National legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms

1 Pub Date : 2023-11-15 DOI:10.26565/1684-8489-2023-1-01
Ihor Dunayev, Oleksandr Orlov
{"title":"National legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms","authors":"Ihor Dunayev, Oleksandr Orlov","doi":"10.26565/1684-8489-2023-1-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article serves as a logical continuation of the authors’ series of publications on the public regulation of information platforms and platform economies. The objective of this article is to provide a concise summary of the rich international experience in national legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms while identifying pertinent models of such regulation. It further contributes to the ongoing extensive expert and policy debate regarding what, how, and whom to regulate in the new platform environment, in which nearly everyone participates or will soon be involved. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of legislation in foreign jurisdictions, the article highlights and elucidates three main models of legal regulation for the digital economy, using examples: the model of legislative regulation of the digital economy, the national strategic model, and the regional strategic model. The conclusion is drawn that Ukraine exhibits significant features that largely correspond to the first model. Such a model may involve the creation of specific legislation aimed at digital sector development, stimulating innovation and supporting startups. Nevertheless, Ukraine has already begun to encounter limitations associated with this model, as the digital economy evolves more rapidly than the government and legislators can adapt the legal framework to the latest changes, resulting in regulatory gaps.","PeriodicalId":6298,"journal":{"name":"1","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2023-1-01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article serves as a logical continuation of the authors’ series of publications on the public regulation of information platforms and platform economies. The objective of this article is to provide a concise summary of the rich international experience in national legal regulation of the digital economy and information platforms while identifying pertinent models of such regulation. It further contributes to the ongoing extensive expert and policy debate regarding what, how, and whom to regulate in the new platform environment, in which nearly everyone participates or will soon be involved. Drawing on a comprehensive analysis of legislation in foreign jurisdictions, the article highlights and elucidates three main models of legal regulation for the digital economy, using examples: the model of legislative regulation of the digital economy, the national strategic model, and the regional strategic model. The conclusion is drawn that Ukraine exhibits significant features that largely correspond to the first model. Such a model may involve the creation of specific legislation aimed at digital sector development, stimulating innovation and supporting startups. Nevertheless, Ukraine has already begun to encounter limitations associated with this model, as the digital economy evolves more rapidly than the government and legislators can adapt the legal framework to the latest changes, resulting in regulatory gaps.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国家对数字经济和信息平台的法律监管
本文是作者关于信息平台和平台经济公共监管系列出版物的逻辑延续。本文旨在简明扼要地总结各国在数字经济和信息平台法律监管方面的丰富国际经验,同时确定此类监管的相关模式。本文还有助于专家和政策制定者就新平台环境下的监管内容、监管方式和监管对象展开广泛讨论,几乎每个人都参与其中或即将参与其中。文章通过对外国司法管辖区立法的全面分析,举例强调并阐明了数字经济法律监管的三种主要模式:数字经济立法监管模式、国家战略模式和地区战略模式。文章的结论是,乌克兰在很大程度上符合第一种模式。这种模式可能涉及制定旨在促进数字行业发展、激励创新和支持初创企业的具体立法。然而,乌克兰已经开始遇到与这种模式相关的限制,因为数字经济的发展速度比政府和立法者调整法律框架以适应最新变化的速度更快,从而导致监管空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
1
1
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Business Efficiency: The Role of Digital Transfor-mation in Modern Enterprises Evaluating the Websites of Academic Departments Using the GRA Method Alice Walker's Portrayal of inequality and unfair treatment towards Women in the Novel "The Color Purple" Investigation of Machining Parameters for Turning Process Smart Movable Road Divider and Clearance Ambulance Path Management Through IOT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1