Relationship Between Lifelong Learning Tendencies and Self-directed Learning Skills of Teacher Candidates

Dilek Beypinar, Sadık Yüksel Sivaci
{"title":"Relationship Between Lifelong Learning Tendencies and Self-directed Learning Skills of Teacher Candidates","authors":"Dilek Beypinar, Sadık Yüksel Sivaci","doi":"10.51535/tell.1364894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the research is to investigate the relationship between teacher candidates’ lifelong learning tendencies and self-directed learning skills. The research was conducted by the relational research method. The sample contains 529 teacher candidates who were selected by maximum diversity sampling method. In the research, “Personal Information Form” was used to obtain information about demographic characteristics of teacher candidates. “Lifelong Learning Tendencies (LLT)” scale developed by Diker-Coşkun (2009) was used to determine the lifelong learning tendencies of teacher candidates and “Self-Directed Learning Skills (SDLS)” scale developed by Aşkın Tekkol and Demirel (2018) was used to determine self-directed learning skills. Descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA and correlation analyzes were used to find answers to the research questions. As a result of the research, LLT and SDLS of teacher candidates are at high levels. Additionally, it was revealed that the LLT scores of teacher candidates differ significantly according to gender, CGPA (Cumulative Grade Points Average) of teacher candidates and their reasons for choosing departments. When the SDLS of teacher candidates examined, it is found that SDLS of teacher candidates did not differ significantly according to gender. Also, it was revealed that the SDLS scores of teacher candidates differ significantly according to CGPA of teacher candidates and their reasons for choosing departments. Furthermore, the relationships between the sub-dimensions of the variables are examined by Pearson correlation analysis and the analysis revealed generally positive and moderately to highly significant relationships between different dimentions of LLT and SDLS of prospective teachers.","PeriodicalId":127236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Teacher Education and Lifelong Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1364894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the research is to investigate the relationship between teacher candidates’ lifelong learning tendencies and self-directed learning skills. The research was conducted by the relational research method. The sample contains 529 teacher candidates who were selected by maximum diversity sampling method. In the research, “Personal Information Form” was used to obtain information about demographic characteristics of teacher candidates. “Lifelong Learning Tendencies (LLT)” scale developed by Diker-Coşkun (2009) was used to determine the lifelong learning tendencies of teacher candidates and “Self-Directed Learning Skills (SDLS)” scale developed by Aşkın Tekkol and Demirel (2018) was used to determine self-directed learning skills. Descriptive statistics, t-test, ANOVA and correlation analyzes were used to find answers to the research questions. As a result of the research, LLT and SDLS of teacher candidates are at high levels. Additionally, it was revealed that the LLT scores of teacher candidates differ significantly according to gender, CGPA (Cumulative Grade Points Average) of teacher candidates and their reasons for choosing departments. When the SDLS of teacher candidates examined, it is found that SDLS of teacher candidates did not differ significantly according to gender. Also, it was revealed that the SDLS scores of teacher candidates differ significantly according to CGPA of teacher candidates and their reasons for choosing departments. Furthermore, the relationships between the sub-dimensions of the variables are examined by Pearson correlation analysis and the analysis revealed generally positive and moderately to highly significant relationships between different dimentions of LLT and SDLS of prospective teachers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
师范生终身学习倾向与自主学习能力之间的关系
本研究旨在调查师范生的终身学习倾向与自主学习技能之间的关系。研究采用关系研究法。样本包含 529 名师范生,采用最大多样性抽样法选出。研究中使用了 "个人信息表 "来获取师范生的人口统计学特征信息。迪克-科斯昆(2009)编制的 "终身学习倾向(LLT)"量表用于确定师范生的终身学习倾向,阿斯克恩-特科尔和德米雷尔(2018)编制的 "自主学习技能(SDLS)"量表用于确定自主学习技能。研究使用了描述性统计、t 检验、方差分析和相关分析来寻找研究问题的答案。研究结果表明,师范生的 LLT 和 SDLS 处于较高水平。此外,研究还发现,师范生的 LLT 分数因性别、师范生的 CGPA(累积平均学分绩点)和师范生选择院系的原因而存在显著差异。在研究师范生的 SDLS 时,发现师范生的 SDLS 在性别上没有明显差异。同时,根据师范生的 CGPA 和他们选择院系的原因,师范生的 SDLS 分数也有显著差异。此外,还通过皮尔逊相关分析研究了变量子维度之间的关系,分析结果显示,LLT 的不同维度与未来教师的 SDLS 之间总体上呈正相关,且存在中度到高度显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Emergency Distance Education Based Lifelong Learning Environment Use from Student Perspective: A Phenomenological Research The Effect of The Modified Solve It! Strategy on The Mathematical Problem Solving Skills of Students with Learning Difficulties Determination of Secondary School Students' Misconceptions About the Concept of Seed with the Four-Tier Misconception Diagnostic Test Assessment of an In-Service Training Activity Transformed into an E-Learning Environment Using the Kirkpatrick Model The Mediating Role of Positive Rumination and Negative Rumination in the Relationship between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Interpersonal Problem Solving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1