The Use of Absolute Neutrophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis.

Michelle Jane Manding, Expedito Yala
{"title":"The Use of Absolute Neutrophil Count and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as Predictors of Early Onset Neonatal Sepsis.","authors":"Michelle Jane Manding, Expedito Yala","doi":"10.56964/pidspj20232402005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neonatal sepsis contributes to significant morbidity and mortality. Blood culture, the gold standard in its diagnosis, has low sensitivity and is affected by multiple factors. Hence the need for markers derived from routine tests to improve diagnosis deserves further studies. Objectives: This study aims to determine the association and optimal cut-off value and diagnostic performance of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with early-onset neonatal sepsis in term neonates. Methodology: This was a retrospective, analytical, single-center study of admitted patients from January 2016 to December 2021. Clinical factors were analyzed and NLR and ANC were derived from CBC and interpreted using the Manroe chart. Results: Included were 200 neonates with a median birth AOG of 38 weeks. Microorganisms were isolated from nine of 154 neonates with blood culture, corresponding prevalence of 5.84% (95% CI 2.71–10.80). Initial CBC showed elevated mean WBC and 76.5% of neonates were considered to have elevated ANC. Optimal cut-off point of NLR for detecting culture-proven sepsis was 2.86, with a sensitivity of 88.89% (95% CI, 51.75–99.72%) and specificity of 36.55% (95% CI, 28.72–44.95%). The ANC gave the best balance of sensitivity and specificity with an accuracy of 75.50%. Conclusions: The NLR demonstrated good discriminative ability for predicting clinical neonatal sepsis based on ANC. However, individually or simultaneously, these markers demonstrated poor discriminative ability for culture-proven neonatal sepsis in term neonates. ANC and NLR can be used to aid in the diagnosis of clinical neonatal sepsis.","PeriodicalId":117545,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56964/pidspj20232402005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neonatal sepsis contributes to significant morbidity and mortality. Blood culture, the gold standard in its diagnosis, has low sensitivity and is affected by multiple factors. Hence the need for markers derived from routine tests to improve diagnosis deserves further studies. Objectives: This study aims to determine the association and optimal cut-off value and diagnostic performance of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with early-onset neonatal sepsis in term neonates. Methodology: This was a retrospective, analytical, single-center study of admitted patients from January 2016 to December 2021. Clinical factors were analyzed and NLR and ANC were derived from CBC and interpreted using the Manroe chart. Results: Included were 200 neonates with a median birth AOG of 38 weeks. Microorganisms were isolated from nine of 154 neonates with blood culture, corresponding prevalence of 5.84% (95% CI 2.71–10.80). Initial CBC showed elevated mean WBC and 76.5% of neonates were considered to have elevated ANC. Optimal cut-off point of NLR for detecting culture-proven sepsis was 2.86, with a sensitivity of 88.89% (95% CI, 51.75–99.72%) and specificity of 36.55% (95% CI, 28.72–44.95%). The ANC gave the best balance of sensitivity and specificity with an accuracy of 75.50%. Conclusions: The NLR demonstrated good discriminative ability for predicting clinical neonatal sepsis based on ANC. However, individually or simultaneously, these markers demonstrated poor discriminative ability for culture-proven neonatal sepsis in term neonates. ANC and NLR can be used to aid in the diagnosis of clinical neonatal sepsis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用绝对中性粒细胞计数和中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值作为新生儿早期败血症的预测指标。
背景:新生儿败血症会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。血培养是诊断败血症的金标准,但其敏感性较低,且受多种因素影响。因此,需要从常规检测中提取标记物来改进诊断,这值得进一步研究。研究目的本研究旨在确定足月新生儿绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)和中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值(NLR)与早发新生儿败血症的相关性、最佳临界值和诊断性能。研究方法这是一项回顾性、分析性、单中心研究,研究对象为2016年1月至2021年12月收治的患者。研究分析了临床因素,并从全血细胞计数中得出 NLR 和 ANC,使用 Manroe 图表进行解释。研究结果共纳入 200 名新生儿,中位出生 AOG 为 38 周。154 名新生儿中有 9 名经血液培养分离出微生物,相应的感染率为 5.84%(95% CI 2.71-10.80)。最初的全血细胞计数显示平均白细胞升高,76.5%的新生儿被认为ANC升高。检测培养证实的败血症的最佳 NLR 临界点为 2.86,敏感性为 88.89%(95% CI,51.75-99.72%),特异性为 36.55%(95% CI,28.72-44.95%)。ANC在灵敏度和特异性之间取得了最佳平衡,准确率为75.50%。结论:NLRNLR 在根据 ANC 预测临床新生儿败血症方面表现出良好的鉴别能力。然而,无论是单独还是同时使用,这些指标对经培养证实的足月新生儿败血症的鉴别能力都很差。ANC和NLR可用于临床新生儿败血症的辅助诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes Of Acute Cholangitis in Children in a Tertiary Government Hospital in the Philippines: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR cycle threshold value and its association with disease severity and mortality among hospitalized pediatric covid-19 patients. Clinical and Microbiological Profile and Factors Affecting Outcome among Pediatric Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Aye, AI Captain! The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels Using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) Anti-S-RBD Test in Term Neonates Born to COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1