Microbial induced nitrogen recycling in bio-geochemical decomposition sites

Adrian John
{"title":"Microbial induced nitrogen recycling in bio-geochemical decomposition sites","authors":"Adrian John","doi":"10.59411/h90hxs51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: The sporadic introduction of deceased plant and animal matter into soils is pivotal in reincorporating organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) compounds into biogeochemical cycles. The breakdown of animal remains offers a rich reservoir of C and N, stimulating both local environmental microbial communities and introducing external microbes stemming from the carcasses. Nonetheless, the interactions within these blended microbial communities and the respective impacts of environment- and carcass-originating microbes on C and N cycling remain uncertain. To determine whether environment-derived, carcass-derived, or the merged microbial communities exerted a greater influence on C and N cycling, we conducted controlled laboratory experiments mimicking carcass decomposition hotspots by combining carcass decomposition fluids with soils. We selectively sterilized the decomposition fluid and/or soil to remove microbial communities, creating distinct combinations of environment- and carcass-derived communities, and incubated the treatments at three temperatures (around 15, 25, and 35 °C). Findings: Carcass-sourced bacteria persisted in soils in our simulated decomposition scenarios, albeit in modest quantities. Hybrid communities demonstrated increased respiration rates at around 15 and 35 °C compared to singular soil or carcass communities. Interestingly, at higher temperatures, mixed communities exhibited reduced diversity but higher respiration, suggesting functional overlap. Additionally, mixed community treatments furnished evidence that microbes linked with carcasses might play a role in ammonification and denitrification, while nitrification was mainly carried out by indigenous soil organisms. Conclusions: Our investigation yields valuable insights into the dynamics of microbial communities converging during carcass decomposition and their functions in the recycling of carcasses within terrestrial ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":508065,"journal":{"name":"Microbial journal","volume":"208 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59411/h90hxs51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The sporadic introduction of deceased plant and animal matter into soils is pivotal in reincorporating organic carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) compounds into biogeochemical cycles. The breakdown of animal remains offers a rich reservoir of C and N, stimulating both local environmental microbial communities and introducing external microbes stemming from the carcasses. Nonetheless, the interactions within these blended microbial communities and the respective impacts of environment- and carcass-originating microbes on C and N cycling remain uncertain. To determine whether environment-derived, carcass-derived, or the merged microbial communities exerted a greater influence on C and N cycling, we conducted controlled laboratory experiments mimicking carcass decomposition hotspots by combining carcass decomposition fluids with soils. We selectively sterilized the decomposition fluid and/or soil to remove microbial communities, creating distinct combinations of environment- and carcass-derived communities, and incubated the treatments at three temperatures (around 15, 25, and 35 °C). Findings: Carcass-sourced bacteria persisted in soils in our simulated decomposition scenarios, albeit in modest quantities. Hybrid communities demonstrated increased respiration rates at around 15 and 35 °C compared to singular soil or carcass communities. Interestingly, at higher temperatures, mixed communities exhibited reduced diversity but higher respiration, suggesting functional overlap. Additionally, mixed community treatments furnished evidence that microbes linked with carcasses might play a role in ammonification and denitrification, while nitrification was mainly carried out by indigenous soil organisms. Conclusions: Our investigation yields valuable insights into the dynamics of microbial communities converging during carcass decomposition and their functions in the recycling of carcasses within terrestrial ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物地球化学分解场中的微生物诱导氮再循环
背景:零星的动植物尸体进入土壤,对于将有机碳(C)和氮(N)化合物重新纳入生物地球化学循环至关重要。动物遗骸的分解提供了一个丰富的碳和氮库,既能刺激当地环境微生物群落,又能从尸体中引入外部微生物。然而,这些混合微生物群落内部的相互作用以及环境微生物和来自尸体的微生物各自对碳和氮循环的影响仍不确定。为了确定是环境源微生物群落、尸体源微生物群落还是混合微生物群落对碳和氮循环的影响更大,我们将尸体分解液与土壤结合起来,进行了模拟尸体分解热点的实验室对照实验。我们对分解液和/或土壤进行了选择性消毒,以去除微生物群落,从而创造出不同的环境和尸体衍生群落组合,并在三种温度下(约 15、25 和 35 °C)培养处理。研究结果在我们模拟的分解情景中,源自尸体的细菌在土壤中持续存在,尽管数量不多。与单一的土壤或尸体群落相比,混合群落在 15 和 35 °C左右时的呼吸速率有所提高。有趣的是,在温度较高的情况下,混合群落的多样性降低,但呼吸速率提高,这表明存在功能重叠。此外,混合群落处理提供的证据表明,与尸体有关的微生物可能在氨化和反硝化作用中发挥作用,而硝化作用主要由本地土壤生物进行。结论我们的研究为了解尸体分解过程中微生物群落的动态及其在陆地生态系统中尸体循环过程中的功能提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacological Activities of Reishi (Ganoderma Lucidum): Potent Medicinal Mushroom Bio-Ethanol Production from Wheat Straw Using Yeast Isolates Status in Malaria Vaccine Development: Basic aspects of Vaccinology mechanism of actions, vaccine pipelines, stage oriented immune response ‘Challenges and Opportunities’ Microbial induced nitrogen recycling in bio-geochemical decomposition sites Microbial dynamics in Manaus river, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1