Development of an international prehospital CPR-induced consciousness guideline: A Delphi study

Jack Howard, Eystein Grusd, Don Rice, Nikiah G. Nudell, Carlos Lipscombe, Matthew Shepherd, Alexander Olaussen
{"title":"Development of an international prehospital CPR-induced consciousness guideline: A Delphi study","authors":"Jack Howard, Eystein Grusd, Don Rice, Nikiah G. Nudell, Carlos Lipscombe, Matthew Shepherd, Alexander Olaussen","doi":"10.1177/27536386231215608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improved prehospital systems are contributing to increased presentations of CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). Data registries do not report CPRIC presentations and thus continued lack of evidence exists, causing a significant variation of prehospital CPRIC management guidelines. The result is variation in recognizing and managing CPRIC. Steps are needed to improve knowledge of CPRIC and model evidence-based guidelines. An international panel of experts was recruited to create CPRIC definitions, guidelines, and a reporting framework which can be used for reporting purposes. A Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement rate, on three domains or areas of interest: Definition, management guideline and data reporting. Participants were invited from the author's professional organizations, as well as social media outlets to recruit as many international clinicians as possible. The study administered four rounds of online surveys. Each round had multiple consensus statements for participants to respond to. Eighty-two percent of panelists reported seeing or managing CPRIC suggesting either improved awareness or increased exposure. Consensus was achieved in all three domains. There was agreement on a clear definition of CPRIC. The panel developed two subgroups of CPRIC; interfering and non-interfering CPRIC. Ketamine was the preferred choice to treat CPRIC. Panelists overwhelmingly felt CPRIC needed to be included into the Utstein guidelines. This study successfully created definitions of CPRIC, management guidelines, and a data reporting framework. Using this study as a building block, the study team hopes stronger, evidence-based guidelines can now be researched and published.","PeriodicalId":509430,"journal":{"name":"Paramedicine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536386231215608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved prehospital systems are contributing to increased presentations of CPR-Induced Consciousness (CPRIC). Data registries do not report CPRIC presentations and thus continued lack of evidence exists, causing a significant variation of prehospital CPRIC management guidelines. The result is variation in recognizing and managing CPRIC. Steps are needed to improve knowledge of CPRIC and model evidence-based guidelines. An international panel of experts was recruited to create CPRIC definitions, guidelines, and a reporting framework which can be used for reporting purposes. A Delphi methodology was used to gain consensus, defined as ≥70% agreement rate, on three domains or areas of interest: Definition, management guideline and data reporting. Participants were invited from the author's professional organizations, as well as social media outlets to recruit as many international clinicians as possible. The study administered four rounds of online surveys. Each round had multiple consensus statements for participants to respond to. Eighty-two percent of panelists reported seeing or managing CPRIC suggesting either improved awareness or increased exposure. Consensus was achieved in all three domains. There was agreement on a clear definition of CPRIC. The panel developed two subgroups of CPRIC; interfering and non-interfering CPRIC. Ketamine was the preferred choice to treat CPRIC. Panelists overwhelmingly felt CPRIC needed to be included into the Utstein guidelines. This study successfully created definitions of CPRIC, management guidelines, and a data reporting framework. Using this study as a building block, the study team hopes stronger, evidence-based guidelines can now be researched and published.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定国际院前心肺复苏诱发意识指南:德尔菲研究
院前系统的改进导致心肺复苏术诱发意识障碍(CPRIC)的病例增加。数据登记处并不报告 CPRIC 现象,因此仍然缺乏证据,导致院前 CPRIC 管理指南存在很大差异。因此,在识别和管理 CPRIC 方面存在差异。我们需要采取措施来提高对 CPRIC 的认识并制定循证指南。我们招募了一个国际专家小组来制定 CPRIC 定义、指南和可用于报告目的的报告框架。采用德尔菲法就三个领域或相关方面达成共识,即一致率≥70%:定义、管理指南和数据报告。参与者来自作者所在的专业组织以及社交媒体,以招募尽可能多的国际临床医生。研究共进行了四轮在线调查。每轮调查都有多个共识声明供参与者回答。82%的专家组成员表示看到过或管理过 CPRIC,这表明人们对 CPRIC 的认识有所提高或接触有所增加。在所有三个领域都达成了共识。与会者就 CPRIC 的明确定义达成了一致。专家小组制定了 CPRIC 的两个分组:干扰性 CPRIC 和非干扰性 CPRIC。氯胺酮是治疗 CPRIC 的首选药物。绝大多数小组成员认为,需要将 CPRIC 纳入乌特斯坦指南。这项研究成功创建了 CPRIC 的定义、管理指南和数据报告框架。以这项研究为基础,研究小组希望现在可以研究并发布更有力的循证指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of out-of-hospital research in Ireland from 2000 to 2022 Paramedic educational interventions for out-of-hospital domestic and intimate partner violence cases: A scoping review Influence of patient sex on pain management practices in Paramedicine: A rapid review A qualitative study on the relationship between leadership and clinical skills in paramedicine and the promotion of patient safety Leveraging collaboration to enhance quality in paramedicine research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1