The economic limits of empathy? Analysing variation in the attitudes of oppressed minority groups towards refugees

IF 2.8 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-26 DOI:10.1080/1369183X.2022.2085081
Oguzhan Turkoglu, Miceal Canavan, A. Içduygu
{"title":"The economic limits of empathy? Analysing variation in the attitudes of oppressed minority groups towards refugees","authors":"Oguzhan Turkoglu, Miceal Canavan, A. Içduygu","doi":"10.1080/1369183X.2022.2085081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT How do group characteristics differentially moderate attitudes towards refugees on humanitarian, sociocultural, and economic issues? Building on recent research on group empathy and perspective-taking, we argue that oppressed minority groups will display more positive attitudes towards refugees than dominant majority groups due to empathy triggered by a shared experience of oppression. However, there are economic limits of empathy. Specifically, the empathetic response will not extend to attitudes regarding the economic impact of refugees due to the perceived zero-sum nature of economic competition. Analysis of granular data in Turkey supports the argument, with Kurds (i.e. oppressed group) displaying more positive attitudes on sociocultural and humanitarian issues but not economic. The generalisability of this argument is underscored by a similar analysis of European Social Survey data from 37 countries. The results highlight the importance of group characteristics in understanding attitudes towards refugees, particularly how views vary across groups and topics.","PeriodicalId":48371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","volume":"27 1","pages":"4850 - 4869"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2085081","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT How do group characteristics differentially moderate attitudes towards refugees on humanitarian, sociocultural, and economic issues? Building on recent research on group empathy and perspective-taking, we argue that oppressed minority groups will display more positive attitudes towards refugees than dominant majority groups due to empathy triggered by a shared experience of oppression. However, there are economic limits of empathy. Specifically, the empathetic response will not extend to attitudes regarding the economic impact of refugees due to the perceived zero-sum nature of economic competition. Analysis of granular data in Turkey supports the argument, with Kurds (i.e. oppressed group) displaying more positive attitudes on sociocultural and humanitarian issues but not economic. The generalisability of this argument is underscored by a similar analysis of European Social Survey data from 37 countries. The results highlight the importance of group characteristics in understanding attitudes towards refugees, particularly how views vary across groups and topics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
同理心的经济局限?分析受压迫少数群体对难民态度的差异
ABSTRACT 群体特征如何在人道主义、社会文化和经济问题上不同程度地缓和对难民的态度?基于最近对群体移情和观点采纳的研究,我们认为,受压迫的少数群体会比占主导地位的多数群体对难民表现出更积极的态度,这是因为共同的受压迫经历引发了移情。然而,移情也有经济上的局限性。具体来说,由于经济竞争的零和性质,移情反应不会延伸到对难民经济影响的态度上。对土耳其细粒度数据的分析支持了这一论点,库尔德人(即受压迫群体)在社会文化和人道主义问题上表现出更积极的态度,但在经济问题上则不然。对 37 个国家的欧洲社会调查数据进行的类似分析也强调了这一论点的普遍性。分析结果凸显了群体特征在理解对难民的态度方面的重要性,特别是不同群体和不同主题之间的观点差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
157
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (JEMS) publishes the results of first-class research on all forms of migration and its consequences, together with articles on ethnic conflict, discrimination, racism, nationalism, citizenship and policies of integration. Contributions to the journal, which are all fully refereed, are especially welcome when they are the result of original empirical research that makes a clear contribution to the field of migration JEMS has a long-standing interest in informed policy debate and contributions are welcomed which seek to develop the implications of research for policy innovation, or which evaluate the results of previous initiatives. The journal is also interested in publishing the results of theoretical work.
期刊最新文献
Same, same but different? A Discourse Network Analysis of the EU's framings of refugee arrivals in 2015 and 2022. 'As if the soul returns to the body': affect, stuckedness, and (in)voluntary return to Nicaragua from Spain. Making (in)formality work in a multi-scalar European border regime. Playing dirty: the shady governance and reproduction of migrant illegality. Noninvasive Biomarkers for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease-A Proteomic Related Preliminary Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1