Taking the measure of net promoter score: An assessment of construct and predictive validity

Susana Jaramillo, George D. Deitz, John D. Hansen, E. Babakus
{"title":"Taking the measure of net promoter score: An assessment of construct and predictive validity","authors":"Susana Jaramillo, George D. Deitz, John D. Hansen, E. Babakus","doi":"10.1177/14707853231213274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the lay appeal of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) is undeniable, scholars have noted concerns over its use based on conceptual and empirical grounds. We address these concerns through an examination of three research questions: (1) To what extent do NPS responses correspond to actual word-of-mouth behaviors? (2) Do NPS responses exhibit measurement invariance across key demographic groupings? (3) How well does NPS perform (as opposed to customer satisfaction scores) as a predictor of financial performance? Study results show that NPS scores correspond to reported word-of-mouth exposure for most, but not all, product categories; NPS responses are invariant across demographic groupings; and that when examined separately, both customer satisfaction and NPS are significant predictors of differences in financial performance, but customer satisfaction explains slightly more variance. We discuss the managerial and theoretical implications arising from these results.","PeriodicalId":506657,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Market Research","volume":"32 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231213274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the lay appeal of the Net Promoter Score (NPS) is undeniable, scholars have noted concerns over its use based on conceptual and empirical grounds. We address these concerns through an examination of three research questions: (1) To what extent do NPS responses correspond to actual word-of-mouth behaviors? (2) Do NPS responses exhibit measurement invariance across key demographic groupings? (3) How well does NPS perform (as opposed to customer satisfaction scores) as a predictor of financial performance? Study results show that NPS scores correspond to reported word-of-mouth exposure for most, but not all, product categories; NPS responses are invariant across demographic groupings; and that when examined separately, both customer satisfaction and NPS are significant predictors of differences in financial performance, but customer satisfaction explains slightly more variance. We discuss the managerial and theoretical implications arising from these results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量净促进者得分:对构建和预测有效性的评估
尽管净推荐值(NPS)对普通人的吸引力毋庸置疑,但学者们也注意到了基于概念和经验原因对其使用的担忧。我们通过研究以下三个研究问题来解决这些问题:(1) NPS 的反应在多大程度上符合实际的口碑行为?(2) NPS 的反应在不同的主要人口群体中是否表现出测量不变性?(3) 作为财务业绩的预测指标,NPS(相对于客户满意度分数)的表现如何?研究结果表明,NPS 分数与大多数产品类别(而非所有产品类别)的报告口碑曝光率相对应;NPS 反应在不同的人口统计分组中是不变的;如果单独研究,客户满意度和 NPS 都是财务绩效差异的重要预测因素,但客户满意度对差异的解释略多一些。我们将讨论这些结果对管理和理论的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The power of specific emotion analysis in predicting donations: A comparative empirical study between sentiment and specific emotion analysis in social media Upselling through upgrading: The role of employee engagement Three little words: A pragmatic qualitative method to understand modern markets Handling the Inconsistency between Self-Report and the Actual Behavior: Validity of Excluding Survey Participants with Insufficient Effort Responding Taking the measure of net promoter score: An assessment of construct and predictive validity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1