Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of latex agglutination test and E-test for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Nupur Gupta, M. Jais, Aditi Sharma, P. Shrivastava
{"title":"Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of latex agglutination test and E-test for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus","authors":"Nupur Gupta, M. Jais, Aditi Sharma, P. Shrivastava","doi":"10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20233559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study was undertaken to compare the phenotypic methods of latex agglutination test and e-test with polymerase chain reaction for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: Two hundred pus samples obtained from different clinical disciplines were subjected to the latex agglutination test and minimum inhibitory concentration by e-test (Oxacillin and Vancomycin) as per the standard guidelines. The comparison was made with polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. The diagnostic accuracy of each method was reported in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.   Results: The sensitivity of latex agglutination test was found to be 100% whereas e-test for Oxacillin was found to be 96.67% sensitive. Higher specificity for e-test was reported (99.41%) when compared to the latex agglutination test (97.65%). Conclusions: Latex agglutination and e-tests are tests are relatively simpler, rapid, and easy-to-perform methods when compared to polymerase chain reaction. The present study reported high sensitivity and specificity values for both the tests, and therefore supports usage of the stated methods as screening tools for methicillin-resistant S. aureus. However, more multi-centric studies are recommended to precisely determine the diagnostic accuracy of these phenotypic methods.","PeriodicalId":14297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.intjscirep20233559","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study was undertaken to compare the phenotypic methods of latex agglutination test and e-test with polymerase chain reaction for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: Two hundred pus samples obtained from different clinical disciplines were subjected to the latex agglutination test and minimum inhibitory concentration by e-test (Oxacillin and Vancomycin) as per the standard guidelines. The comparison was made with polymerase chain reaction as the reference test. The diagnostic accuracy of each method was reported in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.   Results: The sensitivity of latex agglutination test was found to be 100% whereas e-test for Oxacillin was found to be 96.67% sensitive. Higher specificity for e-test was reported (99.41%) when compared to the latex agglutination test (97.65%). Conclusions: Latex agglutination and e-tests are tests are relatively simpler, rapid, and easy-to-perform methods when compared to polymerase chain reaction. The present study reported high sensitivity and specificity values for both the tests, and therefore supports usage of the stated methods as screening tools for methicillin-resistant S. aureus. However, more multi-centric studies are recommended to precisely determine the diagnostic accuracy of these phenotypic methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估乳胶凝集试验和 E 试验检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的诊断准确性
背景:本研究旨在比较乳胶凝集试验和电子检测法与聚合酶链反应检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的表型方法。检测方法按照标准指南,对从不同临床学科获得的 200 份脓液样本进行乳胶凝集试验,并通过电子测试(氧西林和万古霉素)检测最低抑菌浓度。以聚合酶链反应作为参照检验进行比较。报告了每种方法的诊断准确性,包括敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。 结果乳胶凝集试验的灵敏度为 100%,而奥沙西林电子检测的灵敏度为 96.67%。与乳胶凝集试验(97.65%)相比,电子测试的特异性更高(99.41%)。结论与聚合酶链反应相比,乳胶凝集试验和电子测试是相对简单、快速和易于操作的方法。本研究报告了这两种检测方法的高灵敏度和高特异性,因此支持使用上述方法作为耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的筛查工具。不过,建议进行更多的多中心研究,以准确确定这些表型方法的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transforming weight measurement: a cutting-edge IoT-enabled smart weight machine for centralized price control of products A closer observation of the dedicated responsibilities of nurses at public hospitals in Bangladesh Navigating a paradigm shift; food and drug administration approved Tarlatamab-dlle redefining the landscape of small cell lung cancer therapy Orthodontic treatment modalities of intrusion: a review A clinical research site pharmacy for the division of AIDS sponsored clinical trials in a low middle income country
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1