Through the Lens of the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcomes Model: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Interprofessional Collaboration in Higher Education

Deborah Witt Sherman, Lisa Cain, Amy Paul-Ward, Ken Winters
{"title":"Through the Lens of the Donabedian Structure-Process-Outcomes Model: Lessons Learned and Recommendations for Interprofessional Collaboration in Higher Education","authors":"Deborah Witt Sherman, Lisa Cain, Amy Paul-Ward, Ken Winters","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v12n6p89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through interprofessional collaboration (IPC), scholars with diverse knowledge and skills enhance the integration and communication of ideas and services in the pursuit of high-quality education. This article explores the structure, process, and outcomes of IPC and proposes recommendations to create a culture of interprofessional collaboration in higher education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants with extensive IPC experience in a research-intensive university. Results regarding IPC were organized around structure-related factors, including physical structure, organizational characteristics, external and internal factors, and group structure, as well as process-related factors, which include intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional facilitators and barriers. Outcomes included intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional, including drawbacks and benefits. Structure-process-outcomes of IPC inform recommendations to strategically create a culture of IPC in higher education. Transformative culture change begins with the identification of champions of IPC, who spearhead the implementation of IPC goals within an organization’s strategic plan. Policies, procedures, and resources of an organization are needed for successful interprofessional collaborations.","PeriodicalId":510213,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Higher Education","volume":"66 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v12n6p89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through interprofessional collaboration (IPC), scholars with diverse knowledge and skills enhance the integration and communication of ideas and services in the pursuit of high-quality education. This article explores the structure, process, and outcomes of IPC and proposes recommendations to create a culture of interprofessional collaboration in higher education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 participants with extensive IPC experience in a research-intensive university. Results regarding IPC were organized around structure-related factors, including physical structure, organizational characteristics, external and internal factors, and group structure, as well as process-related factors, which include intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional facilitators and barriers. Outcomes included intrapersonal, interpersonal, and institutional, including drawbacks and benefits. Structure-process-outcomes of IPC inform recommendations to strategically create a culture of IPC in higher education. Transformative culture change begins with the identification of champions of IPC, who spearhead the implementation of IPC goals within an organization’s strategic plan. Policies, procedures, and resources of an organization are needed for successful interprofessional collaborations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多纳贝迪恩结构-过程-结果模型的视角:高等教育专业间合作的经验教训和建议
通过跨专业合作(IPC),拥有不同知识和技能的学者们在追求高质量教育的过程中加强了思想和服务的整合与交流。本文探讨了 IPC 的结构、过程和结果,并提出了在高等教育中创建跨专业合作文化的建议。我们对一所研究密集型大学中具有丰富 IPC 经验的 17 位参与者进行了半结构式访谈。有关 IPC 的结果围绕与结构相关的因素(包括物理结构、组织特征、外部和内部因素以及团体结构)以及与过程相关的因素(包括人内、人际以及机构的促进因素和障碍)展开。结果包括人内、人际和制度因素,包括弊端和益处。IPC的结构-过程-结果为在高等教育中战略性地创建IPC文化提供了建议。转变文化首先要确定 IPC 的拥护者,由他们在组织的战略计划中带头实施 IPC 目标。成功的跨专业合作需要组织的政策、程序和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Technology in Classrooms in the Colleges of Kathmandu: Challenges and Policy Recommendations Exploring Extra-Curricular Bootcamps: A Qualitative Study on Accelerated Learning in Higher Education Proyecto Slam : The Didactic Side of Slams Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2024 Addressing Gender-Based Violence through the ERA Policy Framework: A Systemic Solution to Dilemmas and Contestations for Institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1