Early Impacts of Invasive Shrub Removal on Riparian Arthropod Communities

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2023-11-09 DOI:10.3368/er.41.4.189
Natalie M. West, David H. Branson, J. M. Muscha, Joshua W. Campbell
{"title":"Early Impacts of Invasive Shrub Removal on Riparian Arthropod Communities","authors":"Natalie M. West, David H. Branson, J. M. Muscha, Joshua W. Campbell","doi":"10.3368/er.41.4.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Plant invasions can change native communities in complex ways. Restoring invasion-altered habitats starts with invader removal, and imposes significant physical and compositional changes. Restoration facilitates desirable plant community development, but arthropod community responses to removal and the timelines required for native vegetation establishment are difficult to predict. We examined initial effects of Elaeagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) removal on arthropod communities during a long-term experiment evaluating the combined consequences of invasive shrub removal and plant community restoration. We sampled E. angustifolia-invaded areas pre-removal (2010) and post-removal (2013) using sweep netting, and identified arthropods to family level. We found greater variation in the arthropod community composition within removal blocks than within invaded blocks after two years. These shifts resulted from changes in the relative abundance of community members (e.g., Dictynidae (Araneae), Culicidae (Diptera), and Cicadellidae (Hemiptera)), rather than overall richness or diversity. This response is likely due to increased plant diversity in E. angustifolia removal sites but also structural differences in vegetation cover after removal. Removing a dominant structural element like E. angustifolia instantly changes the successional stage of the ecosystem. Thus, restoration managers should consider methods that maintain structural continuity during restoration implementation. Arthropods provide important ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and pollination and serve as a prey base for higher trophic levels. Thus, understanding how arthropod communities change after plant restoration events is vital to assessing future management decisions to limit ecosystem impacts of invasive plants and their management.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3368/er.41.4.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Plant invasions can change native communities in complex ways. Restoring invasion-altered habitats starts with invader removal, and imposes significant physical and compositional changes. Restoration facilitates desirable plant community development, but arthropod community responses to removal and the timelines required for native vegetation establishment are difficult to predict. We examined initial effects of Elaeagnus angustifolia (Russian olive) removal on arthropod communities during a long-term experiment evaluating the combined consequences of invasive shrub removal and plant community restoration. We sampled E. angustifolia-invaded areas pre-removal (2010) and post-removal (2013) using sweep netting, and identified arthropods to family level. We found greater variation in the arthropod community composition within removal blocks than within invaded blocks after two years. These shifts resulted from changes in the relative abundance of community members (e.g., Dictynidae (Araneae), Culicidae (Diptera), and Cicadellidae (Hemiptera)), rather than overall richness or diversity. This response is likely due to increased plant diversity in E. angustifolia removal sites but also structural differences in vegetation cover after removal. Removing a dominant structural element like E. angustifolia instantly changes the successional stage of the ecosystem. Thus, restoration managers should consider methods that maintain structural continuity during restoration implementation. Arthropods provide important ecosystem services such as nutrient cycling and pollination and serve as a prey base for higher trophic levels. Thus, understanding how arthropod communities change after plant restoration events is vital to assessing future management decisions to limit ecosystem impacts of invasive plants and their management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移除入侵灌木对河岸节肢动物群落的早期影响
摘要 植物入侵会以复杂的方式改变本地群落。恢复被入侵改变的栖息地首先要清除入侵者,这将带来巨大的物理和成分变化。恢复有利于理想植物群落的发展,但节肢动物群落对移除的反应以及原生植被建立所需的时间很难预测。我们在一项长期实验中考察了移除俄罗斯橄榄(Elaeagnus angustifolia)对节肢动物群落的初步影响,该实验评估了移除入侵灌木和植物群落恢复的综合后果。我们在移除前(2010 年)和移除后(2013 年)对俄罗斯榄属植物入侵区域进行了取样,并对节肢动物进行了科级鉴定。我们发现,两年后,移除区块内节肢动物群落组成的变化大于入侵区块内的变化。这些变化源于群落成员(如鹤形目(Dictynidae)、双翅目(Culicidae)和半翅目(Cicadellidae))相对丰度的变化,而非总体丰富度或多样性的变化。这种反应可能是由于移除 E. angustifolia 的地点植物多样性增加,但也可能是由于移除后植被覆盖的结构差异。移除像 E. angustifolia 这样的主要结构元素会立即改变生态系统的演替阶段。因此,恢复管理者应考虑在实施恢复过程中保持结构连续性的方法。节肢动物提供重要的生态系统服务,如养分循环和授粉,并为更高营养级提供猎物。因此,了解节肢动物群落在植物恢复活动后如何变化,对于评估未来的管理决策以限制入侵植物及其管理对生态系统的影响至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1