PERMEABILITY COEFFICIENT OF PERVIOUS CEMENT MORTAR MEASURED BY THE CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD METHODS

E. Yogafanny, R. Triatmadja, F. Nurrochmad, Intan Supraba
{"title":"PERMEABILITY COEFFICIENT OF PERVIOUS CEMENT MORTAR MEASURED BY THE CONSTANT HEAD AND FALLING HEAD METHODS","authors":"E. Yogafanny, R. Triatmadja, F. Nurrochmad, Intan Supraba","doi":"10.5937/jaes0-44066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The modified pervious concrete and cement mortar, known as pervious cement mortar (PCM), is designed with a specific composition to create pores. The coarse aggregate is removed to form smaller pore sizes. PCM acts as a water filter, needing higher permeability than cement mortar but less than pervious concrete. Its pores drain water while trapping impurities. This study compares the effects of sand-to-cement ratio (S/C), specimen thickness, and age on permeability and porosity. It also contrasts PCM's permeability coefficient determined by constant head and falling head methods. Numerous studies compare permeability coefficients in pervious concrete using these methods, but not for finer aggregate cement-based composite materials like pervious cement mortar. PCM uses fine aggregate (0.6 – 0.85 mm) at 3, 5, and 10 cm thickness with S/C ratios of 4 and 5. Findings show that S/C 5 specimens have significantly higher porosity than S/C 4. The S/C ratios notably impact permeability; the higher ratio means the higher permeability. Permeability coefficients for S/C 4 ranging from 0.006 – 0.075 cm/s, while S/C 5 ranging from 0.010 to 0.147 cm/s. The relationship between the permeability coefficient between the constant head and falling head methods at the age of 90 days specimen are Kc = 1.0516 Kf (S/C 4.2) and Kc = 0.9325 Kf (S/C 5.2). According to these findings, finer aggregates result in a significantly smaller permeability, to the extent that the constant head method is more reliable compared to the falling head method.","PeriodicalId":35468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-44066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The modified pervious concrete and cement mortar, known as pervious cement mortar (PCM), is designed with a specific composition to create pores. The coarse aggregate is removed to form smaller pore sizes. PCM acts as a water filter, needing higher permeability than cement mortar but less than pervious concrete. Its pores drain water while trapping impurities. This study compares the effects of sand-to-cement ratio (S/C), specimen thickness, and age on permeability and porosity. It also contrasts PCM's permeability coefficient determined by constant head and falling head methods. Numerous studies compare permeability coefficients in pervious concrete using these methods, but not for finer aggregate cement-based composite materials like pervious cement mortar. PCM uses fine aggregate (0.6 – 0.85 mm) at 3, 5, and 10 cm thickness with S/C ratios of 4 and 5. Findings show that S/C 5 specimens have significantly higher porosity than S/C 4. The S/C ratios notably impact permeability; the higher ratio means the higher permeability. Permeability coefficients for S/C 4 ranging from 0.006 – 0.075 cm/s, while S/C 5 ranging from 0.010 to 0.147 cm/s. The relationship between the permeability coefficient between the constant head and falling head methods at the age of 90 days specimen are Kc = 1.0516 Kf (S/C 4.2) and Kc = 0.9325 Kf (S/C 5.2). According to these findings, finer aggregates result in a significantly smaller permeability, to the extent that the constant head method is more reliable compared to the falling head method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用恒水头法和降水头法测量的透水水泥砂浆渗透系数
改性透水混凝土和水泥砂浆,即透水水泥砂浆 (PCM),采用特定成分设计,以形成孔隙。粗骨料被去除,以形成较小的孔隙。PCM 具有滤水作用,需要比水泥砂浆更高的渗透性,但低于透水混凝土。它的孔隙可以排水,同时截留杂质。本研究比较了砂灰比 (S/C)、试样厚度和龄期对渗透性和孔隙率的影响。它还对比了通过恒定水头法和下降水头法确定的 PCM 渗透系数。许多研究都使用这些方法对透水混凝土的渗透系数进行了比较,但没有对透水水泥砂浆等以水泥为基础的细骨料复合材料的渗透系数进行比较。PCM 使用厚度为 3、5 和 10 厘米的细骨料(0.6 - 0.85 毫米),S/C 比为 4 和 5。研究结果表明,S/C 5 试样的孔隙率明显高于 S/C 4。S/C 比率对渗透性有显著影响;比率越高,渗透性越大。S/C 4 的渗透系数在 0.006 - 0.075 厘米/秒之间,而 S/C 5 的渗透系数在 0.010 - 0.147 厘米/秒之间。在 90 天龄期的试样中,恒定水头法和水头下降法的渗透系数之间的关系分别为 Kc = 1.0516 Kf(S/C 4.2)和 Kc = 0.9325 Kf(S/C 5.2)。根据这些研究结果,较细的集料会导致明显较小的渗透率,因此恒定水头法比下降水头法更可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
Journal of Applied Engineering Science Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 2002 iipp build cooperation with its clients established on wealthy experience, interchangeable respect and trust and permanently arrangement with the purpose of successfully realization of projects recognizable according to good organization and high quality of provided favors. Working as unique team of highly motivated experts, Institute iipp provides to its customers the most high-quality solutions in domain of engineering consulting.
期刊最新文献
SIMULATION MODELING OF LOGGING HARVESTER MOVEMENTS DURING SELECTIVE LOGGING RISK MITIGATION AS A MEDIATING FACTOR IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TOP MANAGEMENT SUPPORT AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PERFORMANCE 3D DOCUMENTATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FACTOR ON RURAL ARTERIAL ROADS RESTORATION OF LARGE MODULAR TEETH OF BALL MILL GEARS BY ELECTRO-SLAG SURFACE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1