Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning

Rohit, Shri Ram Manda, Aditya Raj, Akshay Dheeraj, G. Rawat, Tanupriya Choudhury
{"title":"Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning","authors":"Rohit, Shri Ram Manda, Aditya Raj, Akshay Dheeraj, G. Rawat, Tanupriya Choudhury","doi":"10.4108/eetiot.5634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Reservoir characterisation and geomechanical modelling benefit significantly from diverse machine learning techniques, addressing complexities inherent in subsurface information. Accurate lithology identification is pivotal, furnishing crucial insights into subsurface geological formations. Lithology is pivotal in appraising hydrocarbon accumulation potential and optimising drilling strategies. \nOBJECTIVES: This study employs multiple machine learning models to discern lithology from the well-log data of the Volve Field. \nMETHODS: The well log data of the Volve field comprises of 10,220 data points with diverse features influencing the target variable, lithology. The dataset encompasses four primary lithologies—sandstone, limestone, marl, and claystone—constituting a complex subsurface stratum. Lithology identification is framed as a classification problem, and four distinct ML algorithms are deployed to train and assess the models, partitioning the dataset into a 7:3 ratio for training and testing, respectively. \nRESULTS: The resulting confusion matrix indicates a close alignment between predicted and true labels. While all algorithms exhibit favourable performance, the decision tree algorithm demonstrates the highest efficacy, yielding an exceptional overall accuracy of 0.98. \nCONCLUSION: Notably, this model's training spans diverse wells within the same basin, showcasing its capability to predict lithology within intricate strata. Additionally, its robustness positions it as a potential tool for identifying other properties of rock formations.","PeriodicalId":506477,"journal":{"name":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things","volume":"55 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetiot.5634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Reservoir characterisation and geomechanical modelling benefit significantly from diverse machine learning techniques, addressing complexities inherent in subsurface information. Accurate lithology identification is pivotal, furnishing crucial insights into subsurface geological formations. Lithology is pivotal in appraising hydrocarbon accumulation potential and optimising drilling strategies. OBJECTIVES: This study employs multiple machine learning models to discern lithology from the well-log data of the Volve Field. METHODS: The well log data of the Volve field comprises of 10,220 data points with diverse features influencing the target variable, lithology. The dataset encompasses four primary lithologies—sandstone, limestone, marl, and claystone—constituting a complex subsurface stratum. Lithology identification is framed as a classification problem, and four distinct ML algorithms are deployed to train and assess the models, partitioning the dataset into a 7:3 ratio for training and testing, respectively. RESULTS: The resulting confusion matrix indicates a close alignment between predicted and true labels. While all algorithms exhibit favourable performance, the decision tree algorithm demonstrates the highest efficacy, yielding an exceptional overall accuracy of 0.98. CONCLUSION: Notably, this model's training spans diverse wells within the same basin, showcasing its capability to predict lithology within intricate strata. Additionally, its robustness positions it as a potential tool for identifying other properties of rock formations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习从测井数据中识别岩性
简介:储层特征描述和地质力学建模极大地受益于各种机器学习技术,解决了地下信息固有的复杂性。准确的岩性识别至关重要,可提供对地下地质构造的重要见解。岩性在评估碳氢化合物积累潜力和优化钻井策略方面至关重要。目标:本研究采用多种机器学习模型,从 Volve 油田的井记录数据中识别岩性。方法:Volve 油田的测井数据包括 10,220 个数据点,这些数据点具有影响目标变量(岩性)的各种特征。数据集包括四种主要岩性--砂岩、石灰岩、泥灰岩和粘土岩,构成了复杂的地下地层。岩性识别是一个分类问题,采用四种不同的 ML 算法来训练和评估模型,将数据集按 7:3 的比例分别用于训练和测试。结果:产生的混淆矩阵表明,预测标签和真实标签之间的吻合度很高。虽然所有算法都表现出了良好的性能,但决策树算法的效率最高,总体准确率达到了 0.98。结论:值得注意的是,该模型的训练跨越了同一盆地的不同油井,展示了其预测复杂地层岩性的能力。此外,该模型的稳健性使其成为识别岩层其他属性的潜在工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robust GAN-Based CNN Model as Generative AI Application for Deepfake Detection Identification of Lithology from Well Log Data Using Machine Learning Crime Prediction using Machine Learning Crime Prediction using Machine Learning Circumventing Stragglers and Staleness in Distributed CNN using LSTM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1