Interacting with best practice advisory (BPA) notifications in the electronic medical record significantly improves screening rates for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Kaylah Pinkney BS , Amin Mohamed Ahmed MD , Saideep Bose MD , Matthew Breeden MD , Matthew R. Smeds MD
{"title":"Interacting with best practice advisory (BPA) notifications in the electronic medical record significantly improves screening rates for abdominal aortic aneurysms","authors":"Kaylah Pinkney BS ,&nbsp;Amin Mohamed Ahmed MD ,&nbsp;Saideep Bose MD ,&nbsp;Matthew Breeden MD ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Smeds MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvsvi.2023.100037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Best practice advisory notifications (BPAs) have become an integral part of many electronic medical record (EMR) systems. These communications alert providers to recommended therapy or screenings for patients depending on factors found within the EMR. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of BPAs on the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in patients who met guidelines for screening in a single-center EMR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We reviewed all patients who triggered a BPA alert for AAA screening from December 2018 to December 2021 in a single tertiary academic setting. The BPA alerts the provider when closing the chart when a patient meets the criteria for AAA screening based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations of screening male patients aged 65 to 75 years with a smoking history. Provider responses to these triggers were analyzed, and the predictors of response to the advisory and its impact on AAA screening for individual patients within 6 months of the alert was evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over this period, 1292 patients triggered the BPA for AAA screening. After excluding deceased patients, 1205 patients were included in the final analysis. Providers interacted with rather than dismissed the BPA in 20.4% of patients. The overall screening rate in this patient cohort was 28.28%. Interacting with the BPA significantly increased the odds of being appropriately screened for a AAA (odds ratio, 2.48). A higher number of visits and BPA triggers correlated with increased odds of undergoing screening for AAA (odds ratios, 1.08 and 1.02, respectively). Additionally, patients who underwent screening were younger in age and more often African American as compared with other races. The presence and number of comorbid conditions were not associated with screening rates, although hyperlipidemia was associated with positive response to BPA.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The overall rate of appropriate AAA screening is low, despite the presence of BPAs. Positively interacting with rather than dismissing the BPA is correlated with an increased rate of appropriate AAA screening. Providers were more likely to screen patients if the patient was younger, had more health care system visits, or if the trigger was delivered more often to members of the health care team. Further study is needed to evaluate provider factors that will result in an increased adherence to recommended screening guidelines.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74034,"journal":{"name":"JVS-vascular insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300034X/pdfft?md5=5e925ee9e1c2aafa5ed61ad164ceae8c&pid=1-s2.0-S294991272300034X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JVS-vascular insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294991272300034X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Best practice advisory notifications (BPAs) have become an integral part of many electronic medical record (EMR) systems. These communications alert providers to recommended therapy or screenings for patients depending on factors found within the EMR. Our goal was to evaluate the impact of BPAs on the rate of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening in patients who met guidelines for screening in a single-center EMR.

Methods

We reviewed all patients who triggered a BPA alert for AAA screening from December 2018 to December 2021 in a single tertiary academic setting. The BPA alerts the provider when closing the chart when a patient meets the criteria for AAA screening based on the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations of screening male patients aged 65 to 75 years with a smoking history. Provider responses to these triggers were analyzed, and the predictors of response to the advisory and its impact on AAA screening for individual patients within 6 months of the alert was evaluated.

Results

Over this period, 1292 patients triggered the BPA for AAA screening. After excluding deceased patients, 1205 patients were included in the final analysis. Providers interacted with rather than dismissed the BPA in 20.4% of patients. The overall screening rate in this patient cohort was 28.28%. Interacting with the BPA significantly increased the odds of being appropriately screened for a AAA (odds ratio, 2.48). A higher number of visits and BPA triggers correlated with increased odds of undergoing screening for AAA (odds ratios, 1.08 and 1.02, respectively). Additionally, patients who underwent screening were younger in age and more often African American as compared with other races. The presence and number of comorbid conditions were not associated with screening rates, although hyperlipidemia was associated with positive response to BPA.

Conclusions

The overall rate of appropriate AAA screening is low, despite the presence of BPAs. Positively interacting with rather than dismissing the BPA is correlated with an increased rate of appropriate AAA screening. Providers were more likely to screen patients if the patient was younger, had more health care system visits, or if the trigger was delivered more often to members of the health care team. Further study is needed to evaluate provider factors that will result in an increased adherence to recommended screening guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与电子病历中的最佳实践建议 (BPA) 通知互动可显著提高腹主动脉瘤的筛查率
目标最佳实践建议通知(BPA)已成为许多电子病历(EMR)系统不可或缺的一部分。这些通信提醒医疗服务提供者根据 EMR 中发现的因素为患者推荐治疗或筛查。我们的目标是评估 BPA 对单个中心 EMR 中符合筛查指南的患者进行腹主动脉瘤(AAA)筛查率的影响。方法我们回顾了 2018 年 12 月至 2021 年 12 月在单个三级学术机构中触发 BPA 警报进行 AAA 筛查的所有患者。根据美国预防服务工作组关于对 65 至 75 岁有吸烟史的男性患者进行筛查的建议,当患者符合 AAA 筛查标准时,BPA 会在关闭病历时提醒医疗服务提供者。我们分析了医疗服务提供者对这些触发器的反应,并评估了在警报发出后 6 个月内对咨询反应的预测因素及其对单个患者 AAA 筛查的影响。结果在此期间,有 1292 名患者触发了 BPA 进行 AAA 筛查。在排除已故患者后,最终分析包括了 1205 名患者。在 20.4% 的患者中,医护人员与 BPA 进行了互动,而不是拒绝接受 BPA。该患者群的总体筛查率为 28.28%。与 BPA 互动可显著提高 AAA 适当筛查的几率(几率比为 2.48)。就诊次数和 BPA 触发次数越多,接受 AAA 筛查的几率越大(几率比分别为 1.08 和 1.02)。此外,与其他种族相比,接受筛查的患者年龄更小,更多是非裔美国人。合并症的存在和数量与筛查率无关,但高脂血症与对 BPA 的阳性反应有关。与 BPA 积极互动而不是拒绝接受 BPA 与 AAA 适当筛查率的提高有关。如果患者较年轻,在医疗保健系统就诊次数较多,或向医疗保健团队成员提供触发器的次数较多,则医疗服务提供者更有可能对患者进行筛查。还需要进一步研究,以评估医疗服务提供者的因素,从而提高对推荐筛查指南的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regarding “Intravascular Ultrasound Use in Peripheral Arterial and Deep Venous Interventions: Multidisciplinary Expert Opinion from SCAI/AVF/AVLS/SIR/SVM/SVS” An Assessment of Racial Diversity in Vascular Surgery Educational Resources The use of artificial intelligence in three-dimensional imaging modalities and diabetic foot disease – a systematic review Room for improvement in patient compliance during peripheral vascular interventions Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1