It's in the Syllabus: The Relationship Between Syllabi Word Use and Teaching Evaluations

IF 2 3区 文学 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Language and Social Psychology Pub Date : 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1177/0261927x231198513
Joanne F. Zinger, Diane J. Lee, Charlie C. Su
{"title":"It's in the Syllabus: The Relationship Between Syllabi Word Use and Teaching Evaluations","authors":"Joanne F. Zinger, Diane J. Lee, Charlie C. Su","doi":"10.1177/0261927x231198513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors analyzed 1,472 course syllabi written by 611 professors to determine whether communion-related and/or agency-related word use in professors’ syllabi predicted those same professors’ end-of-semester teaching evaluations. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC) analyses revealed that professors who used more communal language—including third person plural pronouns (e.g., we), social words (e.g., discussion), and positive emotion words (e.g., please)—received significantly higher teaching evaluations, but agentic language did not significantly predict evaluation scores.","PeriodicalId":47861,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x231198513","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors analyzed 1,472 course syllabi written by 611 professors to determine whether communion-related and/or agency-related word use in professors’ syllabi predicted those same professors’ end-of-semester teaching evaluations. Linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC) analyses revealed that professors who used more communal language—including third person plural pronouns (e.g., we), social words (e.g., discussion), and positive emotion words (e.g., please)—received significantly higher teaching evaluations, but agentic language did not significantly predict evaluation scores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
它就在教学大纲中:教学大纲用词与教学评价之间的关系
作者分析了 611 位教授撰写的 1,472 份课程大纲,以确定教授大纲中与共通相关和/或与代理相关的用词是否能预测这些教授的学期末教学评价。语言调查和字数统计(LIWC)分析表明,使用较多共通语言(包括第三人称复数代词(如我们)、社交词(如讨论)和积极情感词(如请))的教授获得的教学评价明显较高,但代理语言对评价分数的预测作用不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Language and Social Psychology explores the social dimensions of language and the linguistic implications of social life. Articles are drawn from a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, cognitive science, sociology, communication, psychology, education, and anthropology. The journal provides complete and balanced coverage of the latest developments and advances through original, full-length articles, short research notes, and special features as Debates, Courses and Conferences, and Book Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Announcing International Symposium on Intergroup Communication (ISIC3) Presence and Pronouns: An Exploratory Investigation into the Language of Social VR The Grammar of Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review Disconfirming the Role of Nouns as Linguistic Cues of Subsequent Behavior Reminding May Not Be Enough: Overcoming the Male Dominance of the Generic Masculine How Positive and Negative Intergroup Contact May Shape the Communication of Discrimination Toward Migrants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1