑战。对城市交通拥堵的分析表明,70%以上的交通拥堵可归因于长时间寻找停车位。因此,提前准确预测停车位的可用性对于帮助驾驶员快速找到空闲停车位至关重要。这种解决方案有可能减少交通拥堵,减轻其对环境、经济和公共健康的不利影响。机器学习算法已成为预测停车位可用性的有效方法。在本研究中,我们比较了九种机器学习算法,以评估它们在预测长期、大规模停车位可用性方面的效率。我们的比较基于两种方法:1)单独使用路边停车数据;2)结合外部数据源(如天气数据)。我们使用自动机器学习模型,根据预测效率和执行时间来比较不同算法的性能。结果表明,所实施的自动机器学习模型与我们的数据非常匹配。值得注意的是,在所测试的模型中, Extra Tree 算法和随机森林算法的效率最高。此外,我们还观察到,随机森林算法的计算需求低于额外树算法,因此在执行时间方面特别有优势。因此,这项工作表明,就效率和执行时间而言,随机森林算法是最适合用于准确预测大规模、长期停车位可用性的机器学习模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robust GAN-Based CNN Model as Generative AI Application for Deepfake Detection Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning Crime Prediction using Machine Learning Crime Prediction using Machine Learning Circumventing Stragglers and Staleness in Distributed CNN using LSTM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1