The Relationships between Adverse Weather, Traffic Mobility, and Driver Behavior

Ayman Elyoussoufi, Curtis L. Walker, Alan W. Black, Gregory J. DeGirolamo
{"title":"The Relationships between Adverse Weather, Traffic Mobility, and Driver Behavior","authors":"Ayman Elyoussoufi, Curtis L. Walker, Alan W. Black, Gregory J. DeGirolamo","doi":"10.3390/meteorology2040028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Adverse weather conditions impact mobility, safety, and the behavior of drivers on roads. In an average year, approximately 21% of U.S. highway crashes are weather-related. Collectively, these crashes result in over 5300 fatalities each year. As a proof-of-concept, analyzing weather information in the context of traffic mobility data can provide unique insights into driver behavior and actions transportation agencies can pursue to promote safety and efficiency. Using 2019 weather and traffic data along Colorado Highway 119 between Boulder and Longmont, this research analyzed the relationship between adverse weather and traffic conditions. The data were classified into distinct weather types, day of the week, and the direction of travel to capture commuter traffic flows. Novel traffic information crowdsourced from smartphones provided metrics such as volume, speed, trip length, trip duration, and the purpose of travel. The data showed that snow days had a smaller traffic volume than clear and rainy days, with an All Times volume of approximately 18,000 vehicles for each direction of travel, as opposed to 21,000 vehicles for both clear and wet conditions. From a trip purpose perspective, the data showed that the percentage of travel between home and work locations was 21.4% during a snow day compared to 20.6% for rain and 19.6% for clear days. The overall traffic volume reduction during snow days is likely due to drivers deciding to avoid commuting; however, the relative increase in the home–work travel percentage is likely attributable to less discretionary travel in lieu of essential work travel. In comparison, the increase in traffic volume during rainy days may be due to commuters being less likely to walk, bike, or take public transit during inclement weather. This study demonstrates the insight into human behavior by analyzing impact on traffic parameters during adverse weather travel.","PeriodicalId":506871,"journal":{"name":"Meteorology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/meteorology2040028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adverse weather conditions impact mobility, safety, and the behavior of drivers on roads. In an average year, approximately 21% of U.S. highway crashes are weather-related. Collectively, these crashes result in over 5300 fatalities each year. As a proof-of-concept, analyzing weather information in the context of traffic mobility data can provide unique insights into driver behavior and actions transportation agencies can pursue to promote safety and efficiency. Using 2019 weather and traffic data along Colorado Highway 119 between Boulder and Longmont, this research analyzed the relationship between adverse weather and traffic conditions. The data were classified into distinct weather types, day of the week, and the direction of travel to capture commuter traffic flows. Novel traffic information crowdsourced from smartphones provided metrics such as volume, speed, trip length, trip duration, and the purpose of travel. The data showed that snow days had a smaller traffic volume than clear and rainy days, with an All Times volume of approximately 18,000 vehicles for each direction of travel, as opposed to 21,000 vehicles for both clear and wet conditions. From a trip purpose perspective, the data showed that the percentage of travel between home and work locations was 21.4% during a snow day compared to 20.6% for rain and 19.6% for clear days. The overall traffic volume reduction during snow days is likely due to drivers deciding to avoid commuting; however, the relative increase in the home–work travel percentage is likely attributable to less discretionary travel in lieu of essential work travel. In comparison, the increase in traffic volume during rainy days may be due to commuters being less likely to walk, bike, or take public transit during inclement weather. This study demonstrates the insight into human behavior by analyzing impact on traffic parameters during adverse weather travel.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶劣天气、交通流动性和驾驶员行为之间的关系
恶劣的天气条件会影响交通、安全以及驾驶员在道路上的行为。平均每年约有 21% 的美国高速公路交通事故与天气有关。这些车祸每年共造成 5300 多人死亡。作为概念验证,在交通流动性数据的背景下分析天气信息,可以为驾驶员行为提供独特的见解,并为交通机构提供促进安全和效率的行动。本研究利用博尔德和朗蒙特之间科罗拉多州 119 号公路沿线的 2019 年天气和交通数据,分析了恶劣天气与交通状况之间的关系。数据被分为不同的天气类型、星期和行驶方向,以捕捉通勤交通流。通过智能手机众包的新颖交通信息提供了交通流量、速度、行程长度、行程持续时间和出行目的等指标。数据显示,雪天的交通流量小于晴天和雨天,晴天和雨天各方向的全时段交通流量约为 18,000 架次,而晴天和雨天的全时段交通流量均为 21,000 架次。从出行目的的角度来看,数据显示,雪天从家到工作地点的出行比例为 21.4%,而雨天为 20.6%,晴天为 19.6%。雪天的总体交通流量减少可能是由于驾驶员决定避免通勤;然而,往返家庭和工作地点的出行比例相对增加可能是由于减少了代替必要工作出行的随意出行。相比之下,雨天交通流量的增加可能是由于通勤者在恶劣天气下更少选择步行、骑自行车或乘坐公共交通。这项研究通过分析恶劣天气对交通参数的影响,展示了对人类行为的洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Drought Vulnerability in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest Using High-Frequency Data Tropical and Subtropical South American Intraseasonal Variability: A Normal-Mode Approach On the Human Thermal Load in Fog On the Human Thermal Load in Fog A Wind Field Reconstruction from Numerical Weather Prediction Data Based on a Meteo Particle Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1