Retorika Aleksandrui: tekstas ir intertekstai

Alius Jaskelevičius
{"title":"Retorika Aleksandrui: tekstas ir intertekstai","authors":"Alius Jaskelevičius","doi":"10.15388/litera.2023.65.3.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a long time, Aristotle was considered the author of the “Rhetoric to Alexander”. However, in the 16th century, Anaximenes of Lampsacus came to be considered its author. Despite some links between the teachings of the “Rhetoric to Alexander” and those of Anaximenes, the question of authorship remains unresolved.Based on the text of the “Rhetoric to Alexander” that has come down to us, and in conjunction with other intertexts, attempts have been made to determine the extent to which the “Rhetoric to Alexander” may have been influenced by different authors and texts. This paper raises doubts about whether attributing the “Rhetoric to Alexander” to Anaximenes closes the debate on the authorship of this work.","PeriodicalId":432201,"journal":{"name":"Literatūra","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatūra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/litera.2023.65.3.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For a long time, Aristotle was considered the author of the “Rhetoric to Alexander”. However, in the 16th century, Anaximenes of Lampsacus came to be considered its author. Despite some links between the teachings of the “Rhetoric to Alexander” and those of Anaximenes, the question of authorship remains unresolved.Based on the text of the “Rhetoric to Alexander” that has come down to us, and in conjunction with other intertexts, attempts have been made to determine the extent to which the “Rhetoric to Alexander” may have been influenced by different authors and texts. This paper raises doubts about whether attributing the “Rhetoric to Alexander” to Anaximenes closes the debate on the authorship of this work.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿列克桑德鲁修辞学:技术与跨学科
长期以来,亚里士多德被认为是《亚历山大辞典》的作者。然而,在 16 世纪,兰普萨克斯的阿那克西美尼斯被认为是该书的作者。尽管《亚历山大辞典》的教义与阿那克西美尼斯的教义有一些联系,但作者问题仍未解决。根据流传下来的《亚历山大辞典》文本,并结合其他互文,我们试图确定《亚历山大辞典》在多大程度上可能受到了不同作者和文本的影响。本文对将《亚历山大辞典》归于阿那克西美尼斯是否就结束了关于这部作品作者的争论提出了疑问。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uždaros visuomenės fenomenologija Antano Vienuolio „Paskenduolėje“: antropologiniai profiliai Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos Trumpoji draminė forma Kosto Ostrausko ir Juozo Erlicko kūryboje Žemininkai Vilniuje: santykis su daugiataučio miesto erdve „Peržengti kaustančias ribas...“: keli Vandos Zaborskaitės biografijos papildymai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1