Virtually Prioritizing a Community's Needs: What Would Make it Easier for People who are Experiencing Homelessness to Manage Their Diabetes?

S. Tariq, E. Grewal, Nat B, Roland Booth, Thami Ka-Caleni, Matt Larsen, Justin Lawson, Anna Whaley, Christine A Walsh, David John Thomas Campbell
{"title":"Virtually Prioritizing a Community's Needs: What Would Make it Easier for People who are Experiencing Homelessness to Manage Their Diabetes?","authors":"S. Tariq, E. Grewal, Nat B, Roland Booth, Thami Ka-Caleni, Matt Larsen, Justin Lawson, Anna Whaley, Christine A Walsh, David John Thomas Campbell","doi":"10.15273/hpj.v3i4.11597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: During the pandemic, a group of people with lived experience (co-researchers) was convened for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project in Calgary, AB that aimed to explore and address barriers to managing diabetes while experiencing homelessness. The group met bi-weekly using a videoconferencing platform on internet-enabled tablets. Objectives: Our aim is to explain the process we undertook to virtually engage in priority setting to identify a research priority for the CBPR project. Methods: Co-researchers participated in 17 focus group discussions about barriers to managing diabetes while experiencing homelessness, following which they were asked to brainstorm responses to the question, “What would make it easier for people who are experiencing homelessness to manage their diabetes?” In subsequent meetings, the responses were grouped to form categories. From those, the group chose the priority using a modified nominal group process, which involved sequentially ranking, then rating the categories. Ranking involved picking 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th choices, and rating involved distributing 0 to 10 points amongst the categories.  Results: Seven categories were formed: Healthcare; Screening for Diabetes; Housing and Shelter; Access to Medications and Supplies; Healthy Food; Diabetes Awareness; and Diabetes Education. Among these, Diabetes Awareness was given the most votes during the ranking and the most points during the rating exercises. Therefore, this is the topic our research will be focused on. Conclusion: We will conduct research for the purpose of increasing diabetes awareness, among shelter staff specifically, and use forum theatre and a short narrative film to share the findings.","PeriodicalId":302892,"journal":{"name":"Healthy Populations Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthy Populations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15273/hpj.v3i4.11597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the pandemic, a group of people with lived experience (co-researchers) was convened for a community-based participatory research (CBPR) project in Calgary, AB that aimed to explore and address barriers to managing diabetes while experiencing homelessness. The group met bi-weekly using a videoconferencing platform on internet-enabled tablets. Objectives: Our aim is to explain the process we undertook to virtually engage in priority setting to identify a research priority for the CBPR project. Methods: Co-researchers participated in 17 focus group discussions about barriers to managing diabetes while experiencing homelessness, following which they were asked to brainstorm responses to the question, “What would make it easier for people who are experiencing homelessness to manage their diabetes?” In subsequent meetings, the responses were grouped to form categories. From those, the group chose the priority using a modified nominal group process, which involved sequentially ranking, then rating the categories. Ranking involved picking 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th choices, and rating involved distributing 0 to 10 points amongst the categories.  Results: Seven categories were formed: Healthcare; Screening for Diabetes; Housing and Shelter; Access to Medications and Supplies; Healthy Food; Diabetes Awareness; and Diabetes Education. Among these, Diabetes Awareness was given the most votes during the ranking and the most points during the rating exercises. Therefore, this is the topic our research will be focused on. Conclusion: We will conduct research for the purpose of increasing diabetes awareness, among shelter staff specifically, and use forum theatre and a short narrative film to share the findings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟确定社区需求的优先次序:如何让无家可归者更容易控制糖尿病?
简介:大流行病期间,一个由有生活经验的人(共同研究者)组成的小组在加拿大卡尔加里市开展了一个社区参与式研究(CBPR)项目,旨在探索和解决无家可归者在管理糖尿病时遇到的障碍。该小组通过互联网平板电脑上的视频会议平台每两周举行一次会议。目标:我们的目的是解释我们为确定 CBPR 项目的研究重点而进行的虚拟优先级设定过程。方法:共同研究人员参加了 17 次焦点小组讨论,讨论无家可归者在管理糖尿病时遇到的障碍,随后要求他们集思广益,回答 "怎样才能让无家可归者更容易管理糖尿病?"在随后的会议中,这些回答被归类。小组采用修改后的名义小组流程从中选择优先事项,该流程包括按顺序对类别进行排序,然后评分。排序包括选出第一、第二、第三和第四个选择,评分包括在各个类别中分配 0 到 10 分。 结果:形成了七个类别:医疗保健、糖尿病筛查、住房和庇护所、药物和用品的获取、健康食品、糖尿病意识和糖尿病教育。其中,"糖尿病意识 "在排名中得票最多,在评分中得分最高。因此,这是我们研究的重点。结论:我们将以提高庇护所工作人员对糖尿病的认识为目的开展研究,并利用论坛剧场和叙事短片来分享研究成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Crossroads Interdisciplinary Health Research Conference Abstracts 2023 Theoretical Approaches to Disrupting Historical Trauma Among Two-Spirit and Indigenous LGBTQ+ Elders Using the Biopsychosocial Framework to Address the Ongoing Impacts of the Indian Residential School System and Colonization in Canadian Health Care Systems Virtually Prioritizing a Community's Needs: What Would Make it Easier for People who are Experiencing Homelessness to Manage Their Diabetes? Current Trends in Care for Infants Diagnosed with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Canada: A Discussion Paper
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1