Vanuatu Leads Drive to Secure an Opinion from the International Court of Justice on State Responsibilities to Turn Words into Action on Climate Change

Sue Farran
{"title":"Vanuatu Leads Drive to Secure an Opinion from the International Court of Justice on State Responsibilities to Turn Words into Action on Climate Change","authors":"Sue Farran","doi":"10.38127/uqlj.v42i3.8641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2022, the Pacific-island State of Vanuatu declared a climate emergency. Though it is not the first nation to do so, the difference is that Vanuatu has been instrumental in getting the United Nations General Assembly ('UNGA’) to refer the issue of climate change to the International Court of Justice (‘ICJ’) for an Opinion. The intention to do this was first mooted by a civil organisation of young people: ‘The Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change’. The proposal gathered momentum with an alliance of civil society actors and subsequently other states supporting and co-sponsoring the resolution passed by UNGA. The Paris Agreement and Paris Rulebook are steps forward but need implementation. A legal framing of international obligations could advance this. While an ICJ opinion would have no legally binding effect, it could nevertheless be of some practical benefit in a context where there is increasing recognition of the link between existing human rights and the environment and growing demand — particularly by those most adversely affected — for translating promises into action. This article considers the imperatives behind this call to the ICJ, the potential challenges that may be raised before the Court, and the possible outcomes for this initiative.","PeriodicalId":83293,"journal":{"name":"The University of Queensland law journal","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The University of Queensland law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38127/uqlj.v42i3.8641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2022, the Pacific-island State of Vanuatu declared a climate emergency. Though it is not the first nation to do so, the difference is that Vanuatu has been instrumental in getting the United Nations General Assembly ('UNGA’) to refer the issue of climate change to the International Court of Justice (‘ICJ’) for an Opinion. The intention to do this was first mooted by a civil organisation of young people: ‘The Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change’. The proposal gathered momentum with an alliance of civil society actors and subsequently other states supporting and co-sponsoring the resolution passed by UNGA. The Paris Agreement and Paris Rulebook are steps forward but need implementation. A legal framing of international obligations could advance this. While an ICJ opinion would have no legally binding effect, it could nevertheless be of some practical benefit in a context where there is increasing recognition of the link between existing human rights and the environment and growing demand — particularly by those most adversely affected — for translating promises into action. This article considers the imperatives behind this call to the ICJ, the potential challenges that may be raised before the Court, and the possible outcomes for this initiative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瓦努阿图带头争取国际法院就国家责任发表意见,将气候变化问题化言为行
2022 年,太平洋岛国瓦努阿图宣布进入气候紧急状态。虽然瓦努阿图不是第一个这样做的国家,但不同的是,瓦努阿图在促使联合国大会('UNGA')将气候变化问题提交国际法院('ICJ')征求意见方面发挥了重要作用。这一意图最初是由一个青年民间组织 "太平洋岛屿学生抗击气候变化 "提出的。这一提议得到了民间社会行动者联盟的支持,随后其他国家也支持并共同提出了联合国大会通过的决议。巴黎协定》和《巴黎规则手册》是向前迈出的一步,但需要落实。国际义务的法律框架可以推动这一进程。虽然国际法院的意见不具有法律约束力,但在人们日益认识到现有人权与环境之间的联系,以及人们--尤其是那些受到最不利影响的人们--日益要求将承诺转化为行动的背景下,该意见可能会带来一些实际益处。本文探讨了向国际法院发出这一呼吁背后的必要性、可能向法院提出的潜在挑战以及这一倡议的可能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Robodebt and Novel Data Technologies in the Public Sector The Territorial Scope of Australia’s Unfair Contract Terms Provisions Regulating Decisions that Lead to Loss of Life in Workplaces Lending on the Edge Substantive Equality and the Possibilities of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1