Evaluating programme-wide course redevelopment within a learning management system

Cameron Hooson-Smith, Kieran Williamson
{"title":"Evaluating programme-wide course redevelopment within a learning management system","authors":"Cameron Hooson-Smith, Kieran Williamson","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2023.606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Effective course design within the architecture of a learning management system (LMS) is crucial for achieving high-quality learning outcomes in blended and online courses (Bollinger & Martin, 2021; Spiceland et al., 2015; Vaughan, 2010). Implementing a consistent visual design template across multiple courses can promote student engagement and achievement of learning objectives (Ralston-Berg & Braatz, 2021). Other elements of effective course design include clear instructions, structured learning activities, and effective mechanisms for interaction and feedback (Baldwin et al., 2018; Martin et al., 2021).   Method: A comprehensive redesign was conducted of the LMS component of 34 undergraduate course instances (20 blended on-campus courses; 14 online distance courses) across three programmes in the science and health faculties at a New Zealand university. The redesigned template aimed to improve the clarity and ease of navigation to important course information, structure student learning tasks, and provide a foundation for effective course delivery. The initial phase involved creating and testing the template. This was subsequently presented to faculty as a means to cultivate commitment and collaboration among academics, academic support teams, and administrative staff. The template was designed to minimise cognitive load to promote comprehension and retention (Schnotz & Kürschner, 2007). It incorporated evidence-based course components based on principles of effective course design, including detailed and comprehensive information on the course and assessments; weekly modules with clearly stated learning outcomes, task lists, lecture slides and recording links, required readings, tutorial and lab materials; assessment requirements; supplementary materials; and links to available course support (Bollinger & Martin, 2021). While maintaining a standardised visual design, the template was flexible to accommodate the specific needs of individual courses.   Results and Discussion: An evaluation of the impact of the redesign project will be conducted. Data sources will include student surveys administered midway through and at the end of each course, as well as coded feedback from academic and support staff. The effect of the redesign on key student and instructor outcomes will be analysed. Based on research on effective blended and online course design, we expect our evaluation will uncover systematic benefits to student experience as measured by perceptions of course organisation and engagement of course material. For instructors, we anticipate that the standardised template will reduce time on administrative activities such as answering student emails, allowing them to focus on higher-value tasks.   Conclusion: This study aims to provide valuable insights into effective practises for course design that promote student engagement and the achievement of intended learning outcomes. The project aligns with Ascilite 2023 subthemes. The focus on effective course design relates to subtheme 3 on digital pedagogy. Designing an effective online component of blended courses represents a key challenge for educators in a digital world. Additionally, the collaborations between academics, administrators, and support staff reflect subtheme 2 on building deeper partnerships within an institution. By evaluating a programme focused on enhancing blended learning through partnership and pedagogical research, this study will offer critical perspectives on key issues in teaching and learning in a digital world.","PeriodicalId":236417,"journal":{"name":"ASCILITE Publications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCILITE Publications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/apubs.2023.606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Effective course design within the architecture of a learning management system (LMS) is crucial for achieving high-quality learning outcomes in blended and online courses (Bollinger & Martin, 2021; Spiceland et al., 2015; Vaughan, 2010). Implementing a consistent visual design template across multiple courses can promote student engagement and achievement of learning objectives (Ralston-Berg & Braatz, 2021). Other elements of effective course design include clear instructions, structured learning activities, and effective mechanisms for interaction and feedback (Baldwin et al., 2018; Martin et al., 2021).   