A Bumpy Ride for China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Kazakhstan: Findings from a University Survey

Q2 Social Sciences Journal of Current Chinese Affairs Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1177/18681026231211354
Christopher B. Primiano, Alma Kudebayeva
{"title":"A Bumpy Ride for China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Kazakhstan: Findings from a University Survey","authors":"Christopher B. Primiano, Alma Kudebayeva","doi":"10.1177/18681026231211354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been a polarising issue throughout the world, with analysts viewing it as either advancing China's desire to remake the world according to its plans, having the potential for, or indeed about, mutual benefit, or too ad-hoc and thus impossible to predict how it will develop. In this article, we present our findings from a survey that we conducted with university students in Almaty, Kazakhstan on views towards BRI. There are two main findings. First, the majority of our participants view BRI as bad for Kazakhstan. Second, one's political views, specifically whether one embraces authoritarian or conservative views (on the one hand) or democratic views (on the other), correlate with the way that person views BRI. In particular, we found that those who espouse authoritarian or conservative views consistently and with statistical significance view the initiative in higher regard than those who embrace democratic political views. To explain this pattern, we draw from social identity theory.","PeriodicalId":37907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Chinese Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18681026231211354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been a polarising issue throughout the world, with analysts viewing it as either advancing China's desire to remake the world according to its plans, having the potential for, or indeed about, mutual benefit, or too ad-hoc and thus impossible to predict how it will develop. In this article, we present our findings from a survey that we conducted with university students in Almaty, Kazakhstan on views towards BRI. There are two main findings. First, the majority of our participants view BRI as bad for Kazakhstan. Second, one's political views, specifically whether one embraces authoritarian or conservative views (on the one hand) or democratic views (on the other), correlate with the way that person views BRI. In particular, we found that those who espouse authoritarian or conservative views consistently and with statistical significance view the initiative in higher regard than those who embrace democratic political views. To explain this pattern, we draw from social identity theory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国 "一带一路 "倡议在哈萨克斯坦的坎坷历程:一项大学调查的结果
中国的 "一带一路 "倡议(BRI)一直是世界上一个两极分化的问题,分析家们要么认为该倡议推进了中国按照自己的计划改造世界的愿望,具有互惠互利的潜力,要么认为该倡议过于临时,因此无法预测其将如何发展。在本文中,我们将介绍我们对哈萨克斯坦阿拉木图的大学生进行的一项关于对 BRI 的看法的调查的结果。主要调查结果有两个。首先,大多数参与者认为金砖倡议对哈萨克斯坦不利。其次,一个人的政治观点,特别是他是否拥护专制或保守观点(一方面)或民主观点(另一方面),与他对 BRI 的看法相关。特别是,我们发现,那些拥护专制或保守观点的人比那些拥护民主政治观点的人对该倡议的评价更高,而且具有统计学意义。为了解释这种模式,我们借鉴了社会认同理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs
Journal of Current Chinese Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs is an internationally refereed academic journal published by the GIGA Institute of Asian Studies, Hamburg. The journal focuses on current developments in Greater China. It is simultaneously published (three times per year) online as an Open Access journal and as a printed version with a circulation of 1,000 copies, making it one of the world’s most widely read periodicals on Asian affairs. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, unlike some other Open Access publications, does not charge its authors any fee. The Journal of Current Chinese Affairs reaches a broad international readership in academia, administration and business circles. It is devoted to the transfer of scholarly insights to a wide audience. The journal is committed to publishing high-quality, original research on current issues in China in a format and style that is accessible across disciplines and to professionals with an interest in the region. The editors welcome contributions on current affairs within Greater China, including Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. Submissions can focus on emerging topics and current developments as well as on future-oriented debates in the fields of China''s global and regional roles; political, economic and social developments including foreign affairs, business, finance, cultural industries, religion, education, science and technology; and so on.
期刊最新文献
Community Building Through Screen Sharing: Community Screening as Cultural Practice in Postmillennial Hong Kong and Beyond Fandom as Method: Decolonising Research on Social Media Communications Through Chinese Transnational Fandoms of a Japanese Olympic Figure Skater Intra-Party Rules: Rebuilding the Chinese Communist Party’s Political Ecology “Telling China's Story Well” Through Higher Education Along the New Silk Road International Migration Framing in the Global Times (2012–2022): Constructing Identity Narrative About the Self and the Other
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1