{"title":"Experimental Investigation of Energy-Saving Potential of Ground Source Heat Pump during Peak Hour Operations","authors":"Shammy Kumar, Krishnan Murugesan, Elangovan Rajasekar","doi":"10.1115/1.4064138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems have emerged as energy-efficient alternate systems for conventional the Air-Source Air-Conditioning (ASAC) systems for space heating and cooling applications. GSHPs have gained widespread popularity globally and are extensively utilized in residential and commercial buildings. However, in countries like India where both space cooling and heating are required, it becomes essential to evaluate the performance of GSHP system, especially during peak hour operation to estimate peak load energy demand. This research paper tries to identify the energy efficiency of GSHP system during peak-hour operations in comparison to ASAC system using experimental techniques. Experimental trials were conducted in a laboratory equipped with a single unit of 17.58 kW cooling/heating capacity GSHP system and a 17.57 kW cooling/heating ASAC system (two units of 7.023 kW and 10.548 kW). Experimental trials were conducted in peak summer in the month of June for cooling mode operation and January for heating mode operation for Roorkee weather conditions in northern part of India. The performance of both the systems was compared by defining instantaneous COP and cyclic COP. The instantaneous COP was found to be higher for both the systems during peak hour cooling and heating mode operations. Energy-saving analysis indicates that the ground source heat pump system saves 36.85% and 38.65% of electrical energy in cooling and heating modes, respectively, compared to the ASAC system.","PeriodicalId":17404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ground source heat pump (GSHP) systems have emerged as energy-efficient alternate systems for conventional the Air-Source Air-Conditioning (ASAC) systems for space heating and cooling applications. GSHPs have gained widespread popularity globally and are extensively utilized in residential and commercial buildings. However, in countries like India where both space cooling and heating are required, it becomes essential to evaluate the performance of GSHP system, especially during peak hour operation to estimate peak load energy demand. This research paper tries to identify the energy efficiency of GSHP system during peak-hour operations in comparison to ASAC system using experimental techniques. Experimental trials were conducted in a laboratory equipped with a single unit of 17.58 kW cooling/heating capacity GSHP system and a 17.57 kW cooling/heating ASAC system (two units of 7.023 kW and 10.548 kW). Experimental trials were conducted in peak summer in the month of June for cooling mode operation and January for heating mode operation for Roorkee weather conditions in northern part of India. The performance of both the systems was compared by defining instantaneous COP and cyclic COP. The instantaneous COP was found to be higher for both the systems during peak hour cooling and heating mode operations. Energy-saving analysis indicates that the ground source heat pump system saves 36.85% and 38.65% of electrical energy in cooling and heating modes, respectively, compared to the ASAC system.
期刊介绍:
Applications in: Aerospace systems; Gas turbines; Biotechnology; Defense systems; Electronic and photonic equipment; Energy systems; Manufacturing; Refrigeration and air conditioning; Homeland security systems; Micro- and nanoscale devices; Petrochemical processing; Medical systems; Energy efficiency; Sustainability; Solar systems; Combustion systems