Method: A comprehensive redesign was conducted of the LMS component of 34 undergraduate course instances (20 blended on-campus courses; 14 online distance courses) across three programmes in the science and health faculties at a New Zealand university. The redesigned template aimed to improve the clarity and ease of navigation to important course information, structure student learning tasks, and provide a foundation for effective course delivery. The initial phase involved creating and testing the template. This was subsequently presented to faculty as a means to cultivate commitment and collaboration among academics, academic support teams, and administrative staff. The template was designed to minimise cognitive load to promote comprehension and retention (Schnotz & Kürschner, 2007). It incorporated evidence-based course components based on principles of effective course design, including detailed and comprehensive information on the course and assessments; weekly modules with clearly stated learning outcomes, task lists, lecture slides and recording links, required readings, tutorial and lab materials; assessment requirements; supplementary materials; and links to available course support (Bollinger & Martin, 2021). While maintaining a standardised visual design, the template was flexible to accommodate the specific needs of individual courses.   Results and Discussion: An evaluation of the impact of the redesign project will be conducted. Data sources will include student surveys administered midway through and at the end of each course, as well as coded feedback from academic and support staff. The effect of the redesign on key student and instructor outcomes will be analysed. Based on research on effective blended and online course design, we expect our evaluation will uncover systematic benefits to student experience as measured by perceptions of course organisation and engagement of course material. For instructors, we anticipate that the standardised template will reduce time on administrative activities such as answering student emails, allowing them to focus on higher-value tasks.   Conclusion: This study aims to provide valuable insights into effective practises for course design that promote student engagement and the achievement of intended learning outcomes. The project aligns with Ascilite 2023 subthemes. The focus on effective course design relates to subtheme 3 on digital pedagogy. Designing an effective online component of blended courses represents a key challenge for educators in a digital world. Additionally, the collaborations between academics, administrators, and support staff reflect subtheme 2 on building deeper partnerships within an institution. By evaluating a programme focused on enhancing blended learning through partnership and pedagogical research, this study will offer critical perspectives on key issues in teaching and learning in a digital world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在学习管理系统内评估整个计划的课程再开发工作
简介:在学习管理系统(LMS)架构内进行有效的课程设计,是混合式和在线课程取得高质量学习成果的关键(Bollinger & Martin, 2021; Spiceland et al:在学习管理系统(LMS)架构内进行有效的课程设计,对于在混合式和在线课程中实现高质量的学习成果至关重要(Bollinger & Martin, 2021; Spiceland et al.)在多门课程中采用一致的视觉设计模板可以促进学生的参与和学习目标的实现(Ralston-Berg & Braatz, 2021)。有效课程设计的其他要素还包括清晰的指导、结构化的学习活动以及有效的互动和反馈机制(Baldwin 等人,2018;Martin 等人,2021)。 方法:对新西兰一所大学科学与健康学院三个专业的 34 门本科课程实例(20 门校内混合课程;14 门在线远程课程)的 LMS 部分进行了全面的重新设计。重新设计的模板旨在提高重要课程信息的清晰度和导航的便捷性,构建学生学习任务的结构,并为有效的课程交付奠定基础。初始阶段包括创建和测试模板。随后,该模板被提交给教职员工,以此来培养学术人员、学术支持团队和行政人员之间的承诺与合作。该模板旨在最大限度地减少认知负荷,以促进理解和保持(Schnotz & Kürschner, 2007)。它纳入了基于有效课程设计原则的循证课程组成部分,包括详细而全面的课程和评估信息;每周模块,其中包含明确的学习成果、任务清单、讲义幻灯片和录音链接、必读书目、辅导和实验材料;评估要求;补充材料;以及可用课程支持链接(Bollinger & Martin, 2021)。在保持标准化视觉设计的同时,该模板还具有灵活性,可满足个别课程的特定需求。 结果与讨论:将对重新设计项目的影响进行评估。数据来源将包括在每门课程的中途和结束时进行的学生调查,以及来自学术和辅助人员的编码反馈。将分析重新设计对学生和教师主要成果的影响。根据对有效的混合式和在线课程设计的研究,我们预计我们的评估将从学生对课程组织的看法和对课程材料的参与度方面发现学生体验的系统性优势。对于教师而言,我们预计标准化模板将减少回复学生电子邮件等行政活动的时间,使他们能够专注于价值更高的任务。 结论本研究旨在为课程设计的有效实践提供有价值的见解,以促进学生的参与并实现预期的学习成果。该项目符合 Ascilite 2023 的次主题。对有效课程设计的关注与关于数字教学法的次主题 3 有关。在数字世界中,设计混合课程中有效的在线部分是教育工作者面临的一项关键挑战。此外,学者、行政人员和辅助人员之间的合作也反映了关于在机构内建立更深层次伙伴关系的次主题 2。本研究通过评估一项侧重于通过伙伴关系和教学研究来加强混合式学习的计划,将为数字世界中的教与学的关键问题提供重要的视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Governance of artificial intelligence and data in Australasian higher education: A snapshot of policy and practice Learning design principles that cultivate future-oriented students It’s the vibe – Course environment and the intersection of environmental psychology and learner experience design Adapting assessment for/despite generative artificial intelligence Learning analytics with iLearn Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1