The Influence of Social and Individual Factors on Medicine Use in Older Adults

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management Pub Date : 2023-11-30 DOI:10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2691
Eman Rafhi, I. Stupans, Joon Soo Park, Kate Wang
{"title":"The Influence of Social and Individual Factors on Medicine Use in Older Adults","authors":"Eman Rafhi, I. Stupans, Joon Soo Park, Kate Wang","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To quantitatively explore the social and individual factors (including beliefs, experiences, and health literacy) that may affect medicine use in older adults. Design: A descriptive research approach with quantitative-based methods was used. Individual structured interviews were completed for each participant where they were questioned on any health conditions, medicines, and healthcare utilisation. The following validated questionnaires were implemented in the interview; Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Health Literacy Questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L scale, Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicines Scale, Patients Attitudes Towards Deprescribing, Medication Related Burden Quality of Life, and Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS software. Setting: People ≥65 years living in the community in Australia. Main Outcome Measures: Suboptimal prescribing, including polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medicines use, and adherence. Results: Twenty-four participants completed the study and reported a mean BMQ necessity score of 11/25, mean specific concerns score of 19/25, mean general overuse score of 12/20 and suggest general harm score of 16/20. Most participants believed that medicines do more harm than good and physicians are overprescribing medicines. The highest scoring HLQ domain was ‘Navigating the healthcare system’, while the lowest scoring domains were ‘social support’ and ‘having sufficient information to manage my health’.  Additionally, individual experience was found to be an important factor in participants’ medication attitudes and participants who trusted their prescriber were more likely to adhere to their medication regimen.   Conclusion: The influence of beliefs, experiences, and health literacy on medicine use in older adults remains unclear, and future studies will investigate the effects of these factors on a larger sample size.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i3.2691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively explore the social and individual factors (including beliefs, experiences, and health literacy) that may affect medicine use in older adults. Design: A descriptive research approach with quantitative-based methods was used. Individual structured interviews were completed for each participant where they were questioned on any health conditions, medicines, and healthcare utilisation. The following validated questionnaires were implemented in the interview; Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, Health Literacy Questionnaire, EQ-5D-5L scale, Barthel Activities of Daily Living Index, Perceived Sensitivity to Medicines Scale, Patients Attitudes Towards Deprescribing, Medication Related Burden Quality of Life, and Adherence to Refills and Medication Scale. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS software. Setting: People ≥65 years living in the community in Australia. Main Outcome Measures: Suboptimal prescribing, including polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medicines use, and adherence. Results: Twenty-four participants completed the study and reported a mean BMQ necessity score of 11/25, mean specific concerns score of 19/25, mean general overuse score of 12/20 and suggest general harm score of 16/20. Most participants believed that medicines do more harm than good and physicians are overprescribing medicines. The highest scoring HLQ domain was ‘Navigating the healthcare system’, while the lowest scoring domains were ‘social support’ and ‘having sufficient information to manage my health’.  Additionally, individual experience was found to be an important factor in participants’ medication attitudes and participants who trusted their prescriber were more likely to adhere to their medication regimen.   Conclusion: The influence of beliefs, experiences, and health literacy on medicine use in older adults remains unclear, and future studies will investigate the effects of these factors on a larger sample size.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会和个人因素对老年人用药的影响
目的定量探究可能影响老年人用药的社会和个人因素(包括信念、经验和健康知识)。设计:采用以定量为基础的描述性研究方法。对每位受试者进行个人结构式访谈,询问他们的健康状况、药物和医疗保健使用情况。访谈中使用了以下经过验证的问卷:药品信念问卷、健康素养问卷、EQ-5D-5L 量表、Barthel 日常生活活动指数、对药品的感知敏感度量表、患者对开药的态度、与用药相关的生活质量负担以及坚持补药和用药量表。使用 SPSS 软件计算描述性统计。研究环境居住在澳大利亚社区的≥65岁的人群。主要结果指标:次优处方,包括多药合用、潜在用药不当和依从性。结果:24 名参与者完成了研究,他们报告的 BMQ 必要性平均得分为 11/25,具体问题平均得分为 19/25,一般过度用药平均得分为 12/20,一般危害建议得分为 16/20。大多数参与者认为药品弊大于利,医生开药过多。HLQ 中得分最高的领域是 "医疗保健系统导航",得分最低的领域是 "社会支持 "和 "有足够的信息来管理我的健康"。 此外,个人经验也是影响参与者用药态度的重要因素,信任处方医生的参与者更有可能坚持用药。 结论信念、经验和健康知识对老年人用药的影响仍不明确,未来的研究将在更大的样本量上调查这些因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gap Analysis of Providing Primary Health Care in Comprehensive Rural Health Centers of Iran Leading for Sustainable Health Systems Welcome to the final issue of the College’s Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management for 2023 Australian Health Services Management Courses: A discussion on syllabus Performance of Primary Health Centres, Provider’s Perspective of Wellbeing, and Patient’s Assessment of the Centres Using a New Tool in Bangalore, India: An empirical study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1