Peripheral centers: vertical politics and the geography of Chinese cross-border opium replacement in Southeast Asia’s “New Golden Triangle”

IF 1.7 2区 经济学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Eurasian Geography and Economics Pub Date : 2023-11-17 DOI:10.1080/15387216.2023.2266816
Juliet Lu, Michael B. Dwyer
{"title":"Peripheral centers: vertical politics and the geography of Chinese cross-border opium replacement in Southeast Asia’s “New Golden Triangle”","authors":"Juliet Lu, Michael B. Dwyer","doi":"10.1080/15387216.2023.2266816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT China’s Opium Replacement Policy (ORP) is one of the country’s earliest cross-border development interventions in the upper Mekong region. A massive state subsidy program for “alternative” development in the northern parts of Myanmar and Laos, the ORP helped finance a wave of Chinese agribusiness investments abroad since the mid-2000s, causing significant social and ecological transformation. Yet key details about the program remain opaque. In this article, we contribute to a growing literature on the rising economic power of China’s “peripheral centers,” borderland prefectures whose role in foreign affairs has increased significantly as the country’s borders become more porous. We review state motives for establishing the ORP and use public records about the program’s activities in Myanmar and Laos to interrogate the vertical politics that structure and complicate the ORP’s implementation. The program’s public records are characterized by a mix of transparency and opacity which we analyse to show that the ORP’s increasing transparency since around 2010 has moved away from regulating impacts abroad and instead toward securing and distributing benefits for borderland business (and their interlinked political) interests in China. As borderland authorities play a growing role in China’s foreign trade, we show that the vertical politics that increasingly shape the regulatory environment have allowed the ORP to proliferate in size and influence as state oversight of its activities abroad has waned.","PeriodicalId":47508,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","volume":"39 1","pages":"811 - 841"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Geography and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2023.2266816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT China’s Opium Replacement Policy (ORP) is one of the country’s earliest cross-border development interventions in the upper Mekong region. A massive state subsidy program for “alternative” development in the northern parts of Myanmar and Laos, the ORP helped finance a wave of Chinese agribusiness investments abroad since the mid-2000s, causing significant social and ecological transformation. Yet key details about the program remain opaque. In this article, we contribute to a growing literature on the rising economic power of China’s “peripheral centers,” borderland prefectures whose role in foreign affairs has increased significantly as the country’s borders become more porous. We review state motives for establishing the ORP and use public records about the program’s activities in Myanmar and Laos to interrogate the vertical politics that structure and complicate the ORP’s implementation. The program’s public records are characterized by a mix of transparency and opacity which we analyse to show that the ORP’s increasing transparency since around 2010 has moved away from regulating impacts abroad and instead toward securing and distributing benefits for borderland business (and their interlinked political) interests in China. As borderland authorities play a growing role in China’s foreign trade, we show that the vertical politics that increasingly shape the regulatory environment have allowed the ORP to proliferate in size and influence as state oversight of its activities abroad has waned.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外围中心:东南亚 "新金三角 "的垂直政治与中国跨境鸦片替代的地理格局
ABSTRACT 中国的鸦片替代政策(ORP)是中国在湄公河上游地区最早的跨境发展干预措施之一。鸦片替代政策是一项在缅甸和老挝北部地区进行 "替代 "发展的大规模国家补贴计划,自 2000 年代中期以来,该计划为中国农业综合企业的海外投资浪潮提供了资金支持,并引发了重大的社会和生态变革。然而,该计划的关键细节仍不透明。在这篇文章中,我们将为有关中国 "周边中心 "经济实力不断上升的文献做出贡献。随着中国边境管理日益松懈,边境地区的县级政府在外交事务中的作用显著增强。我们回顾了国家建立边境开放计划的动机,并利用有关该计划在缅甸和老挝开展活动的公开记录,探讨了使边境开放计划的实施结构化和复杂化的纵向政治。该项目公开记录的特点是透明与不透明并存,我们通过分析这些记录来说明,自 2010 年左右以来,边境开放计划的透明度不断提高,已不再是为了调节海外影响,而是为了确保和分配边境地区企业(及其相互关联的政治)在中国的利益。随着边境管理机构在中国对外贸易中扮演越来越重要的角色,我们发现,随着国家对边境管理机构海外活动的监督力度减弱,越来越多地影响监管环境的纵向政治使得边境管理机构的规模和影响力不断扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
2.60%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Eurasian Geography and Economics, a bimonthly affiliated with the Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies and the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies , will publish timely, original papers in geography and economics covering all states of the former USSR as well as Asiatic and European countries on or beyond their present borders within the Eurasian realm , with a particular emphasis on China .
期刊最新文献
Rethinking peripheral geographies of innovation: towards an ordinary periphery approach International rivers as national borders: the functional complexity of border river governance with a case study of the Khorgos river Logistical fixes and China’s spatial division of logistics integration - in search of economic rebalancing? Living together or apart? International migrants and family coresidence in Yiwu, China Peripheral centers: vertical politics and the geography of Chinese cross-border opium replacement in Southeast Asia’s “New Golden Triangle”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1