Easier and More Enjoyable: Recognizing Mistakes by English Foreign Language (EFL) Learners Across Gender

Neda Moezzipour, Jassem Fathabadi
{"title":"Easier and More Enjoyable: Recognizing Mistakes by English Foreign Language (EFL) Learners Across Gender","authors":"Neda Moezzipour, Jassem Fathabadi","doi":"10.37256/ser.5120243564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Daniel Kahneman asserted that recognizing others’ mistakes is both easier and more enjoyable. The current study aimed at testing this claim in the context of English language learning among Iranians with regards to grammar tests. To this end, 150 Iranian advanced English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners (75 males and 75 females) took a grammar test consisting of 25 error-recognition and 25 multiple-choice items. They were also asked to report the amount of enjoyment they experienced while answering each type of items. A series of independent samples t-test revealed that male learners performed significantly better on the first type of items while females outscored males in the second type. Moreover, males reported more enjoyment for error-recognition items while the exact opposite was the case for female participants. In other words, the findings revealed that, taking into account the modifications that had to be made to operationalize concepts in this study, Kahneman’s statement held ground for male language learners but not females. The bottom line is that this difference was observed across gender and further investigations might shed more light on the reasons behind it. Meanwhile, the results suggest that test designers should put more thought into putting different types of items on grammar tests to avoid tipping the scale to the advantage of one gender.","PeriodicalId":509946,"journal":{"name":"Social Education Research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.5120243564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Daniel Kahneman asserted that recognizing others’ mistakes is both easier and more enjoyable. The current study aimed at testing this claim in the context of English language learning among Iranians with regards to grammar tests. To this end, 150 Iranian advanced English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners (75 males and 75 females) took a grammar test consisting of 25 error-recognition and 25 multiple-choice items. They were also asked to report the amount of enjoyment they experienced while answering each type of items. A series of independent samples t-test revealed that male learners performed significantly better on the first type of items while females outscored males in the second type. Moreover, males reported more enjoyment for error-recognition items while the exact opposite was the case for female participants. In other words, the findings revealed that, taking into account the modifications that had to be made to operationalize concepts in this study, Kahneman’s statement held ground for male language learners but not females. The bottom line is that this difference was observed across gender and further investigations might shed more light on the reasons behind it. Meanwhile, the results suggest that test designers should put more thought into putting different types of items on grammar tests to avoid tipping the scale to the advantage of one gender.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更轻松、更愉快:识别不同性别英语外语 (EFL) 学习者的错误
丹尼尔-卡尼曼(Daniel Kahneman)断言,认识他人的错误既容易又愉快。本研究旨在结合伊朗人在语法测试方面的英语学习情况,对这一说法进行检验。为此,150 名伊朗高级英语作为外语(EFL)学习者(75 名男性和 75 名女性)参加了语法测试,其中包括 25 个错误识别和 25 个多项选择题。他们还被要求报告在回答每类题目时所体验到的乐趣。一系列独立样本 t 检验显示,男性学习者在第一类题目中的表现明显更好,而女性在第二类题目中的表现则优于男性。此外,男性学习者在错误识别类题目中表现出更多的乐趣,而女性学习者则恰恰相反。换句话说,研究结果表明,考虑到在本研究中必须对概念的可操作性进行修改,卡尼曼的说法对男性语言学习者成立,但对女性语言学习者却不成立。最重要的是,这种差异是在不同性别中观察到的,进一步的调查可能会更清楚地揭示其背后的原因。同时,研究结果表明,测验设计者应更多地考虑在语法测验中加入不同类型的项目,以避免测验的尺度偏向于某一性别的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Relevance and Availability of Instructional Materials for Biology Education in Awka South Local Government Area Enhancing Senior Secondary School Students' Academic Performance in Chemistry Through the Implementation of Think-Pair-Share Strategy Evaluating the Impact of Instructional Materials on Social Studies Learning Outcomes in Senior High Schools of the Bono East Region of Ghana Effects of Drug Abuse on the Academic Performance of Students of Selected Tertiary Institutions in Lagos, Nigeria Perceptions of Social Studies Teachers on Teaching Rationale in New Juaben Senior High Schools, Ghana: A Qualitative Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1