How Training Affects Interviewer Performance Over Time: A Field Experiment with a Large-scale National Representative Survey

Hanyu Sun, Angie Kistler, Ryan Hubbard, Brad Edwards, Marcia Swinson-Vick
{"title":"How Training Affects Interviewer Performance Over Time: A Field Experiment with a Large-scale National Representative Survey","authors":"Hanyu Sun, Angie Kistler, Ryan Hubbard, Brad Edwards, Marcia Swinson-Vick","doi":"10.1177/1525822X231209254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is abundant literature about interviewer effects on the survey process, but studies of interviewer training are quite limited. Previous research has produced mixed findings on how training affects interviewer performance. Trainings are often conducted in person despite the mixed findings. There has been no research that examines the use of videoconferencing as a medium for training field survey interviewers. We conducted an interviewer training experiment with the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We randomly assigned 242 field interviewers into three training modes: in person, videoconference (i.e., WebEx), and self-administered training. Each interviewer’s performance was observed before and after the training. As post-hoc analysis, we observed improvement for higher performed interviewers trained in videoconference. Interviewers trained in videoconference rated their experiences similar to their counterparts trained in person.","PeriodicalId":505739,"journal":{"name":"Field Methods","volume":"47 4","pages":"3 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X231209254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is abundant literature about interviewer effects on the survey process, but studies of interviewer training are quite limited. Previous research has produced mixed findings on how training affects interviewer performance. Trainings are often conducted in person despite the mixed findings. There has been no research that examines the use of videoconferencing as a medium for training field survey interviewers. We conducted an interviewer training experiment with the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). We randomly assigned 242 field interviewers into three training modes: in person, videoconference (i.e., WebEx), and self-administered training. Each interviewer’s performance was observed before and after the training. As post-hoc analysis, we observed improvement for higher performed interviewers trained in videoconference. Interviewers trained in videoconference rated their experiences similar to their counterparts trained in person.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随着时间的推移,培训如何影响采访人员的表现:一项大规模全国代表性调查的实地实验
有关采访人员对调查过程的影响的文献很多,但有关采访人员培训的研究却相当有限。以往的研究对培训如何影响采访人员的表现得出的结论不一。尽管研究结果不一,但培训通常都是亲自进行的。目前还没有研究将视频会议作为培训实地调查访问员的媒介。我们在医疗支出小组调查 (MEPS) 中进行了一次访问员培训实验。我们将 242 名现场采访员随机分配到三种培训模式中:面对面培训、视频会议(即 WebEx)培训和自学培训。我们在培训前后对每位访问员的表现进行了观察。通过事后分析,我们发现在视频会议培训中表现较好的面试官的成绩有所提高。接受过视频会议培训的受访者对其培训经历的评价与接受过面授培训的受访者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Penciling: An Anonymization Method for Social Media Images Automated Name Selection for the Network Scale-up Method The Identification and Documentation of On-site Sensory and Multisensory Experience–A Methodological Protocol Poverty and Wealth without a Ladder? An Appraisal of the Stages of Progress Method among Agro–Pastoralists in Ethiopia’s Lower Omo Valley How Training Affects Interviewer Performance Over Time: A Field Experiment with a Large-scale National Representative Survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1