Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Methods for the Treatment of Surgical Soft Tissue Infection

Okhunov Ao
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Methods for the Treatment of Surgical Soft Tissue Infection","authors":"Okhunov Ao","doi":"10.29328/journal.ijcmbt.1001027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The presence of a multifaceted microbiological etiological factor of surgical infection and differentiated sensitivity to antibacterial drugs determines the need to develop more effective means and methods of influencing the purulent microflora of wounds. Physical treatment factors, in particular, low-frequency ultrasound and ionised plasma flows, should be considered promising for solving this problem. Materials and methods: The research was carried out based on the Scientific Center of Microbiology and the clinic of the Tashkent Medical Academy. Bacteriological studies of wound discharge and biopsy material were carried out. We studied the material of purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Results: Wound-sounding through a dioxidine solution is most effective against gram-negative bacteria, and ultrasonic cavitation in combination with iodopyrone is most effective against gram-positive microorganisms. Treatment of purulent wounds with low-frequency ultrasound through a mixture of iodopyrone solution and ascorbic acid is effective against gram-positive and gram-negative microbes. Argon plasma flows have a high bactericidal effect mainly on gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion: The obtained data substantiate the need to choose a physical method of treatment of purulent wounds depending on the species composition of the wound microflora.","PeriodicalId":142966,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Biochemical Technology","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Biochemical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.ijcmbt.1001027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The presence of a multifaceted microbiological etiological factor of surgical infection and differentiated sensitivity to antibacterial drugs determines the need to develop more effective means and methods of influencing the purulent microflora of wounds. Physical treatment factors, in particular, low-frequency ultrasound and ionised plasma flows, should be considered promising for solving this problem. Materials and methods: The research was carried out based on the Scientific Center of Microbiology and the clinic of the Tashkent Medical Academy. Bacteriological studies of wound discharge and biopsy material were carried out. We studied the material of purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Results: Wound-sounding through a dioxidine solution is most effective against gram-negative bacteria, and ultrasonic cavitation in combination with iodopyrone is most effective against gram-positive microorganisms. Treatment of purulent wounds with low-frequency ultrasound through a mixture of iodopyrone solution and ascorbic acid is effective against gram-positive and gram-negative microbes. Argon plasma flows have a high bactericidal effect mainly on gram-negative bacteria. Conclusion: The obtained data substantiate the need to choose a physical method of treatment of purulent wounds depending on the species composition of the wound microflora.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术软组织感染治疗方法效果的比较评估
背景:手术感染的微生物病因是多方面的,而且对抗菌药物的敏感性也存在差异,因此需要开发更有效的手段和方法来影响伤口的化脓性微生物菌群。物理治疗因素,尤其是低频超声波和离子化等离子流,应被视为解决这一问题的有效方法。材料和方法:研究在塔什干医学院微生物科学中心和诊所进行。对伤口分泌物和活检材料进行了细菌学研究。我们研究了软组织化脓性炎症的材料。研究结果通过二恶烷溶液进行伤口探查对革兰氏阴性细菌最有效,而超声波空化结合碘吡酮对革兰氏阳性微生物最有效。用碘比龙溶液和抗坏血酸的混合物进行低频超声治疗化脓性伤口,对革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性微生物均有效。氩等离子流主要对革兰氏阴性菌有很强的杀菌作用。结论所获得的数据证明,有必要根据伤口微生物菌群的种类选择物理方法来治疗化脓性伤口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trends of Antibiotic Resistance among Uropathogens in Medical vs. Non-Medical Departments of Al-Shifa Medical Complex in Gaza Strip: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Methods for the Treatment of Surgical Soft Tissue Infection Hypochlorous acid has emerged as a potential alternative to conventional antibiotics due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity Biopesticides use on cotton and their harmful effects on human health & environment Association between clinical forms of leprosy and contacts with the vaccination state with BCG in five endemic municipalities in the Brazilian Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1