Level of women involvement in gender mainstreaming policy implementation on decision making in Baringo County

Rebecca Arupe Lomong, P. Oino, Mildred Fedha Lumayu
{"title":"Level of women involvement in gender mainstreaming policy implementation on decision making in Baringo County","authors":"Rebecca Arupe Lomong, P. Oino, Mildred Fedha Lumayu","doi":"10.59765/cbvu2518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to visibly engender women's participation in decision-making became a growing global concern through the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Despite the Kenyan 2010 constitutional provisions for gender mainstreaming, little has changed. This study sought to examine the level of women involvement in gender mainstreaming policy implementation on decision making in Baringo County. The study was guided by Equity Feministic Theory by Sommers (1994). The study used cross-sectional survey design and mixed method approach. The target population was 2446 respondents comprising of employees, members of the County Assembly and Members of the Public Service Board. The sample size was based on Krejcie and Morgan (1970) sample size determination to arrive atsample size of 329 respondents. Questionnaires, Interview guides and FGDs were used to collect data. Reliability was determined through test-retest approach. The quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean and Standard deviation. Pearson Correlation and linear regression analysis were employed to determine relationship that exists between the independent and dependent variables. Qualitative data were thematically classified and arranged before they were re ported in narrations and quotations as per the research objectives. The study found out that there was a significant positive correlation between gender mainstreaming policy implementation on women political representation and women governance (r = .581; p = .000). The study recommends that there is need for streamlining of women appointment to senior positions in the county to allow for efficiency and inclusivity in governance","PeriodicalId":305882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59765/cbvu2518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need to visibly engender women's participation in decision-making became a growing global concern through the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Despite the Kenyan 2010 constitutional provisions for gender mainstreaming, little has changed. This study sought to examine the level of women involvement in gender mainstreaming policy implementation on decision making in Baringo County. The study was guided by Equity Feministic Theory by Sommers (1994). The study used cross-sectional survey design and mixed method approach. The target population was 2446 respondents comprising of employees, members of the County Assembly and Members of the Public Service Board. The sample size was based on Krejcie and Morgan (1970) sample size determination to arrive atsample size of 329 respondents. Questionnaires, Interview guides and FGDs were used to collect data. Reliability was determined through test-retest approach. The quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, mean and Standard deviation. Pearson Correlation and linear regression analysis were employed to determine relationship that exists between the independent and dependent variables. Qualitative data were thematically classified and arranged before they were re ported in narrations and quotations as per the research objectives. The study found out that there was a significant positive correlation between gender mainstreaming policy implementation on women political representation and women governance (r = .581; p = .000). The study recommends that there is need for streamlining of women appointment to senior positions in the county to allow for efficiency and inclusivity in governance
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴林戈县妇女参与性别平等主流化政策实施决策的程度
通过《消除对妇女一切形式歧视公约》(CEDAW),使妇女明显参与决策的必要性日益成为全球关注的问题。尽管肯尼亚 2010 年《宪法》规定要将性别观点纳入主流,但情况并没有什么变化。本研究旨在考察巴林戈县妇女参与性别主流化政策实施决策的程度。本研究以 Sommers(1994 年)的公平女性主义理论为指导。研究采用了横截面调查设计和混合方法。目标人群为 2446 名受访者,包括雇员、县议会议员和公共服务委员会成员。样本大小是根据 Krejcie 和 Morgan(1970 年)的样本大小确定的,得出的样本大小为 329 名受访者。收集数据时使用了问卷、访谈指南和 FGD。可靠性通过测试-再测试方法确定。定量数据采用频率、百分比、平均值和标准偏差进行分析。采用了皮尔逊相关分析和线性回归分析来确定自变量和因变量之间存在的关系。对定性数据进行了主题分类和整理,然后根据研究目标以叙述和引语的形式进行了重新整理。研究发现,性别主流化政策的实施与妇女政治代表性和妇女治理之间存在显著的正相关关系(r = 0.581;p = 0.000)。研究建议,有必要简化妇女担任郡内高级职位的任命程序,以提高治理的效率和包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project Management Strategies and Implementation of Youth Development Projects Funded by Business Development Fund (BDF), Rwanda: A Case of Gasabo District Capacity Building Techniques and Recidivism Prevention among the Prison Inmates in Selected Prisons in Nairobi County, Kenya Teachers' Views on Tanzania Corporal Punishment Legal Policy in Schools: Level and Manner of Implementation The Influence of Resource Planning Practices on Performance of Donor Funded Education Project in Rwanda: A Case of Food and Education Project, Gasabo District, Kigali City Role of Project Environment on Performance of Community Development Project. A Case of the Climate Resilient Post Harvest Agribusiness Support Project (PASP) IFAD-funded Project in Kirehe District, Rwanda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1