Feminist Collective Interpretation: Interpretation as Analysis

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Qualitative Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-11-18 DOI:10.1177/10778004231198120
Dajanae Palmer, Darcy E. Furlong, Samantha Silberstein, Alycia Elfreich, Barbara Dennis, Pengfei Zhao, Suparna Bose, L. Carspecken, Karyn Housh, Rossmary D. Márquez-Lameda, Pooja Saxena, Sylvia Washington
{"title":"Feminist Collective Interpretation: Interpretation as Analysis","authors":"Dajanae Palmer, Darcy E. Furlong, Samantha Silberstein, Alycia Elfreich, Barbara Dennis, Pengfei Zhao, Suparna Bose, L. Carspecken, Karyn Housh, Rossmary D. Márquez-Lameda, Pooja Saxena, Sylvia Washington","doi":"10.1177/10778004231198120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpretation is a key aspect to any qualitative research process. Inherent in analysis, researchers must ask what informs interpretations and whose interpretations are accepted as reality. These questions call attention to power and its connection with interpretational practices, while some might argue that it would be impossible to render any interpretations that are data. In this article, we describe our own feminist, collective analytic interpretation as being guided by a set of commitments rather than a set of procedures or a guiding theoretical framework. We highlight how our approach to collective interpretation through a set of feminist commitments is achieved. Then, we outline those commitments, leaving readers with an idea of how to build a feminist collectivist interpretation process into their own work specifically or contemplate the collaborative nature of interpretation in analysis of qualitative data more broadly.","PeriodicalId":48395,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Inquiry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778004231198120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretation is a key aspect to any qualitative research process. Inherent in analysis, researchers must ask what informs interpretations and whose interpretations are accepted as reality. These questions call attention to power and its connection with interpretational practices, while some might argue that it would be impossible to render any interpretations that are data. In this article, we describe our own feminist, collective analytic interpretation as being guided by a set of commitments rather than a set of procedures or a guiding theoretical framework. We highlight how our approach to collective interpretation through a set of feminist commitments is achieved. Then, we outline those commitments, leaving readers with an idea of how to build a feminist collectivist interpretation process into their own work specifically or contemplate the collaborative nature of interpretation in analysis of qualitative data more broadly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女权主义集体阐释:解读即分析
解释是任何定性研究过程的一个关键方面。在分析过程中,研究人员必须询问是什么影响了解释,以及谁的解释被接受为现实。这些问题需要关注权力及其与解释实践之间的联系,而有些人可能会说,不可能有任何解释是数据化的。在本文中,我们将自己的女性主义集体分析解释描述为由一系列承诺而非一系列程序或指导性理论框架所引导。我们强调了如何通过一系列女性主义承诺来实现我们的集体阐释方法。然后,我们概述了这些承诺,让读者了解如何在自己的工作中具体建立女性主义集体主义阐释过程,或更广泛地思考定性数据分析中阐释的合作性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Inquiry
Qualitative Inquiry SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
143
期刊介绍: Qualitative Inquiry provides an interdisciplinary forum for qualitative methodology and related issues in the human sciences. With Qualitative Inquiry you have access to lively dialogues, current research and the latest developments in qualitative methodology.
期刊最新文献
Teaching Postqualitatively Feeling or Funding? Critical Coproduction, Rationality, Emotionality, and Axiological Reflections The Researcher’s Facilitating Role in Stimulating a Constructive Group Climate in Online Focus-Group Interviews Danger, Desire, and Disclosure: A Postqualitative Trauma-Informed Approach to the Ethics of Secrets and Emotion in Qualitative Research Humility, Textuality, and Method in Phenomenological Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1