Harmonizing Biological and Chemical Strategies for Hazardous Chemical Detoxification: An Integrative Review

L. O. Ajala, Cynthia Chioma Anyiam, Chukwudum Albert Anyiam
{"title":"Harmonizing Biological and Chemical Strategies for Hazardous Chemical Detoxification: An Integrative Review","authors":"L. O. Ajala, Cynthia Chioma Anyiam, Chukwudum Albert Anyiam","doi":"10.9734/csji/2023/v32i6868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management and mitigation of hazardous chemicals pose significant challenges to environmental and human health. This comprehensive review critically examines the efficacy of biological and chemical methods for the detoxification of hazardous chemicals. Hazardous chemicals, ranging from organic pollutants to heavy metals, often contaminate soil, water, and air, leading to adverse ecological and health impacts. Traditional chemical-based approaches have limitations, such as secondary pollutant generation and high operational costs. In contrast, biological methods harness the metabolic activities of microorganisms, plants, and enzymes to transform or degrade hazardous compounds. This review evaluates the performance of biological systems, including bioremediation, phytoremediation, and enzyme-based approaches, in detoxifying various classes of hazardous chemicals. Additionally, chemical methods, such as advanced oxidation processes, redox reactions, and adsorption, are scrutinized for their efficiency in chemical degradation and transformation. The comparative analysis considers factors like effectiveness, cost, environmental impact, and applicability to different chemical classes. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these detoxification approaches is essential for informed decision-making in environmental remediation and industrial processes. This review offers valuable insights into the selection of appropriate detoxification methods, based on the nature of the hazardous chemicals and the desired environmental and economic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9803,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Science International Journal","volume":"88 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Science International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/csji/2023/v32i6868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management and mitigation of hazardous chemicals pose significant challenges to environmental and human health. This comprehensive review critically examines the efficacy of biological and chemical methods for the detoxification of hazardous chemicals. Hazardous chemicals, ranging from organic pollutants to heavy metals, often contaminate soil, water, and air, leading to adverse ecological and health impacts. Traditional chemical-based approaches have limitations, such as secondary pollutant generation and high operational costs. In contrast, biological methods harness the metabolic activities of microorganisms, plants, and enzymes to transform or degrade hazardous compounds. This review evaluates the performance of biological systems, including bioremediation, phytoremediation, and enzyme-based approaches, in detoxifying various classes of hazardous chemicals. Additionally, chemical methods, such as advanced oxidation processes, redox reactions, and adsorption, are scrutinized for their efficiency in chemical degradation and transformation. The comparative analysis considers factors like effectiveness, cost, environmental impact, and applicability to different chemical classes. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these detoxification approaches is essential for informed decision-making in environmental remediation and industrial processes. This review offers valuable insights into the selection of appropriate detoxification methods, based on the nature of the hazardous chemicals and the desired environmental and economic outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
协调有害化学品解毒的生物和化学战略:综合评述
危险化学品的管理和缓解对环境和人类健康构成了重大挑战。本综述严格审查了生物和化学方法对危险化学品解毒的功效。从有机污染物到重金属,危险化学品经常污染土壤、水和空气,对生态和健康造成不利影响。传统的化学方法有其局限性,例如会产生二次污染物和运营成本高昂。相比之下,生物方法利用微生物、植物和酶的新陈代谢活动来转化或降解有害化合物。本综述评估了生物系统(包括生物修复、植物修复和基于酶的方法)在各类危险化学品解毒方面的性能。此外,还对高级氧化过程、氧化还原反应和吸附等化学方法在化学降解和转化方面的效率进行了仔细研究。比较分析考虑了有效性、成本、环境影响以及对不同类别化学品的适用性等因素。了解这些解毒方法的优缺点对于在环境修复和工业流程中做出明智决策至关重要。本综述根据危险化学品的性质以及所期望的环境和经济结果,为选择适当的解毒方法提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigating the Inhibition of Mild Steel Corrosion by Tectona grandis Dye Extract in Acidic Environment: Thermodynamics and Adsorption Properties Preparation and Characterization of Phthaloyl Chitosan as a Novel Purifying Agent for Deltamethrin Chemical Modification and Denaturation Effects on the Hemagglutinating Activity of Two Pterocarpus Species Seeds Lectins Investigating Global Reactivity Profiles and Key Reactive Sites of Eight Tetracyanoquinodimethane Derivatives: A Computational Study Using B3LYP/6-311G(d,p) theory level Mechanism and Kinetic Studies of the Adsorption of Congo Red on Three Adsorbent Materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1