Validation of women abuse screening tool (WAST-S) in the Mozambique National Health Service (significance for HIV prevention and ART treatment Adherence): A quasi-experimental crossover study

Matavel Joaquim, Munguambe Khátia, Loquiha Osvaldo
{"title":"Validation of women abuse screening tool (WAST-S) in the Mozambique National Health Service (significance for HIV prevention and ART treatment Adherence): A quasi-experimental crossover study","authors":"Matavel Joaquim, Munguambe Khátia, Loquiha Osvaldo","doi":"10.5897/jahr2023.0561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intimate partner violence (IPV), includes a wide range of abusive behaviors perpetrated by someone involved or who was involved in an intimate relationship with the victim. It is a serious and preventable public health problem globally. This article reports on the validation of an adaptation of the Women Abuse Screening Tool (WAST-S) in Mozambique and recommends its application for more effective prevention and ART treatment. The study utilized a quantitative approach in a prospective quasi-experimental crossover design, in which clusters, 4 health care units, were allocated to two intervention approaches in reverse order. IPV was measured using a translated, culturally-adapted version of WAST-S. This was compared to a standard clinical interview that included questions on IPV. There was a good agreement between the scales of WAST-Short and the standard clinical interview: 0.235 (95% CI: 0.219 - 0.250). The WAST-Short was found to be more effective than the standard clinical interview as an IPV screening tool. It provides information about intimate relationships and can measure the presence of violence. The standard clinical interview is less effective at obtaining this information. WAST-S proved to be a more reliable instrument than a clinically adapted interview, and can be applied in the screening of IPV in high patient volume settings and efficiently implemented in primary health care units which can then refer patients for specialized care. The two questions of the WAST-S provide insight into the intimate relationship measuring the presence of violence, information not easily accessible by the standard clinical interview. This information when provided to clinicians has the potential for assuring more effective prevention and treatment adherence.","PeriodicalId":14897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AIDS and HIV Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AIDS and HIV Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/jahr2023.0561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV), includes a wide range of abusive behaviors perpetrated by someone involved or who was involved in an intimate relationship with the victim. It is a serious and preventable public health problem globally. This article reports on the validation of an adaptation of the Women Abuse Screening Tool (WAST-S) in Mozambique and recommends its application for more effective prevention and ART treatment. The study utilized a quantitative approach in a prospective quasi-experimental crossover design, in which clusters, 4 health care units, were allocated to two intervention approaches in reverse order. IPV was measured using a translated, culturally-adapted version of WAST-S. This was compared to a standard clinical interview that included questions on IPV. There was a good agreement between the scales of WAST-Short and the standard clinical interview: 0.235 (95% CI: 0.219 - 0.250). The WAST-Short was found to be more effective than the standard clinical interview as an IPV screening tool. It provides information about intimate relationships and can measure the presence of violence. The standard clinical interview is less effective at obtaining this information. WAST-S proved to be a more reliable instrument than a clinically adapted interview, and can be applied in the screening of IPV in high patient volume settings and efficiently implemented in primary health care units which can then refer patients for specialized care. The two questions of the WAST-S provide insight into the intimate relationship measuring the presence of violence, information not easily accessible by the standard clinical interview. This information when provided to clinicians has the potential for assuring more effective prevention and treatment adherence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在莫桑比克国家卫生服务机构验证妇女虐待筛查工具 (WAST-S)(对艾滋病预防和坚持抗逆转录病毒疗法治疗的意义):准实验性交叉研究
亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)包括由与受害者有亲密关系的人或曾经与受害者有亲密关系的人实施的各种虐待行为。在全球范围内,这是一个严重的、可预防的公共健康问题。本文报告了莫桑比克对虐待妇女筛查工具 (WAST-S) 的改编验证情况,并建议应用该工具进行更有效的预防和抗逆转录病毒疗法。该研究采用前瞻性准实验交叉设计的定量方法,将 4 个医疗保健单位的群组按相反顺序分配给两种干预方法。IPV 采用翻译过的、文化适应版 WAST-S 进行测量。该方法与包含 IPV 问题的标准临床访谈进行了比较。WAST-Short 的量表与标准临床访谈之间有很好的一致性:0.235 (95% CI: 0.219 - 0.250)。作为一种 IPV 筛查工具,WAST-Short 比标准临床访谈更为有效。它能提供有关亲密关系的信息,并能测量是否存在暴力行为。而标准临床访谈在获取这些信息方面效果较差。事实证明,WAST-S 是一种比经临床改编的访谈更可靠的工具,可用于在患者数量较多的环境中筛查 IPV,并可在初级卫生保健单位有效实施,然后将患者转诊至专业护理机构。WAST-S 的两个问题可以深入了解亲密关系中是否存在暴力,而这些信息是标准临床访谈无法轻易获取的。这些信息提供给临床医生后,有可能确保更有效的预防和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fertility status of nave human immunodeficiency virus-infected premenopausal females Triggers of sub-optimal HIV viral load suppression amongst vulnerable children on art in parts of Lagos State Nigeria: Experience of USAID supported ICHSSA-2 project Validation of women abuse screening tool (WAST-S) in the Mozambique National Health Service (significance for HIV prevention and ART treatment Adherence): A quasi-experimental crossover study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1