Purification procedures used for the detection of gender DIF: Item bias in a foreign language test

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.21449/ijate.1250358
Serap Büyükkidik
{"title":"Purification procedures used for the detection of gender DIF: Item bias in a foreign language test","authors":"Serap Büyükkidik","doi":"10.21449/ijate.1250358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential item functioning (DIF) detection was handled based on “Mantel-Haenszel (MH)”, “Simultaneous item bias test (SIBTEST)”, “Lord's chi-square”, “Raju's area” methods when item purification was performed or item purification was not performed using real data in current study. After detecting gender-related DIF, expert opinions were taken for bias study. It is important to conduct the gender bias research in the English test when purification is performed and when purification is not performed, as there were DIF studies, but there were not completely similar bias studies in the literature. The sample of the research consists of 7389 students who took the “Transition from Primary to Secondary Education Exam (TPSEE, referred to as “TEOG” in Turkey)” administered in April 2017. When gender-related DIF analysis was performed with the four methods, the results were found to differ partially. DIF analysis results differed in the different conditions item purification was performed or not. Detection of DIF was indicative of possible bias. In the second stage of the study, the opinions of seven experts were taken for item 11, for which DIF was detected at least at B level based on MH, SIBTEST. As a result of expert opinion, it was found that there was no item bias according to gender in any item in the English test. It is recommended that similar bias studies can be conducted for test developers to be aware of the features that may lead to item bias and to construct unbiased items.","PeriodicalId":42417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1250358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) detection was handled based on “Mantel-Haenszel (MH)”, “Simultaneous item bias test (SIBTEST)”, “Lord's chi-square”, “Raju's area” methods when item purification was performed or item purification was not performed using real data in current study. After detecting gender-related DIF, expert opinions were taken for bias study. It is important to conduct the gender bias research in the English test when purification is performed and when purification is not performed, as there were DIF studies, but there were not completely similar bias studies in the literature. The sample of the research consists of 7389 students who took the “Transition from Primary to Secondary Education Exam (TPSEE, referred to as “TEOG” in Turkey)” administered in April 2017. When gender-related DIF analysis was performed with the four methods, the results were found to differ partially. DIF analysis results differed in the different conditions item purification was performed or not. Detection of DIF was indicative of possible bias. In the second stage of the study, the opinions of seven experts were taken for item 11, for which DIF was detected at least at B level based on MH, SIBTEST. As a result of expert opinion, it was found that there was no item bias according to gender in any item in the English test. It is recommended that similar bias studies can be conducted for test developers to be aware of the features that may lead to item bias and to construct unbiased items.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检测性别 DIF 的净化程序:外语测试中的项目偏差
在本研究中,如果使用真实数据进行了项目净化或未进行项目净化,则根据 "Mantel-Haenszel(MH)"、"同时项目偏差检验(SIBTEST)"、"Lord's chi-square"、"Raju's area "等方法进行差异项目功能(DIF)检测。在检测出与性别相关的 DIF 后,专家意见被用于偏差研究。在英语测试中进行净化和不进行净化时的性别偏差研究非常重要,因为虽然有 DIF 研究,但文献中并没有完全类似的偏差研究。研究样本包括参加2017年4月举行的 "小学升中学教育过渡考试(TPSEE,土耳其简称 "TEOG")"的7389名学生。当使用四种方法进行与性别相关的 DIF 分析时,发现结果存在部分差异。在是否进行项目纯化的不同条件下,DIF 分析结果有所不同。DIF 的检测表明可能存在偏差。在研究的第二阶段,针对根据 MH、SIBTEST 检测出 DIF 至少为 B 级的项目 11,采纳了七位专家的意见。根据专家的意见,我们发现英语测试中的任何项目都不存在性别偏差。建议进行类似的偏差研究,以便测试开发人员了解可能导致项目偏差的特征,并构建无偏见的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education
International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The difference between estimated and perceived item difficulty: An empirical study Current Effect of Mother-Child Memory Talk on Emotion Regulation, Self-Esteem, and Memory Anxiety scale for parents of gifted children (ASPGC): Validity and reliability study Examining the validity and reliability of the academic entitlement scale in Turkish culture The examination of mediating role of distributed leadership in the relationship between school structure and accountability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1