Distinguishing the genuine from the fake in South African universities: Scholarly awards, books and academic credibility

IF 1.5 4区 综合性期刊 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES South African Journal of Science Pub Date : 2023-11-29 DOI:10.17159/sajs.2023/16491
Robert Morrell, Neil Roos
{"title":"Distinguishing the genuine from the fake in South African universities: Scholarly awards, books and academic credibility","authors":"Robert Morrell, Neil Roos","doi":"10.17159/sajs.2023/16491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"maintaining universities as places of enquiry, debate and engagement rather than as mass-production factories. We argue that the scholarly book acts as a counterweight to quick and cynical practices. Its production takes time but it is a goal available to all scholars in all disciplines. The scholarly book offers an alternative, we would argue the supreme, form of research validation. In this short piece we reflect on the production of one sort of scholarly output, the book. We ask specifically what the ethnographic life of the book tells us about how seriously a university takes questions of academic credibility and the robustness of an academic culture at a university. We also consider how individual academics approach the question of producing this most time-and energy-consuming of academic outputs in the light of the incentives offered for quicker easier forms of output. Moreover, we ask whether the emergence of a book from a university, the","PeriodicalId":21928,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Science","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/16491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

maintaining universities as places of enquiry, debate and engagement rather than as mass-production factories. We argue that the scholarly book acts as a counterweight to quick and cynical practices. Its production takes time but it is a goal available to all scholars in all disciplines. The scholarly book offers an alternative, we would argue the supreme, form of research validation. In this short piece we reflect on the production of one sort of scholarly output, the book. We ask specifically what the ethnographic life of the book tells us about how seriously a university takes questions of academic credibility and the robustness of an academic culture at a university. We also consider how individual academics approach the question of producing this most time-and energy-consuming of academic outputs in the light of the incentives offered for quicker easier forms of output. Moreover, we ask whether the emergence of a book from a university, the
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
辨别南非大学的真伪:学术奖项、书籍和学术信誉
保持大学作为探究、辩论和参与的场所,而不是批量生产的工厂。我们认为,学术著作是对急功近利做法的一种制衡。学术著作的出版需要时间,但它是所有学科的所有学者都可以实现的目标。学术著作提供了另一种研究验证形式,我们认为它是研究验证的最高形式。在这篇短文中,我们将反思一种学术成果--书籍--的生产。我们特别要问的是,图书的人种学生活告诉我们,一所大学是如何认真对待学术可信度和大学学术文化的稳健性问题的。此外,我们还考虑了学者个人是如何在更快捷、更轻松的学术成果形式的激励下,处理撰写这种最耗时耗力的学术成果的问题的。此外,我们还提出了一个问题:大学出书,是否会影响学术文化?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Science
South African Journal of Science 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The South African Journal of Science is a multidisciplinary journal published bimonthly by the Academy of Science of South Africa. Our mandate is to publish original research with an interdisciplinary or regional focus, which will interest readers from more than one discipline, and to provide a forum for discussion of news and developments in research and higher education. Authors are requested to write their papers and reports in a manner and style that is intelligible to specialists and non-specialists alike. Research contributions, which are peer reviewed, are of three kinds: Review Articles, Research Articles and Research Letters.
期刊最新文献
Response to Brand et al. (2022) ‘Data sharing governance in sub-Saharan Africa during public health emergencies’ Reconsidering consent for biomedical research using human biological material and associated data Shedding light on the vexed question of science and uncertainty The next steps in human evolutionary palaeoecology The pros and cons of buccal swabbing and tail clipping for monitoring reptilian biodiversity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1