Impact of Financial Liberalization on Firm Risk

Q2 Decision Sciences Advances in Decision Sciences Pub Date : 2023-11-23 DOI:10.47654/v27y2023i3p14-45
Chong-Chuo Chang, Lin Lin, Yu-Cheng Chang, Kun-Zhan Hsu
{"title":"Impact of Financial Liberalization on Firm Risk","authors":"Chong-Chuo Chang, Lin Lin, Yu-Cheng Chang, Kun-Zhan Hsu","doi":"10.47654/v27y2023i3p14-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigates the impact of financial liberalization on firm risk and examines the relationship between liberalization and firm risk from a global perspective by using three different measures of financial liberalization to analyze the entire sample as well as four different subsamples by using firms from different countries as our samples. Design/methodology/approach: We use the pooled ordinary least squared (OLS) regression model and a series of robustness checks to conduct our analysis by using our sample that includes 63 countries, 18,317 firms, and 161,317 firm-year observations from 1991–2017. Findings: Our empirical analysis concludes that financial liberalization has a significantly negative effect on firm risk. Following a series of robustness checks, we find that the results remain unchanged after categorizing our sample into subsamples according to the level of financial liberalization, controlling for changes in the economic development status, and dividing the sample periods based on the time of the financial crises. Moreover, the quantile regression reveals the asymmetric effect of financial liberalization on firm risk. The findings of our study contribute to a clear perception of how financial liberalization affects firm risk. Originality/value: In this paper, we use the data from multination to know clearly how different countries respond to the financial liberalization policies which may affect the firm risk. Then, we conduct a series of robustness checks to make sure that our result is robust.  According to the result, we can see that the negative significant relationship between financial liberalization and firm risk remains unchanged after categorizing our sample into subsamples according to the level of financial liberalization, controlling for changes in the economic development status, and dividing the sample periods based on the time of the financial crises. Furthermore, the quantile regression reveals the asymmetric effect of financial liberalization on firm risk. We note that our findings are new in the literature. Practical Implication: The findings of our paper give suggestions to multinational corporations regarding the proper management of corporate finance in response to adjustments in financial liberalization policies.","PeriodicalId":38875,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Decision Sciences","volume":"69 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Decision Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47654/v27y2023i3p14-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of financial liberalization on firm risk and examines the relationship between liberalization and firm risk from a global perspective by using three different measures of financial liberalization to analyze the entire sample as well as four different subsamples by using firms from different countries as our samples. Design/methodology/approach: We use the pooled ordinary least squared (OLS) regression model and a series of robustness checks to conduct our analysis by using our sample that includes 63 countries, 18,317 firms, and 161,317 firm-year observations from 1991–2017. Findings: Our empirical analysis concludes that financial liberalization has a significantly negative effect on firm risk. Following a series of robustness checks, we find that the results remain unchanged after categorizing our sample into subsamples according to the level of financial liberalization, controlling for changes in the economic development status, and dividing the sample periods based on the time of the financial crises. Moreover, the quantile regression reveals the asymmetric effect of financial liberalization on firm risk. The findings of our study contribute to a clear perception of how financial liberalization affects firm risk. Originality/value: In this paper, we use the data from multination to know clearly how different countries respond to the financial liberalization policies which may affect the firm risk. Then, we conduct a series of robustness checks to make sure that our result is robust.  According to the result, we can see that the negative significant relationship between financial liberalization and firm risk remains unchanged after categorizing our sample into subsamples according to the level of financial liberalization, controlling for changes in the economic development status, and dividing the sample periods based on the time of the financial crises. Furthermore, the quantile regression reveals the asymmetric effect of financial liberalization on firm risk. We note that our findings are new in the literature. Practical Implication: The findings of our paper give suggestions to multinational corporations regarding the proper management of corporate finance in response to adjustments in financial liberalization policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融自由化对企业风险的影响
目的:本研究调查了金融自由化对企业风险的影响,并从全球视角研究了金融自由化与企业风险之间的关系。研究采用了三种不同的金融自由化衡量标准,以不同国家的企业为样本,对整个样本和四个不同的子样本进行了分析。设计/方法/途径:我们使用集合普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归模型和一系列稳健性检验来进行分析,样本包括 1991-2017 年间的 63 个国家、18,317 家公司和 161,317 个公司年观测值。研究结果我们的实证分析得出结论,金融自由化对企业风险有显著的负面影响。经过一系列稳健性检验,我们发现在根据金融自由化水平将样本划分为子样本、控制经济发展状况的变化以及根据金融危机发生时间划分样本期后,结果保持不变。此外,量化回归揭示了金融自由化对企业风险的非对称影响。我们的研究结果有助于清楚地认识金融自由化如何影响企业风险。原创性/价值:在本文中,我们利用跨国公司的数据,清楚地了解不同国家如何应对可能影响公司风险的金融自由化政策。然后,我们进行了一系列稳健性检验,以确保我们的结果是稳健的。 根据结果,我们可以发现,在根据金融自由化水平将样本划分为子样本、控制经济发展状况的变化以及根据金融危机发生的时间划分样本期之后,金融自由化与企业风险之间的负向显著关系仍然没有改变。此外,量化回归揭示了金融自由化对企业风险的非对称影响。我们注意到,我们的发现在文献中是全新的。实际意义:本文的研究结果为跨国公司在金融自由化政策调整时正确管理公司财务提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Decision Sciences
Advances in Decision Sciences Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evidence from School Principals: Academic Supervision Decision-making on Improving Teacher Performance in Indonesia Impact of Financial Liberalization on Firm Risk A Technical Indicator for a Short-term Trading Decision in the NASDAQ Market Investigating the Influence of Brand Communication and Brand Trust on Customer Commitment: An Examination from the Perspective of Customer Perception Drivers to green human resources management (GHRM) implementation: A Context of Cement Industry in Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1