Developing English Language Competence through Content and Language Integrated Learning Approaches: Teachers’ Perceptions of the Teaching Practice at the Bilingual Christian University of Congo

Mumbere Malonga Mashauri, John Mumbere Muthambuko
{"title":"Developing English Language Competence through Content and Language Integrated Learning Approaches: Teachers’ Perceptions of the Teaching Practice at the Bilingual Christian University of Congo","authors":"Mumbere Malonga Mashauri, John Mumbere Muthambuko","doi":"10.47941/jep.1518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study gives an authentic sense to the use of CLIL as teachers experience it at UCBC. The central goal of the study is to describe the experience of permanent, visiting, international and ESOL teachers about the use of CLIL techniques in the process of developing UCBC students’ English competences. The study puts much focus on teachers’ perceptions on their professional development experiences on CLIL pedagogy in their teaching career. Methodology: The paradigm in which this study is situated is interpretivist and it used a qualitative study design. In fact, the study employed the descriptive approach to explore the perception of ESOL and content teachers regarding CLIL as a teaching technique at UCBC. Also, the descriptive approach helped in understanding how teachers are applying the CLIL technique and how they are adjusting themselves to the bilingual education practice. Findings: The result of the study showed that (1) teachers did not view themselves as language teachers; they did not know how they could design language objectives in order to incorporate the language items in their English content courses, (2) teachers did not understand how bilingual education pedagogy worked. Many of them did not know academic English and those who did, did not use English to teach their content courses, (3) teachers were prepared for the use of CLIL Pedagogy, but they were reluctant to implement it, (4) UCBC had no accountability policy related to using English to teach content. No one held them accountable for their students’ content learning or language development, (5) teachers did not own the CLIL pedagogy and thought the development of students' English is the work of the English art department alone. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The findings will put all the bilingual education stakeholders before their responsibility in the process of making UCBC a true and excellent bilingual academic institution. The authors recommended that UCBC content teachers be provided with a robust bilingual education training and a robust accountability policy. Also, department chairs should implement different decisions taken out of professional development sessions, and they should implement the bilingual education plan already put in place by the bilingual education coaches. Furthermore, UCBC bilingual education program should have strong and achievable outcomes/goals, and/or objectives for each department, and for each class including first undergraduate through fourth.","PeriodicalId":502894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Practice","volume":"312 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.1518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study gives an authentic sense to the use of CLIL as teachers experience it at UCBC. The central goal of the study is to describe the experience of permanent, visiting, international and ESOL teachers about the use of CLIL techniques in the process of developing UCBC students’ English competences. The study puts much focus on teachers’ perceptions on their professional development experiences on CLIL pedagogy in their teaching career. Methodology: The paradigm in which this study is situated is interpretivist and it used a qualitative study design. In fact, the study employed the descriptive approach to explore the perception of ESOL and content teachers regarding CLIL as a teaching technique at UCBC. Also, the descriptive approach helped in understanding how teachers are applying the CLIL technique and how they are adjusting themselves to the bilingual education practice. Findings: The result of the study showed that (1) teachers did not view themselves as language teachers; they did not know how they could design language objectives in order to incorporate the language items in their English content courses, (2) teachers did not understand how bilingual education pedagogy worked. Many of them did not know academic English and those who did, did not use English to teach their content courses, (3) teachers were prepared for the use of CLIL Pedagogy, but they were reluctant to implement it, (4) UCBC had no accountability policy related to using English to teach content. No one held them accountable for their students’ content learning or language development, (5) teachers did not own the CLIL pedagogy and thought the development of students' English is the work of the English art department alone. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The findings will put all the bilingual education stakeholders before their responsibility in the process of making UCBC a true and excellent bilingual academic institution. The authors recommended that UCBC content teachers be provided with a robust bilingual education training and a robust accountability policy. Also, department chairs should implement different decisions taken out of professional development sessions, and they should implement the bilingual education plan already put in place by the bilingual education coaches. Furthermore, UCBC bilingual education program should have strong and achievable outcomes/goals, and/or objectives for each department, and for each class including first undergraduate through fourth.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过内容与语言相结合的学习方法培养英语语言能力:刚果基督教双语大学教师对教学实践的看法
目的:本研究真实地反映了加拿大中央浸信会大学教师使用 CLIL 的经验。研究的中心目标是描述长期教师、客座教师、国际教师和 ESOL 教师在培养 UCBC 学生英语能力的过程中使用 CLIL 技术的经验。研究的重点是教师对其教学生涯中 CLIL 教学法专业发展经验的看法。 研究方法:本研究的范式是解释学,采用定性研究设计。事实上,本研究采用了描述性的方法,以探讨 UCBC 的 ESOL 教师和教学内容教师对 CLIL 这种教学方法的看法。此外,描述性方法还有助于了解教师是如何应用 CLIL 技术的,以及他们是如何调整自己以适应双语教育实践的。 研究结果研究结果表明:(1) 教师不认为自己是语言教师;他们不知道如何设计语言目标,以便在英语课程中纳入语言项目;(2) 教师不了解双语教育教学法是如何运作的。他们中的许多人不懂学术英语,而懂学术英语的人也不会用英语教授他们的教学内容课程,(3) 教师为使用 CLIL 教学法做好了准备,但他们不愿意实施这种教学法,(4) 加州大学伯克利分校没有与使用英语教授教学内容有关的问责政策。没有人要求他们对学生的内容学习或语言发展负责,(5) 教师并不拥有 CLIL 教学法,他们认为发展学生的英语是英语艺术系的工作。 对理论、政策和实践的独特贡献:研究结果将使所有双语教育的利益相关者认识到他们在使 UCBC 成为真正的、优秀的双语学术机构过程中的责任。作者建议,加州大学伯克利分校应为教学内容教师提供强有力的双语教育培训,并制定强有力的问责政策。同时,系主任应该执行专业发展会议上做出的不同决定,他们应该执行双语教育教练已经制定的双语教育计划。此外,加州大学伯克利分校的双语教育计划应该为每个系、每个班级(包括本科一年级到四年级)制定强有力的、可实现的成果/目标和/或目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring Teachers’ Professional Development Based on Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Case of in-Service Biology Teachers in Tanzania Empowering Educational Leaders: Nurturing Strong Teaching and Learning Environments in Kenyan Schools. Exploring the Psychosocial Challenges Experienced by Teenage Student Mothers in Senior High Schools in Asene Manso Akroso District, Ghana. Effects of Financial Management on Learners’ Performance in Muslim Government Aided Primary Schools in Luwero District, Uganda Intellectual Capital and Performance of Staff at Selected Institutions of Higher Learning in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1